IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/esj/esridp/014.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Micro Data Studies on Japanese Tax Policy and Consumption in the 1990s

Author

Listed:
  • HORI Masahiro
  • SHIMIZUTANI Satoshi

Abstract

Part I : Consumer Response to the 1998 Tax Cut: Which of Tax Cut or Coupon Program is More Effective? The Japanese Government implemented two tax cut packages in 1998. A unique feature of the 1998 tax cuts is that the tax cut amount for each household is based on the number of family members regardless of income level. A wage-earner's household receives the tax cut benefit as a decrease in withheld taxes. Wage earners are entitled to receive a national income tax cut of up to 18,000 yen plus 9,000 yen for each dependant (effective from February) as well as a local inhabitant's tax cut of up to 17,000 yen plus 8,500 yen for each dependant (effective from June). Using monthly data on worker's households from the Family Income and Expenditure Survey (FIES), in this study we explore the variation in the impact of the tax cut episode across families with different numbers of family members to identify its impact on consumption. The estimates using monthly change in consumption indicate that consumers responded to the 1998 tax cut with the implied MPC of 0.6 on impact with stimulating services consumption but the MPC declined in subsequent months. A comparison of the impact on consumption with the shopping coupons program administered in the spring of 1999 based on the same specification demonstrates that the 1998 tax cut and the coupon program affected consumption of different types of goods and that the estimated MPC was roughly comparable and followed the similar pattern. Part II : Consumer Response to the 1994 Tax Cut: Evaluating the First Tax Cut in the 1990s. This paper explores the reaction of Japanese consumers to the 1994 tax cut, which was the first tax cut administered by the Japanese government in the 1990s. Micro-level data from the Family Income and Expenditure Survey (FIES) is used to evaluate the effect of the 1994 tax cut on consumption. The estimates weakly suggest that tax cuts undertaken to stimulate the weak economy in 1994 had some effect on consumption of non-durables or semi-durables. An MPC of 0.1 - 0.2 is estimated right after implementation, but the positive effect was substituted immediately in subsequent months. In other words, consumers reacted to the temporary tax cut but the effect was small and transitory. Part III : Consumer Response to the 1995/1996 Tax Cut: Are Temporary Tax Cuts Effective in Anticipation of Tax Increase? This paper tries to evaluate the effects of the 1995/1996 tax cuts administered by the Japanese government. These tax cuts were implemented exactly in the same manner at different timing. Especially, the 1996 tax cut is unique in the timing, i.e. it was implemented only three months before the consumption tax rate increase from 3% to 5%. We use micro-level data of the Family Income and Expenditure Survey (FIES) to evaluate the effect of the 1995 and 1996 tax cuts implemented in December in these two years on individual household's consumption, focusing on the difference between the two episodes. The estimates indicate that these tax cuts actually stimulated consumption on impact, though the effect decreased in following months, and also suggest that the effect was smaller for the 1996 tax cut than the 1995 tax cut. This finding probably suggests that the Ricardian equivalence story might hold and individual households do not respond to a tax cut in anticipation of coming tax increase, when the timing of tax reduction and tax increase is very close.

