IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/cshedu/qt95g888hc.html

On "Putting Lipstick on A Pig": Beware "Moderate" Critiques of DEI Statements Dressed as Concern for Academic Freedom

Author

Listed:
  • Jayakumar , Uma

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Jayakumar , Uma, 2023. "On "Putting Lipstick on A Pig": Beware "Moderate" Critiques of DEI Statements Dressed as Concern for Academic Freedom," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt95g888hc, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:cshedu:qt95g888hc
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/95g888hc.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bas Hofstra & Vivek V. Kulkarni & Sebastian Munoz-Najar Galvez & Bryan He & Dan Jurafsky & Daniel A. McFarland, 2020. "The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(17), pages 9284-9291, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Lingfei & Kittur, Aniket & Youn, Hyejin & Milojević, Staša & Leahey, Erin & Fiore, Stephen M. & Ahn, Yong-Yeol, 2022. "Metrics and mechanisms: Measuring the unmeasurable in the science of science," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    2. Theodore C. Masters-Waage & Juan M. Madera & Ebenezer Edema-Sillo & Ally St. Aubin & Peggy Lindner & Maritza Gaytan & Heyao Yu & Christiane Spitzmueller, 2026. "Evaluating multiple candidates simultaneously reduces racial disparities in promotion and tenure," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 17(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Huidong Wu & Jianping Li & Dengsheng Wu, 2026. "Authenticity or self-advocacy? Identifying the credibility of positive words in scientific titles and abstracts," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 131(1), pages 209-234, January.
    4. Zhou, Sifan & Chai, Sen & Freeman, Richard B., 2024. "Gender homophily: In-group citation preferences and the gender disadvantage," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).
    5. Lin, Yiling & Evans, James A. & Wu, Lingfei, 2022. "New directions in science emerge from disconnection and discord," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    6. Wei Fu & Shin-Yi Chou & Li-San Wang, 2026. "NIH grant expansion, ancestral diversity, and scientific collaborations in genomics research," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 39(1), pages 1-42, March.
    7. Yang, Alex J., 2025. "Text vs. citations: A comparative analysis of breakthrough and disruption metrics in patent innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(8).
    8. Martín de Diego, Isaac & González-Fernández, César & Fernández-Isabel, Alberto & Fernández, Rubén R. & Cabezas, Javier, 2021. "System for evaluating the reliability and novelty of medical scientific papers," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(4).
    9. Anahit Mkrtchyan, & Sandvik, Jason & Xu, Da, 2024. "Employee responses to CEO activism," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(1).
    10. Akbaritabar, Aliakbar & Stephen, Dimity & Squazzoni, Flaminio, 2022. "A study of referencing changes in preprint-publication pairs across multiple fields," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    11. Amirali Karimi & Catherine Beaudry & Vincent Larivière, 2026. "Scientists on the move: The impact of collaboration with different mobility groups on the performance of Canadian scientists," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 1-63, April.
    12. Jochem Tolsma & Bas Hofstra & Anne Maaike Mulders, 2025. "Knowledge lost, parity gained? COVID-19 and gender gaps in Dutch academia," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(10), pages 5667-5694, October.
    13. Nicole A. Cooke & Vanessa L. Kitzie, 2021. "Outsiders‐within‐Library and Information Science: Reprioritizing the marginalized in critical sociocultural work," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(10), pages 1285-1294, October.
    14. Nørskov, Sladjana & Damholdt, Malene F. & Ulhøi, John P. & Jensen, Morten Berg & Mathiasen, Mia Krogager & Ess, Charles M. & Seibt, Johanna, 2022. "Employers’ and applicants’ fairness perceptions in job interviews: using a teleoperated robot as a fair proxy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    15. Kim, Lanu & Smith, Daniel Scott & Hofstra, Bas & McFarland, Daniel A., 2022. "Gendered knowledge in fields and academic careers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    16. Wang, Zhongyi & Zhang, Haoxuan & Chen, Jiangping & Chen, Haihua, 2024. "An effective framework for measuring the novelty of scientific articles through integrated topic modeling and cloud model," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4).
    17. Yang, Alex J., 2024. "Unveiling the impact and dual innovation of funded research," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1).
    18. Cao, Dongqin & Peng, Can & Yang, Guanglei & Zhang, Wei, 2022. "How does the pressure of political promotion affect renewable energy technological innovation? Evidence from 30 Chinese provinces," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    19. Jin, Qianqian & Chen, Hongshu & Wang, Xuefeng & Xiong, Fei, 2024. "How do network embeddedness and knowledge stock influence collaboration dynamics? Evidence from patents," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4).
    20. McGuire, Erin & Rietveld, Anne M. & Crump, Amanda & Leeuwis, Cees, 2022. "Anticipating gender impacts in scaling innovations for agriculture: Insights from the literature," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:cshedu:qt95g888hc. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://escholarship.org/uc/cshe/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.