Does The Specification of A New Class of Poverty Measures Matter? Evidence from Tunisia
The evaluation of the horizontal inefficiency of an anti-poverty design is often reduced to the determination of the type I errors, which occur where eligible individuals are not awarded benefits. Because under-coverage ratio does not consider the social cost resulting from unequal treatment of like individuals, it is irrelevant in assessing the severity and the depth of horizontal inefficiency. Also, when the cost of inequality approach is adopted to derive from a poverty measure, respecting the transfer axiom, a cost of inequality that is decomposable into two components, corresponding to vertical and horizontal inequality respectively, it is no longer possible to have different aversions toward these two forms of inequality. We follow then the cost of inequality approach after specifying a new class of poverty measures, which are parameterized by two coefficients allowing so different preferences toward these two equality principles. When these two coefficients are identical, the new poverty measures class reduces to the Foster, Greer and Thorbecke?s (1984) class, whose poverty measures imply the same aversion to vertical inequality and horizontal inequity. Further, for a given poverty line, the new class enables to characterize the set of poverty measures in which policymakers are indifferent between the post-reform poverty alleviation program and the status quo.
|Date of creation:||Sep 2003|
|Date of revision:||Sep 2003|
|Publication status:||Published by The Economic Research Forum (ERF)|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.erf.org.eg
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:0327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Namees Nabeel)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.