IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/127520.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Conditional likelihood ratio test with many weak instruments

Author

Listed:
  • Ayyar, Sree
  • Matsushita, Yukitoshi
  • Otsu, Taisuke

Abstract

This article extends the validity of the conditional likelihood ratio (CLR) test developed by Moreira (2003, Econometrica 71(4), 1027-–1048) to instrumental variable regression models with unknown homoskedastic error variance and many weak instruments. We argue that the conventional CLR test with estimated error variance loses exact similarity and is asymptotically invalid in this setting. We propose a modified critical value function for the likelihood ratio (LR) statistic with estimated error variance, and prove that our modified test achieves asymptotic validity under many weak instruments asymptotics. Our critical value function is constructed by representing the LR using four statistics, instead of two as in Moreira (2003, Econometrica 71(4), 1027-–1048). A simulation study illustrates the desirable finite sample properties of our test.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayyar, Sree & Matsushita, Yukitoshi & Otsu, Taisuke, 2025. "Conditional likelihood ratio test with many weak instruments," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 127520, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:127520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/127520/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcelo J. Moreira, 2003. "A Conditional Likelihood Ratio Test for Structural Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 71(4), pages 1027-1048, July.
    2. Frank Kleibergen, 2002. "Pivotal Statistics for Testing Structural Parameters in Instrumental Variables Regression," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 70(5), pages 1781-1803, September.
    3. Isaiah Andrews & James H. Stock & Liyang Sun, 2019. "Weak Instruments in Instrumental Variables Regression: Theory and Practice," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 727-753, August.
    4. Anderson, T.W. & Kunitomo, Naoto & Matsushita, Yukitoshi, 2010. "On the asymptotic optimality of the LIML estimator with possibly many instruments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 157(2), pages 191-204, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dennis Lim & Wenjie Wang & Yichong Zhang, 2022. "A Conditional Linear Combination Test with Many Weak Instruments," Papers 2207.11137, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    2. Lim, Dennis & Wang, Wenjie & Zhang, Yichong, 2024. "A conditional linear combination test with many weak instruments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 238(2).
    3. Wenjie Wang & Yichong Zhang, 2021. "Wild Bootstrap for Instrumental Variables Regressions with Weak and Few Clusters," Papers 2108.13707, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    4. Michael Keane & Timothy Neal, 2021. "A Practical Guide to Weak Instruments," Discussion Papers 2021-05b, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    5. Purevdorj Tuvaandorj, 2021. "Robust Permutation Tests in Linear Instrumental Variables Regression," Papers 2111.13774, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2024.
    6. Wang, Wenjie, 2021. "Wild Bootstrap for Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments and Few Clusters," MPRA Paper 106227, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Jens Klooster & Mikhail Zhelonkin, 2024. "Outlier robust inference in the instrumental variable model with applications to causal effects," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(1), pages 86-106, January.
    8. Keane, Michael & Neal, Timothy, 2023. "Instrument strength in IV estimation and inference: A guide to theory and practice," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 1625-1653.
    9. Manuel Denzer & Constantin Weiser, 2021. "Beyond F-statistic - A General Approach for Assessing Weak Identification," Working Papers 2107, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    10. Wang, Wenjie & Kaffo, Maximilien, 2016. "Bootstrap inference for instrumental variable models with many weak instruments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 231-268.
    11. Yukun Ma, 2023. "Identification-robust inference for the LATE with high-dimensional covariates," Papers 2302.09756, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    12. Carlos Velasco & Xuexin Wang, 2021. "Instrumental variable estimation via a continuum of instruments with an application to estimating the elasticity of intertemporal substitution in consumption," Working Papers 2024-09-06, Wang Yanan Institute for Studies in Economics (WISE), Xiamen University.
    13. Michael Keane & Timothy Neal, 2021. "A New Perspective on Weak Instruments," Discussion Papers 2021-05a, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    14. Peter C. B. Phillips, 2022. "An Econometrician amongst Statisticians: T. W. Anderson," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2333, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    15. Dennis Lim & Wenjie Wang & Yichong Zhang, 2024. "A Dimension-Agnostic Bootstrap Anderson-Rubin Test For Instrumental Variable Regressions," Papers 2412.01603, arXiv.org.
    16. Doko Tchatoka, Firmin Sabro, 2012. "Specification Tests with Weak and Invalid Instruments," MPRA Paper 40185, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Antoine, Bertille & Lavergne, Pascal, 2023. "Identification-robust nonparametric inference in a linear IV model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 1-24.
    18. Leandro M. Magnusson, 2010. "Inference in limited dependent variable models robust to weak identification," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 13(3), pages 56-79, October.
    19. A. Belloni & D. Chen & V. Chernozhukov & C. Hansen, 2012. "Sparse Models and Methods for Optimal Instruments With an Application to Eminent Domain," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 80(6), pages 2369-2429, November.
    20. Frank Kleibergen, 2004. "Expansions of GMM statistics that indicate their properties under weak and/or many instruments and the bootstrap," Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings 408, Econometric Society.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:127520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.