Author
Listed:
- Caitlin Meyer
(Northeastern University)
- Du Baogui
(Northeastern University)
- Mohamed Amin Gouda
(Northeastern University)
Abstract
The underrepresentation of women in science, technology, and innovation policy (STIP) continues to hinder global innovation and scientific advancement. While research has examined women’s participation in STEM and policymaking separately, their intersection within STIP as a distinct sector remains understudied. This study addresses this gap by developing a comprehensive machine learning framework to accurately measure and predict women’s representation in STIP while accounting for missing domestic data. Using data from 60 countries, we implemented hybrid machine learning models—including Linear Regression, ElasticNet, Lasso Regression, and Ridge Regression, and Support Vector Regression—to forecast women’s representation in STIP. The methodology incorporated advanced techniques such as K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) imputation for missing data handling, feature engineering using autoencoders’ latent representations, and evaluation through multiple regression metrics. The SVR model achieved the highest predictive accuracy with an R2 score of 0.835, and mean cross validation score with standard deviation of 0.196 and the low error metrics (MAE: 0.2677; RMSE: 0.406), establishing the first reliable method for quantifying women’s representation in STIP as its own sector. Interestingly, countries without formal quota systems demonstrated superior performance metrics (median: 0.3675; mean: 0.3676) compared to those with quotas. Furthermore, the analysis revealed a critical disconnect between STEM participation rates and policymaking leadership roles, evidenced by a weak correlation (r = 0.11) between these domains. These findings challenge assumptions about the effectiveness of quota systems alone in driving gender equity and suggest that holistic approaches addressing systemic barriers are essential for sustainable progress. This study provides a novel analytical framework for evaluating gender representation in STIP while offering actionable insights into fostering gender equity across sectors. By delivering more accurate measurements of women’s representation in STIP, this research contributes significantly to evidence-based policymaking and establishes a foundation for future interdisciplinary studies on gender equity within this critical domain.
Suggested Citation
Caitlin Meyer & Du Baogui & Mohamed Amin Gouda, 2025.
"Applying machine learning to gauge the number of women in science, technology, and innovation policy (STIP): a model to accommodate missing data,"
Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
Handle:
RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05610-4
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05610-4
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05610-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.