Suggested Citation

  • HORI Masahiro & SHIMIZUTANI Satoshi, 2002. "Micro Data Studies on Japanese Tax Policy and Consumption in the 1990s," ESRI Discussion paper series 014, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:esj:esridp:014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.esri.go.jp/jp/archive/e_dis/e_dis014/e_dis014.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zeldes, Stephen P, 1989. "Consumption and Liquidity Constraints: An Empirical Investigation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 97(2), pages 305-346, April.
    2. Martin Browning & M. Dolores Collado, 2001. "The Response of Expenditures to Anticipated Income Changes: Panel Data Estimates," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(3), pages 681-692, June.
    3. Jonathan A. Parker, 1999. "The Reaction of Household Consumption to Predictable Changes in Social Security Taxes," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 89(4), pages 959-973, September.
    4. Shapiro, Matthew D & Slemrod, Joel, 1995. "Consumer Response to the Timing of Income: Evidence from a Change in Tax Withholding," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(1), pages 274-283, March.
    5. Blinder, Alan S, 1981. "Temporary Income Taxes and Consumer Spending," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 89(1), pages 26-53, February.
    6. Poterba, James M, 1988. "Are Consumers Forward Looking? Evidence from Fiscal Experiments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 78(2), pages 413-418, May.
    7. D. Carroll Christopher, 2000. "Risky Habits and the Marginal Propensity to Consume Output of Permanent Income, or, How Much Would a Permanent Tax Cut Boost Japanese Consumption?," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 1-40.
    8. Ishi, Hiromitsu, 2001. "The Japanese Tax System," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 3, number 9780199242566.
    9. Christopher D Carroll, 2000. "'Risky Habits' and the Marginal Propensity to Consume Out of Permanent Income or How Much Would a Permanent Tax Cut Boost Japanese Consumption?," Economics Working Paper Archive 429, The Johns Hopkins University,Department of Economics.
    10. HORI Masahiro & HSIEH Chang-Tai & MURATA Keiko & SHIMIZUTANI Satoshi, 2002. "Did the Shopping Coupon Program Stimulate Consumption? Evidence from Japanese Micro Data," ESRI Discussion paper series 012, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    11. Nicholas S. Souleles, 1999. "The Response of Household Consumption to Income Tax Refunds," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 89(4), pages 947-958, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Masahiro Hori & Satoshi Shimizutani, 2007. "Are Tax Cuts Effective Even In Anticipation Of A Future Tax Increase? Evidence From Japan'S Unique Episodes In The 1990s," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 52(02), pages 167-177.
    2. HORI Masahiro & SHIMIZUTANI Satoshi, 2002. "Micro Data Studies on Japanese Household Consumption," ESRI Discussion paper series 015, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    3. Toshiyuki Uemura & Yoshimi Adachi & Tomoki Kitamura, 2017. "Effects of Individual Resident Tax on the Consumption of Near-Retired Households in Japan," Discussion Paper Series 161, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University, revised May 2017.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shimizutani, Satoshi, 2006. "Consumer response to the 1998 tax cut: Is a temporary tax cut effective?," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 269-287, June.
    2. repec:pri:wwseco:dp231 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Nicholas S. Souleles & Jonathan A. Parker & David S. Johnson, 2006. "Household Expenditure and the Income Tax Rebates of 2001," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(5), pages 1589-1610, December.
    4. Sumit Agarwal & Chunlin Liu & Nicholas S. Souleles, 2007. "The Reaction of Consumer Spending and Debt to Tax Rebates-Evidence from Consumer Credit Data," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 115(6), pages 986-1019, December.
    5. Jonathan Heathcote, 2005. "Fiscal Policy with Heterogeneous Agents and Incomplete Markets," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 72(1), pages 161-188.
    6. David Card & Raj Chetty & Andrea Weber, 2007. "Cash-on-Hand and Competing Models of Intertemporal Behavior: New Evidence from the Labor Market," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 122(4), pages 1511-1560.
    7. Broda, Christian & Parker, Jonathan A., 2014. "The Economic Stimulus Payments of 2008 and the aggregate demand for consumption," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(S), pages 20-36.
    8. Matthew D. Shapiro & Joel Slemrod, 2003. "Consumer Response to Tax Rebates," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(1), pages 381-396, March.
    9. Lusardi, Annamaria & Mitchell, Olivia S., 2007. "The reaction of consumer spending and debt to tax rebates: Evidence from consumer credit data," CFS Working Paper Series 2008/01, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    10. Sumit Agarwal & Leslie McGranahan, 2012. "Spending responses to state sales tax holidays," Working Paper Series WP-2012-10, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    11. Ni, Shawn & Seol, Youn, 2014. "New evidence on excess sensitivity of household consumption," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 80-94.
    12. Hori Masahiro & Shimizutani Satoshi, 2009. "The Response of Household Expenditure to Anticipated Income Changes: Bonus Payments and the Seasonality of Consumption in Japan," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, August.
    13. HORI Masahiro & SHIMIZUTANI Satoshi, 2002. "Micro Data Studies on Japanese Household Consumption," ESRI Discussion paper series 015, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    14. Alan S. Blinder, 2004. "The Case Against the Case Against Discretionary Fiscal Policy," Working Papers 102, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies..
    15. Daniel Aaronson & Sumit Agarwal & Eric French, 2008. "The consumption response to minimum wage increases," Working Paper Series WP-07-23, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    16. Effrosyni Adamopoulou & Roberta Zizza, 2015. "Accessorizing. The effect of union contract renewals on consumption," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1024, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    17. Melvin Stephens & Takashi Unayama, 2011. "The Consumption Response to Seasonal Income: Evidence from Japanese Public Pension Benefits," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 3(4), pages 86-118, October.
    18. Yasue Hakata, 2022. "Do People Smooth their After-Tax Income? Evidence from Japanese Local Tax," Bulletin of Applied Economics, Risk Market Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 147-158.
    19. Zizza, Roberta & Adamopoulou, Effrosyni, 2017. "Regular versus lump-sum payments in union contracts and household consumption," Working Paper Series 2013, European Central Bank.
    20. Alan J. Auerbach & William G. Gale, 2009. "Activist fiscal policy to stabilize economic activity," Proceedings - Economic Policy Symposium - Jackson Hole, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pages 327-374.
    21. Alan S. Blinder, 2004. "The Case Against the Case Against Discretionary Fiscal Policy," Working Papers 102, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies..

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:esj:esridp:014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: HORI nobuko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esrgvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.