IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/49873.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Review of employee well-being and innovativeness: an opportunity for mutual benefit

Author

Listed:
  • Huhtala, Hannele
  • Parzefall, Marjo-Riitta

Abstract

By drawing on the Job Demands and Resources Model, this review article develops a conceptual framework to advance theoretical understanding of the relationship between job-related demands and resources, employee well-being and innovativeness. In conditions characterized by too high levels of demands, employees may suffer from burnout. When job resources are high, they are likely to feel engaged with their work. Burnout in turn can be seen as an inhibitor of innovativeness, and work engagement as an antecedent to innovativeness, mediating the effects of resources and demands at work on innovativeness. We further argue that innovativeness can function as a resource or a demand, depending on how it is managed. In addition to understanding the dual role of innovativeness, the identification of job-specific demands and resources is central to supporting employee well-being and, subsequently, innovativeness. The implications of the proposed conceptual framework for academic researchers and managers are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Huhtala, Hannele & Parzefall, Marjo-Riitta, 2007. "A Review of employee well-being and innovativeness: an opportunity for mutual benefit," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 49873, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:49873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/49873/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guadalupe Manzano-García & Juan-Carlos Ayala-Calvo, 2020. "Entrepreneurial Orientation: Its Relationship with the Entrepreneur’s Subjective Success in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Rabindra Kumar Pradhan & Lopamudra Hati, 2022. "The Measurement of Employee Well-being: Development and Validation of a Scale," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 23(2), pages 385-407, April.
    3. Nadir Aliane & Bassam Samir Al-Romeedy & Mohamed Fathy Agina & Perihan A. Mohsen Salah & Rabab Mahmoud Abdallah & Mohamed Abdel Hamed Abdel Fatah & Nourredine Khababa & Hazem Ahmed Khairy, 2023. "How Job Insecurity Affects Innovative Work Behavior in the Hospitality and Tourism Industry? The Roles of Knowledge Hiding Behavior and Team Anti-Citizenship Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    4. Vivi Gusrini Rahmadani & Wilmar B. Schaufeli & Jeroen Stouten & Zhenduo Zhang & Zulkarnain Zulkarnain, 2020. "Engaging Leadership and Its Implication for Work Engagement and Job Outcomes at the Individual and Team Level: A Multi-Level Longitudinal Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Daniel Hoppe & Helen Keller & Felix Horstmann, 2022. "Got Employer Image? How Applicants Choose Their Employer," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(2), pages 139-159, May.
    6. Anke Buhl & Susanne Blazejewski & Franziska Dittmer, 2016. "The More, the Merrier: Why and How Employee-Driven Eco-Innovation Enhances Environmental and Competitive Advantage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Jiequn Liu & Francis Munier, 2019. "Innovation and Entrepreneurs’ Subjective Well-being The mediation effect of job satisfaction and satisfaction with work-life balance," Working Papers of BETA 2019-42, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    8. Lotta Hassi & Satu Rekonen, 2018. "How Individual Characteristics Promote Experimentation In Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(04), pages 1-30, May.
    9. Spanuth, Thomas & Wald, Andreas, 2017. "Understanding the antecedents of organizational commitment in the context of temporary organizations: An empirical study," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 129-138.
    10. Yeh, Ying-Pin, 2014. "Exploring the impacts of employee advocacy on job satisfaction and organizational commitment: Case of Taiwanese airlines," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 94-100.
    11. Nejib Ben moussa, 2018. "The contribution of job satisfaction, organizational climate and employee commitment on management innovation in Tunisian SMEs: The effect of the post-revolution environment," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 38(4), pages 2167-2183.
    12. Jaehun Joo & Jeong-Ja Choi & Namhyun Kim, 2019. "Examining Roles of Tour Dure Producers for Social Capital and Innovativeness in Community-Based Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Vishal Gupta & Shailendra Singh & Abhijit Bhattacharya, 2017. "The Relationships Between Leadership, Work Engagement And Employee Innovative Performance: Empirical Evidence From The Indian R&D Context," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(07), pages 1-30, October.
    14. Gabriel, Kelly P. & Aguinis, Herman, 2022. "How to prevent and combat employee burnout and create healthier workplaces during crises and beyond," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 183-192.
    15. Nham Tuan Phong & Nguyen Tuyet-Mai & Tran Nam Hoai & Nguyen Hao Anh, 2020. "Knowledge sharing and innovation capability at both individual and organizational levels: An empirical study from Vietnam’s telecommunication companies," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(2), pages 275-301, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J50 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:49873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.