IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000383/018142.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impactos del programa Ser Pilo Paga en los precios de matrícula de una muestra de universidades acreditadas en Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Hoyos-Pontón
  • Alexander Villarraga-Orjuela

Abstract

A finales de 2014 el Gobierno de Colombia introduce el programa de subsidio a la educación superior Ser Pilo Paga como una estrategia de fortalecimiento del acceso para estudiantes con alto rendimiento académico en condición de vulnerabilidad socioeconómica. A la fecha, la mayoría de las investigaciones revisadas en torno a este programa se han concentrado en asuntos de cobertura, asignación, desempeno académico y alcance educativo. Con ayuda de datos de precios de matrícula reconstruidos con registros documentales pecuniarios y técnicas paramétricas, y mediante una metodología de diferencias en diferencias, se aproxima su impacto en precios en una muestra de 14 instituciones acreditadas en alta calidad de un total de 65 durante el periodo de 2015 a 2018. Los resultados aportan evidencia a favor de que Ser Pilo Paga aumentó los precios de matrículas de las universidades participantes en una media del 2,3 al 4,3 % pp.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Hoyos-Pontón & Alexander Villarraga-Orjuela, 2020. "Impactos del programa Ser Pilo Paga en los precios de matrícula de una muestra de universidades acreditadas en Colombia," Documentos Departamento de Economía 18142, Universidad del Norte.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000383:018142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.uninorte.edu.co/documents/16008436/0/Docs+38.pdf/659d3829-426e-d96f-c405-8e6aa9312c82?t=1654202164024
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuexing Lan & John V Winters, 2011. "Did the D.C. Tuition Assistance Grant Program Cause Out-of-State Tuition to Increase?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 31(3), pages 2444-2453.
    2. Frederick, Allison B. & Schmidt, Stephen J. & Davis, Lewis S., 2012. "Federal policies, state responses, and community college outcomes: Testing an augmented Bennett hypothesis," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 908-917.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dennis A. Kramer & Justin C. Ortagus & T. Austin Lacy, 2018. "Tuition-Setting Authority and Broad-Based Merit Aid: The Effect of Policy Intersection on Pricing Strategies," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 59(4), pages 489-518, June.
    2. Grey Gordon & Aaron Hedlund, 2017. "Accounting for the Rise in College Tuition," NBER Chapters, in: Education, Skills, and Technical Change: Implications for Future US GDP Growth, pages 357-394, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Aaron Hedlund & Grey Gordon, 2017. "Accounting for Tuition Increases at U.S. Colleges," 2017 Meeting Papers 1550, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    4. Alla Fridman & Alexey Verbetsky, 2017. "Universities' competition under dual tuition system," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(3), pages 2122-2132.
    5. Kolpin, Van & Stater, Mark, 2024. "The perverse equilibrium effects of state and federal student aid in higher education," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 679-691.
    6. Fridman, A. & Verbetskaia, M., 2020. "Government regulation of the market for higher education," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 45(1), pages 12-43.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000383:018142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Departamento de Economía UN (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/denorco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.