IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crb/wpaper/2025-05.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Most-concerning derelict objects in LEO Insights from social choice

Author

Listed:
  • Marc Deschamps

    (Université Marie et Louis Pasteur, CRESE, UR3190, F-25000 Besançon, France)

  • Annick Laruelle

    (Department of economic analysis (ANEKO), University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), E-48015 Bilbao, Spain)

  • June Silva

    (Department of economic analysis (ANEKO), University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), E-48015 Bilbao, Spain)

Abstract

Eleven teams of experts were solicitated to provide a ranked list of the 50 statistically-most-concerning objects in LEO. The approaches used by the experts and resulting lists are described in McKnight et al.(2021). An aggregation rule that leads to a collective list is also proposed. This paper offers a view from social choice theory on the aggregation process. We show that different aggregation rules may yield different conclusions concerning the most concerning object. We also discuss alternative aggregation rules, and provide some recommandations concerning the question that could be addressed to experts.

Suggested Citation

  • Marc Deschamps & Annick Laruelle & June Silva, 2025. "Most-concerning derelict objects in LEO Insights from social choice," Working Papers 2025-05, CRESE.
    • Handle: RePEc:crb:wpaper:2025-05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://crese.univ-fcomte.fr/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/WP-2025-05.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2025
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crb:wpaper:2025-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Laurent Kondratuk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crufcfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.