IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Exploring the Black Box of Task-Technology Fit: The Case of Mobile Information Systems

  • Gebauer, Judith

    (U of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)

  • Ginsburg, Mark

    (Seventh Rank Associates)

Registered author(s):

    Task-technology fit has been developed as a diagnostic tool to determine whether information systems meet user needs, and has been demonstrated to have a positive impact on the effectiveness of various types of information systems, such as group support systems and management support systems. Despite empirical evidence for the relevance of task-technology fit to improve information system effectiveness, the theory of task-technology fit provides little guidance of how to determine and operationalize fit for particular combinations of task and technology. Consequently, the theoretical validity of the concept of task-technology fit remains limited as does its practical applicability. In this paper, we present the results of an inductive study to explore the concept and antecedents of fit for mobile information systems to support mobile professionals. We performed a content analysis of online user reviews of four mobile technology products with the objective to identify issues that are relevant to users. The mobile technology products include a cell-phone, two personal digital assistants (PDAs), and an ultra-light laptop. The identified issues can be grouped into four conceptual constructs: overall user evaluation, task-related fit, context-related fit, and technology performance, and are characterized by a lower level of abstraction than the level of abstraction deployed in previous research studies on task-technology fit. In order to improve our understanding about how to achieve fit for particular combinations of task, use context, and technology we performed several statistical analyses. (1) An exploratory factor analysis yielded five factors, each indeed including a different set of conceptual constructs; (2) a case-wise analysis indicated user-perceived strengths and limits of individual devices with respect to the five factors; and (3) the results of a multiple regression analysis provided insights about the extent to which the five factors were related with overall technology evaluation. The results presented in the current paper will serve as input for a larger survey.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business in its series Working Papers with number 06-0120.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 2006
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:ecl:illbus:06-0120
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Dale L. Goodhue, 1995. "Understanding User Evaluations of Information Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(12), pages 1827-1844, December.
    2. Gebauer, Judith & Shaw, Michael J. & Gribbins, Michele L., 2006. "Task-Technology Fit for Mobile Information Systems," Working Papers 06-0107, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:illbus:06-0120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.