IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/55103.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Search games with multiple hidden objects

Author

Listed:
  • Lidbetter, Thomas

Abstract

We consider a class of zero-sum search games in which a Searcher seeks to minimize the expected time to find several objects hidden by a Hider. We begin by analyzing a game in which the Searcher wishes to find $k$ balls hidden among $n>k$ boxes. There is a known cost of searching each box, and the Searcher seeks to minimize the total expected cost of finding all the objects in the worst case. We show that it is optimal for the Searcher to begin by searching a $k$-subset $H$ of boxes with probability $\nu(H)$, which is proportional to the product of the search costs of the boxes in $H$. The Searcher should then search the $n-k$ remaining boxes in a random order. A worst-case Hider distribution is the distribution $\nu$. We distinguish between the case of a smart Searcher who can change his search plan as he goes along and a normal Searcher who has to set out his plan from the beginning. We show that a smart Searcher has no advantage. We then show how the game can be formulated in terms of a more general network search game, and we give upper and lower bounds for the value of the game on an arbitrary network. For $2$-arc connected networks (networks that cannot be disconnected by the removal of fewer than two arcs), we solve the game for a smart Searcher and give an upper bound on the value for a normal Searcher. This bound is tight if the network is a circle.

Suggested Citation

  • Lidbetter, Thomas, 2013. "Search games with multiple hidden objects," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 55103, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:55103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/55103/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shmuel Gal, 2001. "On the optimality of a simple strategy for searching graphs," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 29(4), pages 533-542.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hellerstein, Lisa & Lidbetter, Thomas, 2023. "A game theoretic approach to a problem in polymatroid maximization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(2), pages 979-988.
    2. Steve Alpern, 2017. "Hide-and-Seek Games on a Network, Using Combinatorial Search Paths," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1207-1214, October.
    3. Alpern, Steve & Lidbetter, Thomas, 2020. "Search and Delivery Man Problems: When are depth-first paths optimal?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 965-976.
    4. Garrec, Tristan, 2019. "Continuous patrolling and hiding games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 42-51.
    5. Yolmeh, Abdolmajid & Baykal-Gürsoy, Melike, 2021. "Weighted network search games with multiple hidden objects and multiple search teams," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(1), pages 338-349.
    6. Robbert Fokkink & Thomas Lidbetter & László A. Végh, 2019. "On Submodular Search and Machine Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(4), pages 1431-1449, November.
    7. Lisa Hellerstein & Thomas Lidbetter & Daniel Pirutinsky, 2019. "Solving Zero-Sum Games Using Best-Response Oracles with Applications to Search Games," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 731-743, May.
    8. Steve Alpern & Thomas Lidbetter, 2019. "Approximate solutions for expanding search games on general networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 275(2), pages 259-279, April.
    9. Lidbetter, Thomas, 2020. "Search and rescue in the face of uncertain threats," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 1153-1160.
    10. Lidbetter, Thomas & Lin, Kyle Y., 2019. "Searching for multiple objects in multiple locations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 709-720.
    11. Wettergren, Thomas A., 2021. "Game-based modeling of independent searchers who share a common goal," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 391(C).
    12. Robbert Fokkink & Ken Kikuta & David Ramsey, 2017. "The search value of a set," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 256(1), pages 63-73, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steve Alpern, 2011. "Find-and-Fetch Search on a Tree," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1258-1268, October.
    2. Jotshi, Arun & Batta, Rajan, 2008. "Search for an immobile entity on a network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(2), pages 347-359, December.
    3. Lidbetter, Thomas, 2020. "Search and rescue in the face of uncertain threats," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 1153-1160.
    4. Lidbetter, Thomas, 2017. "On the approximation ratio of the Random Chinese Postman Tour for network search," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 782-788.
    5. Garrec, Tristan & Scarsini, Marco, 2020. "Search for an immobile hider on a stochastic network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(2), pages 783-794.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    search game; network; discrete optimization;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J50 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:55103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.