IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/revint/v20y2025i2d10.1007_s11558-024-09554-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Zombies ahead: Explaining the rise of low-quality election monitoring

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Sunn Bush

    (University of Pennsylvania)

  • Christina Cottiero

    (University of Utah)

  • Lauren Prather

    (University of California)

Abstract

The international election monitoring regime has become considerably more complex in the twenty-first century. Although the number of organizations engaged in high-quality election monitoring has plateaued, the number of low-quality monitors—commonly known as zombie monitors—has continued to grow. Low-quality election monitors threaten democracy because they validate flawed elections and undermine the legitimacy of the international election monitoring regime. This article argues that international politics have played a crucial role in the diffusion of low-quality election monitors. It hypothesizes that ties with autocratic powers that promote low-quality observers and membership in authoritarian regional organizations significantly increase the likelihood that a country will host low-quality monitors at its elections. To test the hypotheses, the article draws on original data on international election observation between 2000 and 2020 that identifies the most comprehensive set of groups of election monitors to-date. A statistical analysis of the dataset supports the argument.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Sunn Bush & Christina Cottiero & Lauren Prather, 2025. "Zombies ahead: Explaining the rise of low-quality election monitoring," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 261-291, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:revint:v:20:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11558-024-09554-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11558-024-09554-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11558-024-09554-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11558-024-09554-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:revint:v:20:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11558-024-09554-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.