IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dal/wpaper/daleconwp2026-02.html

Great Plains, Few Peaks: The Global Landscape of Egalitarian Beliefs

Author

Listed:
  • Insa Bechert
  • Lars Osberg

    (GESIS-Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences
    Department of Economics, Dalhousie University)

Abstract

Using the 2019 International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) data on what 51,582 respondents in 34 countries thought different occupations “should earn”, this paper examines the importance of cross-national average differences in “fair pay ratio” beliefs relative to within-country differences in attitudes. It argues that a large majority of the population in all countries thinks that fair wage inequality would imply CEO/worker pay ratios that are (a) remarkably small compared to actual pay ratios and (b) remarkably similar. Because majority beliefs about the “fair” CEO/worker pay ratio are quite similar almost everywhere, cross-country comparisons of average attitudes towards fair pay ratios aggregate an egalitarian majority with an inegalitarian minority, whose beliefs differ from the egalitarian majority to differing degrees in different countries. The interesting question for analysis of cross-national differences in public redistributive policies therefore is why and how much the preferences of inegalitarian minorities within countries differ from those of the egalitarian majorities and how those minority preferences can become influential.

Suggested Citation

  • Insa Bechert & Lars Osberg, 2026. "Great Plains, Few Peaks: The Global Landscape of Egalitarian Beliefs," Working Papers daleconwp2026-02, Dalhousie University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:dal:wpaper:daleconwp2026-02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wp.economics.dal.ca/RePEc/dal/wpaper/DalEconWP2026-02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alesina, Alberto & La Ferrara, Eliana, 2005. "Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(5-6), pages 897-931, June.
    2. Alberto Alesina & Paola Giuliano & Nathan Nunn, 2013. "On the Origins of Gender Roles: Women and the Plough," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 128(2), pages 469-530.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Torun Dewan & Christopher Kam & Jaakko Meriläinen & Janne Tukiainen, 2026. "Class, Social Mobility, and Voting in Democratizing and Industrializing England," Discussion Papers 179, Aboa Centre for Economics.
    2. Bozzano, Monica & Profeta, Paola & Puglisi, Riccardo & Scabrosetti, Simona, 2024. "Women’s voice on redistribution: From gender equality to equalizing taxation," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Bertocchi, Graziella & Dimico, Arcangelo & Tedeschi, Gian Luca, 2026. "Ancestral Inequality and Preferences for Redistribution," CEPR Discussion Papers 21490, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    4. Jordahl, Henrik & Mavisakalyan, Astghik & Poutvaara, Panu, 2025. "Attractiveness and preferences for redistribution in non-Western countries," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 90(PB).
    5. Hortas-Rico, Miriam & Rodríguez-Crespo, Ernesto, 2025. "How does women's political empowerment relate to subjective well-being? The moderating role of institutional quality," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    6. Lecce, Giampaolo & Ogliari, Laura, 2019. "Institutional Transplant and Cultural Proximity: Evidence from Nineteenth-Century Prussia," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 79(4), pages 1060-1093, December.
    7. Roth, Christopher & Wohlfart, Johannes, 2018. "Experienced inequality and preferences for redistribution," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 251-262.
    8. Marco Colagrossi & Claudio Deiana & Andrea Geraci & Ludovica Giua, 2022. "Hang up on stereotypes: Domestic violence and an anti‐abuse helpline campaign," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 40(4), pages 585-611, October.
    9. Michele Bernasconi & Giulio Cinquanta & Valentino Dardanoni & Vincenzo Prete, 2025. "Mobility Comparisons: Theoretical Definitions and People’s Perceptions," Games, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, May.
    10. D’Acunto, Francesco & Ghosh, Pulak & Rossi, Alberto G., 2026. "How costly are cultural biases? Evidence from FinTech," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    11. Corneo, Giacomo & Fong, Christina M., 2008. "What's the monetary value of distributive justice," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(1-2), pages 289-308, February.
    12. Victor Hiller, 2014. "Gender Inequality, Endogenous Cultural Norms, and Economic Development," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 116(2), pages 455-481, April.
    13. Robert MacCulloch & Silvia Pezzini, 2010. "The Roles of Freedom, Growth, and Religion in the Taste for Revolution," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 53(2), pages 329-358, May.
    14. István György Tóth & Keller, T., 2011. "GINI DP 7: Income Distributions, Inequality Perceptions and Redistributive Claims in European Societies," GINI Discussion Papers 7, AIAS, Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies.
    15. Bottazzi, Laura & Lusardi, Annamaria, 2021. "Stereotypes in financial literacy: Evidence from PISA," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    16. Mekonnen, Daniel Ayalew & Gerber, Nicolas & Matz, Julia Anna, 2018. "Gendered Social Networks, Agricultural Innovations, and Farm Productivity in Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 321-335.
    17. Collewet, Marion & Fairley, Kim & Kessels, Roselinde & Knoef, Marike & van Vliet, Olaf, 2024. "The design of welfare: unraveling taxpayers' preferences," OSF Preprints 4am7e, Center for Open Science.
    18. Bjorvatn, Kjetil & Falch, Ranveig & Hernæs, Ulrikke, 2016. "Gender, context and competition: Experimental evidence from rural and urban Uganda," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 31-37.
    19. Tendai Zawaira & Matthew W. Clance & Carolyn Chisadza, 2020. "Social Institutions and Gender-Biased Outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa," Working Papers 2020101, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    20. Daniele, Gianmarco & Geys, Benny, 2012. "Public support for institutionalised solidarity: Europeans' reaction to the establishment of eurobonds," Discussion Papers, Research Professorship & Project "The Future of Fiscal Federalism" SP II 2012-112, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dal:wpaper:daleconwp2026-02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: James McNeil (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dedalca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.