IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

A microeconometric analysis of smoking in the UK health and lifestyle survey

Listed author(s):
  • Andrew M Jones

This paper provides an overview of microeconometric evidence on various aspects of smoking using data from the UK Health and Lifestyle Survey (HALS). In doing so it illustrates how the choice of an appropriate statistical model is influenced by the survey design and the definition and measurement of variables. The HALS is a rich source of information on cigarette smoking which provides data on all aspects of the “life-cycle” of a smoker. Results are reported for parametric survival analysis of the age of starting and the number of years of smoking; univariate and bivariate probit models suggest that addiction, proxied by previous peak consumption, does not affect the desire to quit but does lead to a significant reduction in the chance of succeeding. There is clear socio-economic gradient in success in quitting, but not in the desire to quit. Those with other smokers in the household are less likely top have quit. Results for the duration analysis suggest that the determinants of the number of years smoked are broadly similar for those for quitting. The results for the Box-Cox double hurdle model are consistent with a “fixed cost” model of addiction. Addiction reduces the probability of quitting and raises the number of cigarettes smoked. However, the effects of other variables work in opposing directions for participation and consumption. The implication is that, after controlling for addiction, the more someone smokes the more likely they are to try and quit, as the potential benefits of quitting are greater.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: First version, 1995
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Centre for Health Economics, University of York in its series Working Papers with number 139chedp.

in new window

Length: 44 pages
Date of creation: Sep 1995
Handle: RePEc:chy:respap:139chedp
Contact details of provider: Postal:
York Y010 5DD

Phone: (01904) 321401
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Tony J Culyer, 1994. "Funding research in the NHS," Working Papers 125chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
  2. Tony J Culyer & Adam Wagstaff, 1992. "Need, equity and equality in health and health care," Working Papers 095chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
  3. Karen Bloor & Alam Maynard & Andrew Street, 1992. "How much is a doctor worth?," Working Papers 098chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
  4. Tony Culyer, 1991. "Health, health expenditures and equity," Working Papers 083chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
  5. Tony J Culyer, 1990. "The internal market: an acceptable means to a desirable end," Working Papers 067chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
  6. Tony J Culyer & Alan Wagstaff, 1991. "Need, equality and social justice," Working Papers 090chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
  7. Tony J Culyer & Adam Wagstaff, 1992. "QALYs versus HYEs - a theoretical exposition," Working Papers 099chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chy:respap:139chedp. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Frances Sharp)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.