IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/138898.html

Foundations for a harm-based extreme wealth line

Author

Listed:
  • Robeyns, Ingrid
  • Vaughan, Michael
  • Burchardt, Tania

Abstract

In this paper, we lay out the foundations for an extreme wealth line, in both conceptual as well as motivational terms. An extreme wealth line is a social indicator that tries to capture the intuition that a person can have too much wealth, and is thus the opposite of a poverty line. An extreme wealth line is a novel proposal, that could play a crucial role in debates on high and rising levels of wealth inequality, in academia, policy-making and civil society. To conceptually develop the extreme wealth line, we first lay out the reasons to hold that one can have too much wealth. We argue that the most fruitful way to answer this question is to focus on the harms that excessive wealth causes to people, societies, economies, democracies and the planet. In this paper, we start by reviewing existing academic research on related but distinct efforts to identify 'the rich' and 'riches lines'. Next, we develop a notion of harm that is suitable for this purpose, and provide a brief survey of the different domains of harms. This allows us to develop a definition of the extreme wealth line, and also clarify what functions we believe an extreme wealth line can play and how it should be distinguished from related yet different claims. We conclude the paper by laying out an agenda for further research, that is needed to develop the extreme wealth line empirically.

Suggested Citation

  • Robeyns, Ingrid & Vaughan, Michael & Burchardt, Tania, 2026. "Foundations for a harm-based extreme wealth line," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 138898, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:138898
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/138898/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davis, Abigail & Hecht, Katharina Maria & Burchardt, Tania & Gough, Ian Roger & Hirsch, Donald & Rowlingson, Karen & Summers, Katherine Elizabeth, 2020. "Living on different incomes in London: can public consensus identify a 'riches line'?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121513, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Anthony B. Atkinson & Thomas Piketty & Emmanuel Saez, 2011. "Top Incomes in the Long Run of History," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 49(1), pages 3-71, March.
    3. Daniela Gabor, 2021. "The Wall Street Consensus," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(3), pages 429-459, May.
    4. Albertazzi, Andrea & Lown, Patrick & Mengel, Friederike, 2025. "Income inequality and social trust," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    5. Alvaredo, Facundo & Atkinson, Anthony B. & Morelli, Salvatore, 2018. "Top wealth shares in the UK over more than a century," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 26-47.
    6. Brett Christophers, 2022. "Mind the rent gap: Blackstone, housing investment and the reordering of urban rent surfaces," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(4), pages 698-716, March.
    7. David V Axelsen & Lasse Nielsen, 2025. "The expressive injustice of being rich," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 24(4), pages 291-312, November.
    8. Ingrid Robeyns & Vincent Buskens & Arnout Rijt & Nina Vergeldt & Tanja Lippe, 2021. "How Rich is Too Rich? Measuring the Riches Line," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 115-143, February.
    9. Emmanuel Saez & Gabriel Zucman, 2016. "Editor's Choice Wealth Inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from Capitalized Income Tax Data," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 131(2), pages 519-578.
    10. Davis, Abigail & Hecht, Katharina & Burchardt, Tania & Gough, Ian & Hirsch, Donald & Rowlingson, Karen & Summers, Kate, 2020. "SUMMARY – living on different incomes in London: can public consensus identify a 'riches line'?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121515, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Tania Burchardt & Abigail Davis & Ian Gough & Katharina Hecht & Donald Hirsch & Karen Rowlingson & Kate Summers, 2020. "Living on Different Incomes in London: Can public consensus identify a 'riches line'?," CASE Reports casereport127, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Horn, Stefan & Gough, Ian & Rogers, Charlotte & Tunstall, Rebecca, 2025. "Meeting housing needs within planetary boundaries: A UK case study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    2. Atanu Ghoshray & Issam Malki & Javier Ordóñez, 2022. "On the long-run dynamics of income and wealth inequality," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 375-408, February.
    3. repec:osf:socarx:j23pn_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Nora Lustig, 2019. "The “Missing Rich” in Household Surveys: Causes and Correction Approaches," Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper Series 75, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    5. Mauricio De Rosa, 2022. "Accumulation, inheritance and wealth distribution: first estimates of the untold half," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 22-07, Instituto de Economía - IECON.
    6. Facundo Alvaredo & Lucas Chancel & Thomas Piketty & Emmanuel Saez & Gabriel Zucman, 2017. "Global Inequality Dynamics: New Findings from WID.world," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(5), pages 404-409, May.
    7. Tamai, Toshiki, 2026. "Public investment, economic growth, and wealth distribution," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    8. Nora Lustig, 2018. "Measuring the Distribution of Household Income, Consumption and Wealth: State of Play and Measurement Challenges," Working Papers 1801, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    9. Alstadsæter, Annette & Johannesen, Niels & Zucman, Gabriel, 2018. "Who owns the wealth in tax havens? Macro evidence and implications for global inequality," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 89-100.
    10. Korom, Philipp, 2016. "Inherited advantage: The importance of inheritance for private wealth accumulation in Europe," MPIfG Discussion Paper 16/11, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    11. Thomas Fischer, 2017. "Can Redistribution by Means of a Progressive Labor Income-Taxation Transfer System Increase Financial Stability?," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 20(2), pages 1-3.
    12. Johannes König & Christian Schluter & Carsten Schröder, 2025. "Routes to the Top," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 71(2), May.
    13. Baselgia, Enea & Martínez, Isabel Z., 2024. "Using Rich Lists to Study the Super-Rich and Top Wealth Inequality: Insights from Switzerland," CEPR Discussion Papers 18891, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    14. Carranza, Rafael & De Rosa, Mauricio & Flores, Ignacio, 2023. "Wealth Inequality in Latin America," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 12906, Inter-American Development Bank.
    15. Wildauer, Rafael & Kapeller, Jakob, 2022. "Tracing the invisible rich: A new approach to modelling Pareto tails in survey data," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    16. Paolo Acciari & Facundo Alvaredo & Salvatore Morelli, 2024. "The Concentration of Personal Wealth in Italy 1995–2016," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 22(3), pages 1228-1274.
    17. Facundo Alvaredo & Yonatan Berman & Salvatore Morelli, 2025. "Evidence from the Dead: New Estimates of Wealth Inequality based on the Distribution of Estates," Working Papers halshs-04934624, HAL.
    18. Annette Alstadsæter & Niels Johannesen & Gabriel Zucman, 2019. "Tax Evasion and Inequality," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(6), pages 2073-2103, June.
    19. Boehl, Gregor & Fischer, Thomas, 2017. "Capital Taxation and Investment: Matching 100 Years of Wealth Inequality Dynamics," Working Papers 2017:8, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    20. Arrigoni, Simone, 2024. "Who gets the flow? Financial globalisation and wealth inequality," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    21. Bertrand Garbinti & Jonathan Goupille-Lebret & Thomas Piketty, 2021. "Accounting for Wealth-Inequality Dynamics: Methods, Estimates, and Simulations for France," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 19(1), pages 620-663.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • I32 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:138898. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.