IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecb/ecbops/2025370.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Different shades of green: EU corporate disclosure rules and their effectiveness in limiting “greenwashing”

Author

Listed:
  • Papathanassiou, Chryssa
  • Nieto, María J.

Abstract

Greenwashing is a generic term used for breaches and misleading claims about the sustainability credentials of various legal provisions, ranging from unfair competition, securities laws infringements and unethical advertising to wrong corporate disclosure. This paper focuses on the latter. Against the background of the significant financial flows needed to finance the transition to meet the objectives of the Paris Agreement and the EU Climate law, the EU corporate sustainability reporting rules integrated in the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), as well as the EU taxonomy constitute an ambitious legislative framework which is aimed at establishing common mandatory European Sustainability Reporting Standards for companies to report comparable and relevant information required by investors and other stakeholders. This framework’s aim is to support companies in the transition to a more sustainable economy and help stakeholders and investors understand the sustainability risks in their investments (and facilitate financial flows for the transition). This framework’s aim is to support companies in the transition to a more sustainable economy and help stakeholders and investors understand the sustainability risks in their investments (and facilitate financial flows for the transition). This will help mitigate greenwashing risks because this framework raises the responsibility for inaccurate disclosure. In addition, accurate data are important for central bank operations because they can ensure that prices and the risk control framework adequately reflect climate physical and transition risks. The success of the regulatory framework will rely heavily on its credible implementation, including penalties, which will help anchor expectations and condition the behaviour of economic agents. […]

