IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt3fh194sj.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Enhancements of ATMIS Using Artificial Intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Henry X.
  • Recker, Will

Abstract

PARAMICS is one of the widely used microscopic traffic simulation program. One important feature of PARAMICSis that PARAMICS allows the user to customize many features of underlying simulation model through a Functional Interface or Application Programming Interface (API). We have developed a library of plug-in modules to enhance the capabilities of PARAMICS simulation through API. These API modules include actuated signal control, time-based ramp meter control, path-based routing, loop data aggregator, performance measures, MYSQL database connection, and network communication through CORBA, etc. With these functionality enhancements, PARAMICS simulation could be customizedto test and evaluate various ITS applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Henry X. & Recker, Will, 2002. "Enhancements of ATMIS Using Artificial Intelligence," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3fh194sj, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt3fh194sj
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/3fh194sj.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pitu Mirchandani & Hossein Soroush, 1987. "Generalized Traffic Equilibrium with Probabilistic Travel Times and Perceptions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 133-152, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valentina Morandi, 2024. "Bridging the user equilibrium and the system optimum in static traffic assignment: a review," 4OR, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 89-119, March.
    2. Xu, Xiangdong & Qu, Kai & Chen, Anthony & Yang, Chao, 2021. "A new day-to-day dynamic network vulnerability analysis approach with Weibit-based route adjustment process," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    3. E. Nikolova & N. E. Stier-Moses, 2014. "A Mean-Risk Model for the Traffic Assignment Problem with Stochastic Travel Times," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 366-382, April.
    4. David Watling, 2002. "A Second Order Stochastic Network Equilibrium Model, II: Solution Method and Numerical Experiments," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 167-183, May.
    5. Zhi-Chun Li & William Lam & S. Wong & Hai-Jun Huang & Dao-Li Zhu, 2008. "Reliability Evaluation for Stochastic and Time-dependent Networks with Multiple Parking Facilities," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 355-381, December.
    6. Michael W. Levin & Melissa Duell & S. Travis Waller, 2020. "Arrival Time Reliability in Strategic User Equilibrium," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 803-831, September.
    7. Liu, Yong & Xiao, Feng & Shen, Minyu & Zhao, Lin & Li, Lu, 2024. "The k-th order mean-deviation model for route choice under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    8. Xiangfeng Ji & Xiaoyu Ao, 2021. "Travelers’ Bi-Attribute Decision Making on the Risky Mode Choice with Flow-Dependent Salience Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, April.
    9. Wang, Judith Y.T. & Ehrgott, Matthias & Chen, Anthony, 2014. "A bi-objective user equilibrium model of travel time reliability in a road network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 4-15.
    10. Small, K. & Noland, R. & Koskenoja, P., 1995. "Socio-economic Attributes And Impacts Of Travel Reliability: A Stated Preference Approach," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt82n2w53k, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    11. Henn, Vincent & Ottomanelli, Michele, 2006. "Handling uncertainty in route choice models: From probabilistic to possibilistic approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(3), pages 1526-1538, December.
    12. Zhang, Yu & Tang, Jiafu, 2018. "Itinerary planning with time budget for risk-averse travelers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 288-303.
    13. Kitthamkesorn, Songyot & Chen, Anthony, 2013. "A path-size weibit stochastic user equilibrium model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 378-397.
    14. Kitthamkesorn, Songyot & Chen, Anthony, 2017. "Alternate weibit-based model for assessing green transport systems with combined mode and route travel choices," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 291-310.
    15. Qi, Jin & Sim, Melvyn & Sun, Defeng & Yuan, Xiaoming, 2016. "Preferences for travel time under risk and ambiguity: Implications in path selection and network equilibrium," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 264-284.
    16. Amirgholy, Mahyar & Gonzales, Eric J., 2017. "Efficient frontier of route choice for modeling the equilibrium under travel time variability with heterogeneous traveler preferences," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 11, pages 1-14.
    17. Tae-Hyoung Tommy Gim & Joonho Ko, 2017. "Maximum Likelihood and Firth Logistic Regression of the Pedestrian Route Choice," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 40(6), pages 616-637, November.
    18. Xie, Chi & Liu, Zugang, 2014. "On the stochastic network equilibrium with heterogeneous choice inertia," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 90-109.
    19. Einat Tenenboim & Nira Munichor & Yoram Shiftan, 2023. "Justifying toll payment with biased travel time estimates: Behavioral findings and route choice modeling," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 477-511, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt3fh194sj. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.