IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The effect of spatial mobility and other factors on academic productivity : some evidence from a set of highly productive economists


  • Albarrán, Pedro
  • Carrasco, Raquel
  • Ruiz-Castillo, Javier


This paper compares the average productivity of those in brain drain (migrants), brain circulation (temporary migrants) and stayers (whose entire career takes place in their country of origin) in a set of 2,530 highly productive economists that work in 2007 in a selection of the top 81 Economics departments worldwide. There are three main findings. Firstly, among nationals from the eleven countries other than the U.S. with at least one department in the sample, migrants are positively selected relative to stayers –exacerbating the brain drain problem from the sending countries point of view. Moreover, those in brain circulation are negatively selected relative to those brain-drained into the U.S. but are also generally more productive than stayers. Secondly, among U.S. nationals, the ranking is very different: brain circulation, followed by stayers, and brain drain. From a global point of view, the selection effects summarized in these two points can be seen as contributing to the best allocation of resources. Thirdly, comparisons between the average productivity of foreigners and stayers in a given geographical area are very much affected by two factors: the quality threshold that defines the base to which foreigners are compared, and the type of department where comparisons take place in a partition into five department categories. For example, in the bottom 56 departments foreigners are more productive than stayers in the total sample, but the two groups are indistinguishable in an elite consisting of 833 economists with above average productivity. In the top 25 U.S. departments the two groups are equally productive, both in the total sample and in the elite.

Suggested Citation

  • Albarrán, Pedro & Carrasco, Raquel & Ruiz-Castillo, Javier, 2015. "The effect of spatial mobility and other factors on academic productivity : some evidence from a set of highly productive economists," UC3M Working papers. Economics we1415, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
  • Handle: RePEc:cte:werepe:we1415

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Levin, Sharon G & Stephan, Paula E, 1991. "Research Productivity over the Life Cycle: Evidence for Academic Scientists," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 81(1), pages 114-132, March.
    2. Raquel Carrasco & Javier Ruiz-Castillo, 2014. "The Evolution Of The Scientific Productivity Of Highly Productive Economists," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 52(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Stijn Kelchtermans & Reinhilde Veugelers, 2011. "The great divide in scientific productivity: why the average scientist does not exist," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 295-336, February.
    4. Kelchtermans, Stijn & Veugelers, Reinhilde, 2005. "Top Research Productivity and its Persistence," CEPR Discussion Papers 5415, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. RosalindS. Hunter & Andrew J. Oswald & Bruce G. Charlton, 2009. "The Elite Brain Drain," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(538), pages 231-251, June.
    6. Pierre-Philippe Combes & Laurent Linnemer, 2003. "Where are the Economists Who Publish? Publication Concentration and Rankings in Europe Based on Cumulative Publications," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 1(6), pages 1250-1308, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cte:werepe:we1415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ana Poveda). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.