IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/1628.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quantifying a Dangerous Obsession? Competitiveness and export performance in an OECD Panel of Industries

Author

Listed:
  • Carlin, Wendy
  • Glyn, Andrew J
  • Van Reenen, John

Abstract

This paper analyses the impact of cost competitiveness and technology on export performance using a very rich panel dataset of 12 manufacturing industries in 14 OECD countries for the period between 1970 and 1992. Consistent with standard models, we find that changes in relative unit labour costs are a robust determinant of changes in export market shares. In the long run a 10% increase in relative unit labour costs leads to a fall of between 2% and 3% of export market share. Despite this, the trends in national export performance cannot be fully explained by relative costs. This points to the importance of non-price factors, and extending the model to allow for technology effects (including R&D and patents) on quality provides some evidence for the importance of higher relative investment rates. Allowing for heterogeneity in the effect of relative costs in different industries, different countries and different time periods suggests that labour cost changes are less important in high technology industries, in periods of high demand and in countries within the European Monetary System.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlin, Wendy & Glyn, Andrew J & Van Reenen, John, 1997. "Quantifying a Dangerous Obsession? Competitiveness and export performance in an OECD Panel of Industries," CEPR Discussion Papers 1628, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:1628
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=1628
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Darby, Julia & Ireland, Jonathan & Leith, Campbell & Wren-Lewis, Simon, 1998. "COMPACT: a rational expectations, intertemporal model of the United Kingdom economy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1-52, January.
    2. Matthieu Crozet & Hélène Erkel‐Rousse, 2004. "Trade Performances, Product Quality Perceptions, and the Estimation of Trade Price Elasticities," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), pages 108-129, February.
    3. Wagner, Karin, 1998. "The German apprenticeship system after unification," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economic Change and Employment FS I 98-301, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Competitiveness; Exports; Panel Data;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F1 - International Economics - - Trade
    • J3 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:1628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.