IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ekd/003307/330700085.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Price and Welfare Effects of Agricultural Liberalization with Imperfect Competition in Food Industries and Trade

Author

Listed:
  • LABORDE David
  • LE CACHEUX Jacques

Abstract

Liberalization of the agricultural sector will prove critical to success or failure of the Doha negotiations. On the one hand, tariff and subsidies reduction will allow developing countries to specialize in the agricultural sector, following their comparative advantages. On the other hand, the fall in agricultural prices will improve the consumer welfare of the rich countries. Most of the studies about trade liberalization assume perfect competition in the food industry and we think that it is misleading. Farmers do not sell directly theirs produces to consumers. The role of the food processing industry, as an intermediary, must be taken into account and this sector may be the real winner of the trade liberalization. The purpose of this paper is to examine the consequences of an imperfect competition in the food processing market on the gains of trade liberalization. The framework of analysis is a general equilibrium model with a multi-region and multi-sector specification that follows the standard theoretical specifications of trade focused CGE models. The base year is 1997 and most of the data come from the database of the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP), version 5.3. Several comparative static analyses are carried out from this benchmark. We simulate several trade liberalization scenarios. Following an unilateral perspective, simulations is run in order toestimate the consequences of the announcement of the European Commission (December 2002) to cut by half its different restrictions to trade (tariffs, production and export subsidies) from the year 2006.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • LABORDE David & LE CACHEUX Jacques, 2010. "Price and Welfare Effects of Agricultural Liberalization with Imperfect Competition in Food Industries and Trade," EcoMod2003 330700085, EcoMod.
  • Handle: RePEc:ekd:003307:330700085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ecomod.net/sites/default/files/document-conference/ecomod2003/Laborde.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chambers,Robert G., 1988. "Applied Production Analysis," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521314275.
    2. Francois, Joseph F., 1998. "Scale Economies And Imperfect Competition In The Gtap Model," Technical Papers 28718, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    3. Hertel, Thomas, 1997. "Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and applications," GTAP Books, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, number 7685, December.
    4. Barry K. Goodwin, 1994. "Oligopsony Power: A Forgotten Dimension of Food Marketing? Discussion," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 76(5), pages 1163-1165.
    5. Burfisher, Mary E., 2001. "The Road Ahead: Agricultural Policy Reform In The Wto -- Summary Report," Agricultural Economic Reports 34067, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jacques Le Cacheux & Henri Sterdyniak, 2003. "Comment améliorer les performances économiques de l'Europe ?," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 87(4), pages 227-253.
    2. Jacques Le Cacheux, 2012. "Agriculture mondiale et européenne : défis du XXI e siècle," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(1), pages 195-234.
    3. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/2086 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/2503 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/2086 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Jacques Le Cacheux, 2004. "Negotiating the medium-term financial perspectives for the enlarged EU: The future of the European budget," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 91(5), pages 175-189.
    7. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/eu4vqp9ompqllr09hi4j38dhl is not listed on IDEAS
    8. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/eu4vqp9ompqllr09hi4j38dhl is not listed on IDEAS
    9. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/2086 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/eu4vqp9ompqllr09hi4j38dhl is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kym Anderson, 2005. "On the Virtues of Multilateral Trade Negotiations," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 81(255), pages 414-438, December.
    2. Hess, Sebastian & Surry, Yves R., 2011. "The CDET Profit Function: Could it generate a Parsimonious Agricultural Sector Model?," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114539, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Soo Yuen Chong & Jung Hur, 2007. "Overlapping Free Trade Agreements of Singapore-USA-Japan : A Computational Analysis," Trade Working Papers 21931, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    4. Kym Anderson, 2003. "Measuring Effects of Trade Policy Distortions: How Far Have We Come?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 413-440, April.
    5. Oyamada, Kazuhiko, 2013. "Parameterization of applied general equilibrium models with flexible trade specifications based on the Armington, Krugman, and Melitz models," IDE Discussion Papers 380, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    6. Antimiani, Alessandro & Conforti, Piero & Salvatici, Luca, 2006. "Assessing Market Access: Do Developing Countries Really Get a Preferential Treatment?," Working Papers 18870, TRADEAG - Agricultural Trade Agreements.
    7. Anderson, Kym, 2004. "Setting the Trade Policy Agenda: What Roles for Economists?," Working Papers 14574, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    8. Cretegny, Laurent, 2006. "Liberalizing Services in Switzerland and with the European Union," Conference papers 331543, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    9. Elbehri, Aziz & Hertel, Thomas, 2006. "A Comparative Analysis of the EU-Morocco FTA vs. Multilateral Liberalization," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 21, pages 496-525.
    10. Martin von Lampe & Aikaterini Kavallari & Heleen Bartelings & Hans van Meijl & Martin Banse & Joanna Ilicic-Komorowska & Franziska Junker & Frank van Tongeren, 2014. "Fertiliser and Biofuel Policies in the Global Agricultural Supply Chain: Implications for Agricultural Markets and Farm Incomes," OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers 69, OECD Publishing.
    11. Ariyasajjakorn, Danupon & Gander, James P. & Ratanakomut, Somchai & Reynolds, Stephen E., 2009. "ASEAN FTA, distribution of income, and globalization," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 327-335, May.
    12. Hertel, Thomas, 2013. "Global Applied General Equilibrium Analysis Using the Global Trade Analysis Project Framework," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 815-876, Elsevier.
    13. Soo Yuen Chong & Jung Hur, 2008. "Small Hubs, Large Spokes and Overlapping Free Trade Agreements," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(12), pages 1625-1665, December.
    14. Lips, Markus, 2003. "Feeding the World via Transfer Payments – A General Equilibrium Approach," Conference papers 331103, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    15. Elbehri, Aziz & Hertel, Thomas, 2006. "A Comparative Analysis of the EU-Morocco FTA vs. Multilateral Liberalization," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 21, pages 496-525.
    16. Alla A. Golub & Thomas W. Hertel, 2012. "Modeling Land-Use Change Impacts Of Biofuels In The Gtap-Bio Framework," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(03), pages 1-30.
    17. Oyamada, Kazuhiko, 2014. "Neutrality in the choice of number of firms or level of fixed costs in calibrating an Armington-Krugman-Melitz encompassing module for applied general equilibrium models," IDE Discussion Papers 465, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    18. Oyamada, Kazuhiko, 2015. "Behavioral characteristics of applied general equilibrium models with an Armington-Krugman-Melitz encompassing module," IDE Discussion Papers 525, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    19. Kym Anderson, 2016. "Agricultural Trade, Policy Reforms, and Global Food Security," Palgrave Studies in Agricultural Economics and Food Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-46925-0, August.
    20. Tsai, Diana, 2002. "Environmental Policy and Technological Innovation: Evidence from Taiwan Manufacturing Industries," Conference papers 331005, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekd:003307:330700085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Theresa Leary (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecomoea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.