Suggested Citation

  • Papathanassiou, Chryssa & Nieto, María J., 2025. "Different shades of green: EU corporate disclosure rules and their effectiveness in limiting “greenwashing”," Occasional Paper Series 370, European Central Bank.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecb:ecbops:2025370
    Note: 98629
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ecb.europa.eu//pub/pdf/scpops/ecb~ae799b1df9.op370en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irene Monasterolo & María J. Nieto & Edo Schets, 2023. "The good, the bad and the hot house world: conceptual underpinnings of the NGFS scenarios and suggestions for improvement," Occasional Papers 2302, Banco de España.
    2. Monasterolo, Irene & Pacelli, Antonia & Pagano, Marco & Russo, Carmine, 2024. "A European Climate Bond," CEPR Discussion Papers 18988, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Alessi, Lucia & Battiston, Stefano & Melo, Ana Sofia, 2021. "Travelling down the green brick road: a status quo assessment of the EU taxonomy," Macroprudential Bulletin, European Central Bank, vol. 15.
    4. Maria Jua Bachelet & Leonardo Becchetti & Stefano Manfredonia, 2019. "The Green Bonds Premium Puzzle: The Role of Issuer Characteristics and Third-Party Verification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Pietsch, Allegra & Salakhova, Dilyara, 2022. "Pricing of green bonds: drivers and dynamics of the greenium," Working Paper Series 2728, European Central Bank.
    6. Mizan Khan & Stacy-ann Robinson & Romain Weikmans & David Ciplet & J. Timmons Roberts, 2020. "Twenty-five years of adaptation finance through a climate justice lens," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 251-269, July.
    7. Caterina Lucarelli & Camilla Mazzoli & Michela Rancan & Sabrina Severini, 2023. "The Impact Of Eu Taxonomy On Corporate Investments," Journal of Financial Management, Markets and Institutions (JFMMI), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(01), pages 1-32, June.
    8. Mizan Khan & Stacy-ann Robinson & Romain Weikmans & David Ciplet & J. Timmons Roberts, 2020. "Correction to: Twenty-five years of adaptation finance through a climate justice lens," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 271-271, July.
    9. Frederik Dahlmann & Layla Branicki & Stephen Brammer, 2019. "Managing Carbon Aspirations: The Influence of Corporate Climate Change Targets on Environmental Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 1-24, August.
    10. Florian Berg & Julian F Kölbel & Roberto Rigobon, 2022. "Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings [Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: theory and empirical evidence]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(6), pages 1315-1344.
    11. Mark Trexler & Auden Schendler, 2015. "Science-Based Carbon Targets for the Corporate World: The Ultimate Sustainability Commitment, or a Costly Distraction?," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 19(6), pages 931-933, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dylan Bugden & Jesse Brazil, 2024. "The role of geostrategic interests in motivating public support for foreign climate aid," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 14(4), pages 803-813, December.
    2. Kristina Fidali & Ofusina Toamua & Hemah Aquillah & Sereima Lomaloma & Placida Riah Mauriasi & Steve Nasiu & Aliti Vunisea & Sangeeta Mangubhai, 2023. "Can civil society organizations and faith‐based organizations in Fiji, Samoa, and Solomon Islands access climate finance?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(S2), December.
    3. Heidi K. Edmonds & C. A. Knox Lovell & Julie E. Lovell, 2022. "The Inequities of National Adaptation to Climate Change," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    4. P. P. Stoll & W. P. Pauw & F. Tohme & C. Grüning, 2021. "Mobilizing private adaptation finance: lessons learned from the Green Climate Fund," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Kalia Ruth Barkai & Harald Winkler, 2025. "Developing a framework for assessing equity in national contributions to the global goal on adaptation," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 79-106, March.
    6. Marcelo Furlan & Enzo Barberio Mariano, 2024. "Effects of democracy, social inequality and economic growth on climate justice: An analysis with structural equation modelling," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 48(2), pages 435-467, May.
    7. Antoine Mandel & Timothy Tiggeloven & Daniel Lincke & Elco Koks & Philip Ward & Jochen Hinkel, 2021. "Risks on global financial stability induced by climate change: the case of flood risks," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 1-24, May.
    8. Martijn Boermans, 2023. "Preferred habitat investors in the green bond market," Working Papers 773, DNB.
    9. Ivan Diaz-Rainey & Paul A. Griffin & David H. Lont & Antonio J. Mateo-Márquez & Constancio Zamora-Ramírez, 2024. "Shareholder Activism on Climate Change: Evolution, Determinants, and Consequences," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 193(3), pages 481-510, September.
    10. Carole‐Anne Sénit & Frank Biermann, 2021. "In Whose Name Are You Speaking? The Marginalization of the Poor in Global Civil Society," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(5), pages 581-591, November.
    11. Lorenzo Mercuri & Andrea Perchiazzo & Edit Rroji, 2023. "Investigating Short-Term Dynamics in Green Bond Markets," Papers 2308.12179, arXiv.org.
    12. Chao Li & Xing Su & Chao Fan & Jun Wang & Xiangyu Wang, 2025. "A Sustainable Circular Framework for Financing Infrastructure Climate Adaptation: Integrated Carbon Markets," Papers 2501.08004, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2025.
    13. Joachim Peter Tilsted & Anders Bjørn, 2023. "Green frontrunner or indebted culprit? Assessing Denmark’s climate targets in light of fair contributions under the Paris Agreement," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(8), pages 1-22, August.
    14. Leslie Lipper & Romina Cavatassi & Ricci Symons & Alashiya Gordes & Oliver Page, 2021. "Financing adaptation for resilient livelihoods under food system transformation: the role of Multilateral Development Banks," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(6), pages 1525-1540, December.
    15. Alexander Dryden & Enrico Pulieri, 2025. "The Price of Trust: Greenium and Greenwashing in Asia’s Green Bond Markets," Working Papers 266, Department of Economics, SOAS University of London, UK.
    16. Caramichael, John & Rapp, Andreas C., 2024. "The green corporate bond issuance premium," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    17. Sarina Yusoff & Nur Hafizah Yusoff, 2022. "Disaster Risks Management through Adaptive Actions from Human-Based Perspective: Case Study of 2014 Flood Disaster," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    18. Pagnottoni, Paolo & Spelta, Alessandro & Flori, Andrea & Pammolli, Fabio, 2022. "Climate change and financial stability: Natural disaster impacts on global stock markets," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 599(C).
    19. Miklesh Yadav & Nandita Mishra & Shruti Ashok, 2023. "Dynamic connectedness of green bond with financial markets of European countries under OECD economies," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 609-631, February.
    20. Spira, Robin, 2024. "How does ESG rating disagreement influence analyst forecast dispersion?," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 9(3), pages 1769-1804.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    climate; disclosure; greenwashing; sustainability;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecb:ecbops:2025370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Official Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/emieude.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.