IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dpr/wpaper/1278.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

International Knowledge Diffusion and Productivity Growth in a Cash-in-Advance Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Colin Davis
  • Ken-ichi Hashimoto

Abstract

This paper investigates how the cash-in-advance (CIA) constraints that firms face in production and innovation decisions affect the long-run relationship between monetary policy and innovation-based economic growth. Firms produce differentiated product varieties and invest in process innovation to reduce production costs. With imperfect knowledge diffusion across countries, the country with the greater share of industry has relatively productive firms. We find that when innovation has a stricter CIA requirement than production, an increase in the nominal interest rate in the country with the larger (smaller) share of industry reduces the industrial share of that country, thereby decreasing (increasing) the rate of productivity growth. We also examine the implications of improvements in knowledge diffusion for the optimal nominal interest rate policy of each country.

Suggested Citation

  • Colin Davis & Ken-ichi Hashimoto, 2025. "International Knowledge Diffusion and Productivity Growth in a Cash-in-Advance Economy," ISER Discussion Paper 1278, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka.
    • Handle: RePEc:dpr:wpaper:1278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://demo.iser.osaka-u.ac.jp/static/resources/docs/dp/DP1278.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Federico Etro, 2009. "Endogenous Market Structures and the Macroeconomy," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-540-87427-0, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marta Aloi & Joanna Poyago-Theotoky & Frédéric Tournemaine, 2022. "The Geography of Knowledge and R&D-led Growth [Real effects ofacademic research: comment]," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(6), pages 1149-1190.
    2. Etro, Federico & Rossi, Lorenza, 2015. "Optimal monetary policy under Calvo pricing with Bertrand competition," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 423-440.
    3. Chu, Angus C. & Ji, Lei, 2016. "Monetary Policy And Endogenous Market Structure In A Schumpeterian Economy," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(5), pages 1127-1145, July.
    4. Colin Davis & Ken-ichi Hashimoto, 2019. "Innovation Offshoring with Fully Endogenous Growth," ISER Discussion Paper 1055, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka.
    5. Chang, Cheng-wei & Lai, Ching-chong, 2012. "Markups and the number of firms in a simple model of imperfect competition," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 116(3), pages 277-280.
    6. Etro, Federico & Rossi, Lorenza, 2015. "New-Keynesian Phillips curve with Bertrand competition and endogenous entry," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 318-340.
    7. Maurizio Iacopetta & Raoul Minetti & Pietro F Peretto, 2019. "Financial Markets, Industry Dynamics and Growth," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 129(621), pages 2192-2215.
    8. Varvarigos, Dimitrios & Gil-Moltó, Maria José, 2016. "Endogenous Market Structure, Occupational Choice, And Growth Cycles," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 70-94, January.
    9. Jérôme Creel & Maurizio Iacopetta, 2015. "Macroeconomic policy and potential growth," Working Papers hal-03459896, HAL.
    10. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/5gcvpatejr92bbog69gpen3cmn is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Marta Aloi & Huw Dixon & Anthony Savagar, 2021. "Labor Responses, Regulation, and Business Churn," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 53(1), pages 119-156, February.
    12. Federico Etro & Michela Cella, 2013. "Equilibrium Principal‐Agent Contracts: Competition and R&D Incentives," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 488-512, September.
    13. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5gcvpatejr92bbog69gpen3cmn is not listed on IDEAS
    14. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/3d1rt55ran82d86guhaponket6 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Federico Etro, 2010. "Endogenous market structures and antitrust policy," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 57(1), pages 9-45, March.
    16. Savagar, Anthony & Dixon, Huw, 2020. "Firm entry, excess capacity and endogenous productivity," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    17. Colin Davis & Ken‐ichi Hashimoto, 2018. "Corporate Tax Policy And Industry Location With Fully Endogenous Productivity Growth," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 56(2), pages 1136-1148, April.
    18. Savagar, Anthony, 2021. "Measured productivity with endogenous markups and economic profits," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    19. Maurizio Iacopetta & Raoul Minetti & Pierluigi Murro, 2020. "Growing Through Spinoffs," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03389197, HAL.
    20. Maurizio Iacopetta & Raoul Minetti & Pierluigi Murro, 2020. "Growing through Spinoffs. Corporate Governance, Entry, and Innovation," Documents de Travail de l'OFCE 2020-13, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE).
    21. Colin Davis & Ken-ichi Hashimoto, 2016. "Economic Integration, Monopoly Power and Productivity Growth without Scale Effects," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 152-163, February.
    22. Maria José Gil-Moltó & Dimitrios Varvarigos, 2012. "Industry Dynamics and Indeterminacy in an OLG Economy with Endogenous Occupational Choice," Discussion Papers in Economics 12/09, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester, revised Sep 2012.
    23. Chu, Angus C. & Furukawa, Yuichi, 2012. "Patents versus R&D subsidies in a Schumpeterian growth model with endogenous market structure," MPRA Paper 41083, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Sep 2012.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dpr:wpaper:1278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Librarian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isosujp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.