IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cea/doctra/e2005_21.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A bargaining model for finite n-person multi-criteria games

Author

Listed:

Abstract

In this paper we consider a multi-criteria game model which allows interactions between players. The problem addressed is considered as a cooperative game in order to achieve consensus solutions which are evaluated with respect to several criteria simultaneously. The main idea consists of analyzing finite multi-criteria n-person games as multi-criteria bargaining games. The notion of Pareto-optimal guaranteed payoffs as a generalization of the maximin values of scalar games is proposed, together with two different solution concepts which can be characterized as the solutions of multi-criteria linear programming problems. A procedure to incorporate additional information about the agents' preferences in order to reach a final consensus is also provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Luisa Monroy & Amparo M. Mármol & Victoriana Rubiales, 2005. "A bargaining model for finite n-person multi-criteria games," Economic Working Papers at Centro de Estudios Andaluces E2005/21, Centro de Estudios Andaluces.
    • Handle: RePEc:cea:doctra:e2005_21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://public.centrodeestudiosandaluces.es/pdfs/E200521.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paolo Cubiotti, 2000. "Existence Of Generalised Pareto Equilibria For Constrained Multiobjective Games," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 2(04), pages 329-344.
    2. Kalai, Ehud & Smorodinsky, Meir, 1975. "Other Solutions to Nash's Bargaining Problem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 43(3), pages 513-518, May.
    3. Borm, Peter & Vermeulen, Dries & Voorneveld, Mark, 2003. "The structure of the set of equilibria for two person multicriteria games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(3), pages 480-493, August.
    4. M. Voorneveld, 1999. "Pareto-Optimal Security Strategies as Minimax Strategies of a Standard Matrix Game," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 203-210, July.
    5. Zhao, Jingang, 1991. "The Equilibria of a Multiple Object Game," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 20(2), pages 171-182.
    6. E. Allevi & A. Gnudi & I.V. Konnov & S. Schaible, 2003. "Noncooperative Games with Vector Payoffs Under Relative Pseudomonotonicity," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 118(2), pages 245-254, August.
    7. S. X. Li, 1998. "Cone Concavity and Multiple-Payoff Constrained n-Person Games," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 97(1), pages 119-149, April.
    8. ZHAO, Jingang, 1991. "The equilibria of a multiple objective game," LIDAM Reprints CORE 987, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. I. Nishizaki & T. Notsu, 2007. "Nondominated Equilibrium Solutions of a Multiobjective Two-Person Nonzero-Sum Game and Corresponding Mathematical Programming Problem," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 217-239, November.
    2. Yasuo Sasaki, 2019. "Rationalizability in multicriteria games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 48(2), pages 673-685, June.
    3. A. Zapata & A. M. Mármol & L. Monroy & M. A. Caraballo, 2019. "A Maxmin Approach for the Equilibria of Vector-Valued Games," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 415-432, April.
    4. Karima Fahem & Mohammed Radjef, 2015. "Properly efficient Nash equilibrium in multicriteria noncooperative games," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 82(2), pages 175-193, October.
    5. Eric Howe & Jingang Zhao, 2004. "Merger Incentives and Inverse Matrices from Bertrand Competition," Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings 586, Econometric Society.
    6. M. Quant & P. Borm & G. Fiestras-Janeiro & F. Megen, 2009. "On Properness and Protectiveness in Two-Person Multicriteria Games," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 499-512, March.
    7. Marek Hudik, 0. "Equilibrium as compatibility of plans," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    8. Juho Kokkala & Kimmo Berg & Kai Virtanen & Jirka Poropudas, 2019. "Rationalizable strategies in games with incomplete preferences," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 86(2), pages 185-204, March.
    9. Aymeric Lardon, 2020. "Convexity of Bertrand oligopoly TU-games with differentiated products," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(1), pages 285-302, April.
    10. Takayuki Watanabe & Nobuo Matsubayashi, 2013. "Note on Stable Mergers in a Market with Asymmetric Substitutability," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 33(3), pages 2024-2033.
    11. Aymeric Lardon, 2019. "On the coalitional stability of monopoly power in differentiated Bertrand and Cournot oligopolies," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 87(4), pages 421-449, November.
    12. Marek Hudik, 2020. "Equilibrium as compatibility of plans," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 89(3), pages 349-368, October.
    13. Zhao, Jingang, 2018. "Three little-known and yet still significant contributions of Lloyd Shapley," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 592-599.
    14. Raul P. Lejano & Helen Ingram, 2012. "Modeling the commons as a game with vector payoffs," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 24(1), pages 66-89, January.
    15. H. Yu & H. M. Liu, 2013. "Robust Multiple Objective Game Theory," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 272-280, October.
    16. J. Puerto & F.R. Fernández, 1998. "Pareto‐optimality in classical inventory problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(1), pages 83-98, February.
    17. Andreas H. Hamel & Andreas Löhne, 2018. "A set optimization approach to zero-sum matrix games with multi-dimensional payoffs," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 88(3), pages 369-397, December.
    18. Takeda, Kohei & Hosoe, Toyoki & Watanabe, Takayuki & Matsubayashi, Nobuo, 2018. "Stability analysis of horizontal mergers in a market with asymmetric substitutability," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 73-84.
    19. Sasaki, Yasuo, 2022. "Unawareness of decision criteria in multicriteria games," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 31-40.
    20. Kokkala, Juho & Poropudas, Jirka & Virtanen, Kai, 2015. "Rationalizable Strategies in Games With Incomplete Preferences," MPRA Paper 68331, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Finite multi-criteria games. Bargaining games. Multi-criteria analysis;

    JEL classification:

    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • C78 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cea:doctra:e2005_21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Susana Mérida (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fcanges.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.