IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/eureir/18640.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Continuous Review Inventory Model with Advance Policy Change and Obsolescence

Author

Listed:
  • Pinçe, C.
  • Dekker, R.

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a continuous review inventory system of a slow moving item for which the demand rate drops to a lower level at a pre-determined time. Inventory system is controlled according to one-for-one replenishment policy with fixed lead time. Adaptation to the lower demand rate is achieved by changing the control policy in advance and letting the demand take away the excess stocks. We showed that the timing of the control policy change primarily determines the tradeoff between backordering penalties and obsolescence costs. We propose an approximate solution for the optimal time to shift to the new control policy minimizing the expected total cost during the transient period. We found that the advance policy change results in significant cost savings and our model yields near optimal expected total costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Pinçe, C. & Dekker, R., 2010. "A Continuous Review Inventory Model with Advance Policy Change and Obsolescence," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2009-45, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:18640
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/18640/EI2009-45.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jalil, M.N. & Zuidwijk, R.A. & Fleischmann, M. & van Nunen, J.A.E.E., 2009. "Spare Parts Logistics and Installed Base Information," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-002-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    2. Jing-Sheng Song & Paul H. Zipkin, 1996. "Managing Inventory with the Prospect of Obsolescence," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 215-222, February.
    3. George W. Brown & John Y. Lu & Robert J. Wolfson, 1964. "Dynamic Modeling of Inventories Subject to Obsolescence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 51-63, September.
    4. Israel David & Avraham Mehrez, 1995. "An Inventory Model with Exogenous Failures," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(5), pages 902-903, October.
    5. G. Hadley & T. M. Whitin, 1962. "A Family of Dynamic Inventory Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(4), pages 458-469, July.
    6. Anthony Hart, 1973. "Determination of Excess Stock Quantities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(12), pages 1444-1451, August.
    7. C. Mohan & R. C. Garg, 1961. "Decision on Retention of Excess Stock," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 496-499, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. van Jaarsveld, Willem & Dekker, Rommert, 2011. "Estimating obsolescence risk from demand data to enhance inventory control--A case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 423-431, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pinçe, Çerag & Dekker, Rommert, 2011. "An inventory model for slow moving items subject to obsolescence," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 83-95, August.
    2. Song, Yuyue & Lau, Hoong Chuin, 2004. "A periodic-review inventory model with application to the continuous-review obsolescence problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(1), pages 110-120, November.
    3. Cattani, Kyle D. & Souza, Gilvan C., 2003. "Good buy? Delaying end-of-life purchases," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 216-228, April.
    4. Markus Emsermann & Burton Simon, 2007. "Optimal Control of an Inventory with Simultaneous Obsolescence," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 37(5), pages 445-454, October.
    5. van Jaarsveld, Willem & Dekker, Rommert, 2011. "Estimating obsolescence risk from demand data to enhance inventory control--A case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 423-431, September.
    6. Opher Baron & Oded Berman & David Perry, 2010. "Continuous review inventory models for perishable items ordered in batches," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 72(2), pages 217-247, October.
    7. Israel David & Eitan Greenshtein & Avraham Mehrez, 1997. "A dynamic‐programming approach to continuous‐review obsolescent inventory problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(8), pages 757-774, December.
    8. Silver, Edward A. & A. Willoughby, Keith, 1999. "Disposal of excess stock at the end of a project when facing on-going operational usage," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 189-194, March.
    9. Jochen Schlapp & Moritz Fleischmann & Danja Sonntag, 2022. "Inventory timing: How to serve a stochastic season," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(7), pages 2891-2906, July.
    10. Fleischhacker, Adam J. & Zhao, Yao, 2011. "Planning for demand failure: A dynamic lot size model for clinical trial supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 496-506, June.
    11. Alamri, Adel A. & Syntetos, Aris A., 2018. "Beyond LIFO and FIFO: Exploring an Allocation-In-Fraction-Out (AIFO) policy in a two-warehouse inventory model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 33-45.
    12. Yossi Aviv, 2003. "A Time-Series Framework for Supply-Chain Inventory Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 210-227, April.
    13. Li Chen & Jing-Sheng Song & Yue Zhang, 2017. "Serial Inventory Systems with Markov-Modulated Demand: Derivative Bounds, Asymptotic Analysis, and Insights," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1231-1249, October.
    14. Bradley R. Staats & Diwas S. KC & Francesca Gino, 2018. "Maintaining Beliefs in the Face of Negative News: The Moderating Role of Experience," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 804-824, February.
    15. Xiangwen Lu & Jing-Sheng Song & Amelia Regan, 2006. "Inventory Planning with Forecast Updates: Approximate Solutions and Cost Error Bounds," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(6), pages 1079-1097, December.
    16. Yonit Barron & Opher Baron, 2020. "The residual time approach for (Q, r) model under perishability, general lead times, and lost sales," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 92(3), pages 601-648, December.
    17. Awi Federgruen & Min Wang, 2013. "Monotonicity properties of a class of stochastic inventory systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 208(1), pages 155-186, September.
    18. van Delft, Ch. & Vial, J. P., 1996. "Discounted costs, obsolescence and planned stockouts with the EOQ formula," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 255-265, July.
    19. Higgins, Matthew J. & Yan, Xin & Chatterjee, Chirantan, 2021. "Unpacking the effects of adverse regulatory events: Evidence from pharmaceutical relabeling," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
    20. Mahmood Vahdani & Zeinab Sazvar & Kannan Govindan, 2022. "An integrated economic disposal and lot-sizing problem for perishable inventories with batch production and corrupt stock-dependent holding cost," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 2135-2167, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:18640. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RePub (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feeurnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.