IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/globco/qt2fc2d3pr.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Zombies Ahead: Explaining the Rise of Low-Quality Election Monitoring

Author

Listed:
  • Sunn Bush, Sarah
  • Cottiero, Christina
  • Prather, Lauren

Abstract

The international election monitoring regime has become considerably more complex in the 21st century. Although the number of organizations engaged in high-quality election monitoring has plateaued, the number of low-quality monitors—commonly known as zombie monitors—hascontinued to grow. Low-quality election monitors threaten democracy because they validate flawed elections and undermine the legitimacy of the international election monitoring regime. This article argues that international politics have played a crucial role in the diffusion of low-quality electionmonitors. It hypothesizes that ties with autocratic powers that promote low-quality observers and membership in authoritarian regional organizations significantly increase the likelihood that a country will host low-quality monitors at its elections. To test the hypotheses, the article draws on original data on international election observation between 2000 and 2020 that identifies the most comprehensive set of groups of election monitors to date. A statistical analysis of the dataset supports the argument.

Suggested Citation

  • Sunn Bush, Sarah & Cottiero, Christina & Prather, Lauren, 2024. "Zombies Ahead: Explaining the Rise of Low-Quality Election Monitoring," Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series qt2fc2d3pr, Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:globco:qt2fc2d3pr
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/2fc2d3pr.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pratt, Tyler, 2018. "Deference and Hierarchy in International Regime Complexes," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 72(3), pages 561-590, July.
    2. Fritz Nganje & Kgalalelo Nganje, 2019. "Liberal internationalism meets third worldism: the politics of international election observation in the DRC’s post-war elections," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 521-541, March.
    3. Kelley, Judith, 2009. "D-Minus Elections: The Politics and Norms of International Election Observation," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 63(4), pages 765-787, October.
    4. Hyde, Susan D. & Marinov, Nikolay, 2012. "Which Elections Can Be Lost?," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 191-210, April.
    5. Brancati, Dawn, 2014. "Building Confidence in Elections: The Case of Electoral Monitors in Kosova," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 6-15, April.
    6. Beaulieu,Emily, 2014. "Electoral Protest and Democracy in the Developing World," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107039681, Enero-Abr.
    7. Beaulieu,Emily, 2014. "Electoral Protest and Democracy in the Developing World," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107612273, Enero-Abr.
    8. Robertson, Graeme, 2017. "Political Orientation, Information and Perceptions of Election Fraud: Evidence from Russia," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(3), pages 589-608, July.
    9. Maria J. Debre, 2022. "Clubs of autocrats: Regional organizations and authoritarian survival," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 485-511, July.
    10. Marianne Kneuer & Thomas Demmelhuber & Raphael Peresson & Tobias Zumbrägel, 2019. "Playing the regional card: why and how authoritarian gravity centres exploit regional organisations," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 451-470, March.
    11. Hyde, Susan D. & Marinov, Nikolay, 2014. "Information and Self-Enforcing Democracy: The Role of International Election Observation," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 68(2), pages 329-359, April.
    12. Pratt, Tyler, 2018. "Deference and Hierarchy in International Regime Complexes—ERRATUM," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 72(3), pages 761-762, July.
    13. Leifeld, Philip, 2013. "texreg: Conversion of Statistical Model Output in R to LATEX and HTML Tables," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 55(i08).
    14. Farrell, Henry & Newman, Abraham L., 2021. "The Janus Face of the Liberal International Information Order: When Global Institutions Are Self-Undermining," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 75(2), pages 333-358, February.
    15. Chaudhry, Suparna, 2022. "The Assault on Civil Society: Explaining State Crackdown on NGOs," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 76(3), pages 549-590, March.
    16. Zeileis, Achim, 2004. "Econometric Computing with HC and HAC Covariance Matrix Estimators," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 11(i10).
    17. Gandhi,Jennifer, 2008. "Political Institutions under Dictatorship," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521897952, Enero-Abr.
    18. Bush, Sarah Sunn & Prather, Lauren, 2018. "Who's There? Election Observer Identity and the Local Credibility of Elections," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 72(3), pages 659-692, July.
    19. Adler, Emanuel & Drieschova, Alena, 2021. "The Epistemological Challenge of Truth Subversion to the Liberal International Order," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 75(2), pages 359-386, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Morrison, Kelly & Savun, Burcu & Donno, Daniela & Davutoglu, Perisa, 2023. "Competing Verdicts: Multiple Election Monitors and Post-Election Contention," Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series qt3kc4f57j, Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California.
    2. Dawn Brancati & Adrián Lucardi, 2019. "Why Democracy Protests Do Not Diffuse," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(10), pages 2354-2389, November.
    3. Hanne Fjelde, 2020. "Political party strength and electoral violence," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(1), pages 140-155, January.
    4. Cazals, Antoine & Léon, Florian, 2023. "Perception of political instability in election periods: Evidence from African firms," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 259-276.
    5. Cottiero, Christina & Haggard, Stephan, 2022. "Stabilizing Authoritarian Rule: The Role of International Organizations," Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series qt5mk6g1z0, Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California.
    6. Erin Baggott Carter & Brett L. Carter, 2021. "Propaganda and Protest in Autocracies," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 65(5), pages 919-949, May.
    7. Escriba-Folch, Abel & Meseguer, Covadonga & Wright, Joseph, 2018. "Remittances and protest in dictatorships," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 89058, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Hannah Smidt, 2021. "Keeping electoral peace? Activities of United Nations peacekeeping operations and their effects on election-related violence," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 38(5), pages 580-604, September.
    9. Hanne Fjelde & Kristine Höglund, 2022. "Introducing the Deadly Electoral Conflict Dataset (DECO)," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 66(1), pages 162-185, January.
    10. Gail Buttorff & Douglas Dion, 2017. "Participation and boycott in authoritarian elections," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 29(1), pages 97-123, January.
    11. Cottiero, Christina & Hafner-Burton, Emily & Haggard, Stephan & Prather, Lauren & Schneider, Christina J, 2024. "Illiberal Regimes and International Organizations," Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series qt2bx6b98g, Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California.
    12. Merl, Robert & Stöckl, Thomas & Palan, Stefan, 2023. "Insider trading regulation and shorting constraints. Evaluating the joint effects of two market interventions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    13. Jho, Whasun & Kim, Youngwan, 2022. "Regime complexity and state competition over Global Internet Governance," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(2).
    14. Jäger, Kai, 2016. "The Role of Regime Type in the Political Economy of Foreign Reserve Accumulation," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 79-96.
    15. Faude, Benjamin, 2020. "International institutions in hard times: how institutional complexity increases resilience," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108663, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Fuß, Julia & Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian & Saravia, Andrés & Zürn, Michael, 2021. "Managing regime complexity: Introducing the interface conflicts 1.0 dataset," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2021-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    17. Mette Eilstrup-Sangiovanni & Oliver Westerwinter, 2022. "The global governance complexity cube: Varieties of institutional complexity in global governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 233-262, April.
    18. Daniel L. Nielson & Susan D. Hyde & Judith Kelley, 2019. "The elusive sources of legitimacy beliefs: Civil society views of international election observers," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 685-715, December.
    19. Andrew T Little, 2017. "Are non-competitive elections good for citizens?," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 29(2), pages 214-242, April.
    20. Aidt, T. S. & Leon-Ablan, G., 2025. "Can Democratic Reforms Promote Political Activism? Evidence from the Great Reform Act of 1832," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2545, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:globco:qt2fc2d3pr. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://escholarship.org/uc/igcc/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.