IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/diw/diwrup/39de.html

Europäische Perspektive für Versorgungssicherheit auf Strommärkten notwendig

Author

Listed:
  • Sophia Rüster
  • Sebastian Schwenen

Abstract

Der deutsche Atomausstieg in 2022 und die gleichzeitig stetig steigende Stromerzeugung durch fluktuierende Wind- und Sonnenenergie heizen in Deutschland, wie in Europa, seit geraumer Zeit eine Diskussion um die Versorgungssicherheitauf dem Strommarkt an. Dabei ist völlig unklar, wie Versorgungssicherheit – vor allem in der mittleren und langen Frist – gemessen werden soll. Das Fehlen eines klaren Konzeptes für eine sinnvolle Abschätzung von Versorgungssicherheit ist ein Grund, warum die Meinungen über regulatorische Eingriffe zur Gewährleistung der Versorgungssicherheit weit auseinandergehen. Die Konzepte zur Messung von Versorgungssicherheit sind meist konservativ, überschätzen das Risiko knapper Stromversorgung durch ein Unterschätzen länderübergreifender Synergien, und regen somit die Diskussion um regulatorische Eingriffe weiter an.

Suggested Citation

  • Sophia Rüster & Sebastian Schwenen, 2014. "Europäische Perspektive für Versorgungssicherheit auf Strommärkten notwendig," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 39, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwrup:39de
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.484864.de/DIW_Roundup_39_de.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karsten Neuhoff & Jochen Diekmann & Wolf-Peter Schill & Sebastian Schwenen, 2013. "Strategische Reserve zur Absicherung des Strommarkts," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 80(48), pages 5-15.
    2. repec:aen:eeepjl:2_2_a02 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karsten Neuhoff & Sophia Rüster & Sebastian Schwenen, 2015. "Power Market Design beyond 2020: Time to Revisit Key Elements?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1456, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karsten Neuhoff & Sophia Rüster & Sebastian Schwenen, 2015. "Power Market Design beyond 2020: Time to Revisit Key Elements?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1456, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Bublitz, Andreas & Keles, Dogan & Zimmermann, Florian & Fraunholz, Christoph & Fichtner, Wolf, 2018. "A survey on electricity market design: Insights from theory and real-world implementations of capacity remuneration mechanisms," Working Paper Series in Production and Energy 27, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Industrial Production (IIP).
    3. Wolf-Peter Schill & Jochen Diekmann, 2014. "Die Kontroverse um Kapazitätsmechanismen für den deutschen Strommarkt," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 5, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    4. Bublitz, Andreas & Keles, Dogan & Zimmermann, Florian & Fraunholz, Christoph & Fichtner, Wolf, 2019. "A survey on electricity market design: Insights from theory and real-world implementations of capacity remuneration mechanisms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1059-1078.
    5. Neuhoff, Karsten & Diekmann, Jochen & Kunz, Friedrich & Rüster, Sophia & Schill, Wolf-Peter & Schwenen, Sebastian, 2016. "A coordinated strategic reserve to safeguard the European energy transition," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 252-263.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwrup:39de. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.