Some Theory, Some Ideology and Lots of Pragmatism in the Cost-Benefit Analysis of PPPs
This paper reviews the theoretical debates on the extent to which PPP demands changes in how cost-benefit analysis needs to be conducted for public projects. It presents first a simple conceptual discussion which shows that the comparison between PPP and public procurement boils down to: (i) the difference between the discount rate and the total cost difference between the best PPP bid and the best public sector option (including in the cost difference the allocation of operational risks and the likelihood of these risks). It then looks at international practice and shows that pragmatism, and sometimes ideology, dominates theory in the use of cost benefit analysis to compare the two forms of provision.
|Date of creation:||Aug 2012|
|Date of revision:|
|Publication status:||Published by:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Av. F.D., Roosevelt, 39, 1050 Bruxelles|
Phone: (32 2) 650 30 75
Fax: (32 2) 650 44 75
Web page: http://difusion.ulb.ac.be
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Alain Bonnafous, 2006. "Projets en PPP et choix des investissements Commentaire sur l'article : Pierre Kopp, Rémy Prud'homme," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 116(6), pages 871-877.
- Alain Bonnafous, 2006. "Projets en PPP et choix des investissements Commentaire sur l'article : Pierre Kopp, Rémy Prud'homme," Post-Print halshs-00371669, HAL.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eca:wpaper:2013/126487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Benoit Pauwels)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.