IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cir/cirwor/2026s-09.html

Tourism Eco-Efficiency Through a Modular Lens

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Teigeiro
  • Sophie Bernard
  • Jean-Marc Frayret

Abstract

The inherent complexity of the tourism industry has led to the emergence of numerous ecolabels or environmental calculators, which frequently suffer from a lack of rigour, transparency, and standardisation, thereby hindering the clear identification of more sustainable offerings. To address these challenges, this study proposes a four-step systematic method for applying a modular multidimensional framework to assess eco-efficiency in tourism systems. By decomposing the complexity of tourism systems into distinct modular components, the framework facilitates a systematic evaluation and flexible configuration with standardised eco-efficiency factors. The framework’s versatility is demonstrated through two application perspectives, namely, an outfitter as a hospitality service provider and a tour operator, illustrating how modularity enables the development of flexible eco-efficient scenarios across different levels of the tourism value chain. Using the case of halieutic tourism, the findings suggest that outfitter hospitality services transitioning to renewable energy can support a reduction in their environmental impact. However, they should account for potential shifts in impact and consider demand reduction strategies. From the tour operator’s perspective, transportation is the predominant source of impacts in tourism packages. While extending the duration of trips decreases impacts on a per-day basis, it increases overall impacts; thus, assessments should also consider annual travel patterns at the individual level and occupation rates of services consumed. This modular approach holds potential to improve the reliability of tourism calculators or ecolabels by fostering standardization alongside adaptability, providing a robust tool for transparent and effective sustainability certification or other means. La complexité inhérente à l’industrie du tourisme a conduit à l’émergence de nombreux écolabels ou calculateurs environnementaux, qui souffrent fréquemment d’un manque de rigueur, de transparence et de standardisation, rendant difficile l’identification claire des offres les plus durables. Pour répondre à ces défis, cette étude propose une méthode systématique en quatre étapes permettant d’appliquer un cadre modulaire multidimensionnel afin d’évaluer l’éco-efficacité des systèmes touristiques. En décomposant la complexité des systèmes touristiques en composantes modulaires distinctes, ce cadre facilite une évaluation systématique ainsi qu’une configuration flexible reposant sur des facteurs d’éco-efficacité standardisés. La polyvalence du cadre est démontrée à travers deux perspectives d’application : celle d’un pourvoyeur en tant que prestataire de services d’hébergement, et celle d’un voyagiste. Cela illustre la manière dont la modularité permet de développer des scénarios éco-efficients flexibles à différents niveaux de la chaîne de valeur touristique. En prenant le cas du tourisme halieutique, les résultats suggèrent que les services d’hébergement des pourvoyeurs qui adoptent les énergies renouvelables peuvent contribuer à réduire leur impact environnemental. Toutefois, ils doivent tenir compte des possibles transferts d’impact et envisager des stratégies de réduction de la demande. Du point de vue du voyagiste, le transport constitue la principale source d’impacts dans les forfaits touristiques. Bien qu’un allongement de la durée des séjours réduise les impacts rapportés à la journée, il augmente les impacts globaux ; les évaluations devraient donc également prendre en compte les habitudes annuelles de déplacement à l’échelle individuelle ainsi que les taux d’occupation des services consommés. Cette approche modulaire présente un potentiel pour améliorer la fiabilité des calculateurs touristiques ou des écolabels en favorisant à la fois la standardisation et l’adaptabilité, offrant ainsi un outil robuste pour une certification durable transparente et efficace, ou pour d’autres dispositifs similaires.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Teigeiro & Sophie Bernard & Jean-Marc Frayret, 2026. "Tourism Eco-Efficiency Through a Modular Lens," CIRANO Working Papers 2026s-09, CIRANO.
  • Handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:2026s-09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/2026s-09.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard N. Langlois, 2002. "Modularity in Technology and Organization," Chapters, in: Nicolai J. Foss & Peter G. Klein (ed.), Entrepreneurship and the Firm, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anne Casati & Corine Genet, 2014. "Principal investigators as scientific entrepreneurs," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 11-32, February.
