IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cem/doctra/911.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Entendiendo mejor los rankings globales de universidades

Author

Listed:
  • Gustavo Ferro
  • Juan Dip

Abstract

Se utilizan modelos avanzados de análisis de eficiencia para decodificar los pesos implícitos de los tres índices compuestos globales que rankean universidades: Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU), Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) y Times Higher Education (THE), tras una discusión de la literatura sobre los rankings de universidades, sus aportes y sus problemas. La metodología central empleada por Ferro & Dip (2025), cuyos resultados se reseñan aquí, se basa en los modelos Benefit-of-the-Doubt (BoD), que, a su vez, derivan del Análisis Envolvente de Datos (DEA). Las principales contribuciones analíticas del estudio giran en torno a la aplicación de metodologías avanzadas de eficiencia para decodificar las estructuras de peso implícitas en los rankings (ARWU, QS y THE) y generar diagnósticos detallados y útiles para la mejora institucional. El análisis revela discrepancias entre los pesos oficiales asignados por las agencias de ranking y los pesos derivados de los modelos BoD (pesos implícitos de importancia).

Suggested Citation

  • Gustavo Ferro & Juan Dip, 2025. "Entendiendo mejor los rankings globales de universidades," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 911, Universidad del CEMA.
  • Handle: RePEc:cem:doctra:911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ucema.edu.ar/sites/default/files/2025-11/dt911.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cem:doctra:911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucila Solla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cemaaar.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.