IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Some Theory, Some Ideology and Lots of Pragmatism in the Cost-Benefit Analysis of PPPs


  • Antonio Estache


This paper reviews the theoretical debates on the extent to which PPP demands changes in how cost-benefit analysis needs to be conducted for public projects. It presents first a simple conceptual discussion which shows that the comparison between PPP and public procurement boils down to: (i) the difference between the discount rate and the total cost difference between the best PPP bid and the best public sector option (including in the cost difference the allocation of operational risks and the likelihood of these risks). It then looks at international practice and shows that pragmatism, and sometimes ideology, dominates theory in the use of cost benefit analysis to compare the two forms of provision.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Estache, 2012. "Some Theory, Some Ideology and Lots of Pragmatism in the Cost-Benefit Analysis of PPPs," Working Papers ECARES ECARES 2012-027, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  • Handle: RePEc:eca:wpaper:2013/126487

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: 2012-027-ESTACHE-sometheory
    Download Restriction: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Alain Bonnafous, 2006. "Projets en PPP et choix des investissements Commentaire sur l'article : Pierre Kopp, Rémy Prud'homme," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 116(6), pages 871-877.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eca:wpaper:2013/126487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Benoit Pauwels). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.