    2. Yi-Ling Cheng & Juin-Jen Chang, 2017. "The Quality of Intermediate Goods: Growth and Welfare Implications," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 93(302), pages 434-447, September.
    3. Srivardhini K. Jha & E. Richard Gold & Laurette Dubé, 2021. "Modular Interorganizational Network Governance: A Conceptual Framework for Addressing Complex Social Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Fixson, Sebastian K. & Park, Jin-Kyu, 2007. "The Power of Integrality: Linkages between Product Architecture, Innovation, and Industry Structure," Working papers 37154, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    5. Davide Consoli & Pier Paolo Patrucco, 2011. "Complexity and the Coordination of Technological Knowledge: The Case of Innovation Platforms," Chapters, in: Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change, chapter 8 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Giovanna Devetag & Enrico Zaninotto, 2001. "The imperfect hiding: Some introductory concepts and preliminary issues on modularity," ROCK Working Papers 010, Department of Computer and Management Sciences, University of Trento, Italy, revised 13 Jun 2008.
    7. Félicia Saïah & Diego Vega & Harwin de Vries & Joakim Kembro, 2023. "Process modularity, supply chain responsiveness, and moderators: The Médecins Sans Frontières response to the Covid‐19 pandemic," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(5), pages 1490-1511, May.
    8. Hüseyin Tanriverdi & Prabhudev Konana & Ling Ge, 2007. "The Choice of Sourcing Mechanisms for Business Processes," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 280-299, September.
    9. Vincent FRIGANT & Stéphanie PERES & Stéphane VIROL, 2012. "How do SMEs to rise at the top of the supply chain? An econometric exploration of the French auto industry (In French)," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2012-16, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    10. repec:vnm:wpdman:77 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Hannes Rothe & Katharina Barbara Lauer & Callum Talbot-Cooper & Daniel Juan Sivizaca Conde, 2023. "Digital entrepreneurship from cellular data: How omics afford the emergence of a new wave of digital ventures in health," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Mazzanti, Massimiliano & Mancinelli, Susanna, 2007. "SME Performance, Innovation and Networking Evidence on Complementarities for a Local Economic System," Knowledge, Technology, Human Capital Working Papers 9554, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    13. Fixson, Sebastian K. & Park, Jin-Kyu, 2008. "The power of integrality: Linkages between product architecture, innovation, and industry structure," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 1296-1316, September.
    14. Langlois, Richard, 2024. "Memes and Myths of Antitrust," Working Papers 12772, George Mason University, Mercatus Center.
    15. Alessandro Rossi & Alessandro Narduzzo, 2003. "Modular design and the development of complex artifact lesson fron free open source software," Quaderni DISA 080, Department of Computer and Management Sciences, University of Trento, Italy, revised 29 Sep 2003.
    16. Lynne Kiesling, 2021. "Plug-and-play, mix-and-match: a capital systems theory of digital technology platforms," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 34(1), pages 13-32, March.
    17. Youngjin Yoo & Ola Henfridsson & Jannis Kallinikos & Robert Gregory & Gordon Burtch & Sutirtha Chatterjee & Suprateek Sarker, 2024. "The Next Frontiers of Digital Innovation Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 1507-1523, December.
    18. Marta Gancarczyk & Jacek Gancarczyk & Joanna Bohatkiewicz, 2017. "SME Roles in Modular Value Chains: Perspectives for Growth and Innovativeness," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 5(3), pages 95-117.
    19. Wolfgang Kerber & Simonetta Vezzoso, 2004. "EU Competition Policy, Vertical Restraints, and Innovation: An Analysis from an Evolutionary Perspective," Marburg Working Papers on Economics 200414, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    20. Flavio Calvino & Luca Fontanelli, 2026. "Decoding AI: an early look at how French firms use AI," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 16(1), pages 51-93, March.
    21. Stefano Elia & Rajneesh Narula & Silvia Massini, 2015. "Disentangling the Role of Modularity and Bandwidth in Entry Mode Choice: The Case of Business Services Offshoring," John H Dunning Centre for International Business Discussion Papers jhd-dp2015-06, Henley Business School, University of Reading.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:2026s-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciranca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.