IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bon/boncrc/crctr224_2025_703.html

Sequential Equilibria in Mixed Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Francesc Dilmé

Abstract

A Nash equilibrium of a game in extensive form is a sequential equilibrium in mixed strategies if it can be approximated through equilibria of close-by games with slightly perturbed payoffs and small-probability behavioral types. We show that sequential equilibria in mixed strategies are equivalent to (i) weakly sequential equilibria (Reny, 1992), (ii) normal-form perfect equilibria (Selten, 1975) in games with generic payoffs, and (iii) purifiable Nash equilibria (Harsanyi, 1973). A corollary of our results is that extensive-form perfect equilibria are normal-form perfect equilibria in games with generic payoffs.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesc Dilmé, 2025. "Sequential Equilibria in Mixed Strategies," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2025_703, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2025_703
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.crctr224.de/research/discussion-papers/archive/dp703
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Damme, E.E.C., 1984. "A relation between perfect equilibria in extensive form games and proper equilibria in normal form games," Other publications TiSEM 3734d89e-fd5c-4c80-a230-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hillas, John & Kvasov, Dmitriy, 2020. "Backward induction in games without perfect recall," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 207-218.
    2. Renault, Jérôme & Solan, Eilon & Vieille, Nicolas, 0. "Strategic experimentation with privately observed payoffs," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society.
    3. Carlos Pimienta & Jianfei Shen, 2014. "On the equivalence between (quasi-)perfect and sequential equilibria," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 43(2), pages 395-402, May.
    4. Yang, Chih-Chun, 2018. "Perfect forward induction," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 113-116.
    5. Michael Greinecker & Martin Meier & Konrad Podczeck, 2026. "Sequential Equilibria in a Class of Infinite Extensive Form Games," Papers 2604.25784, arXiv.org.
    6. Takahashi, Satoru & Tercieux, Olivier, 2020. "Robust equilibrium outcomes in sequential games under almost common certainty of payoffs," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    7. Milgrom, Paul & Mollner, Joshua, 2021. "Extended proper equilibrium," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    8. Demichelis, Stefano & Ritzberger, Klaus, 2003. "From evolutionary to strategic stability," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 51-75, November.
    9. Antoni Calvó-Armengol & Rahmi İlkılıç, 2009. "Pairwise-stability and Nash equilibria in network formation," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 38(1), pages 51-79, March.
    10. Francesco Caruso & Maria Carmela Ceparano & Jacqueline Morgan, 2024. "Asymptotic behavior of subgame perfect Nash equilibria in Stackelberg games," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 336(3), pages 1573-1590, May.
    11. Stefano Demichelis & Klaus Ritzberger & Jeroen M. Swinkels, 2004. "The simple geometry of perfect information games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 32(3), pages 315-338, June.
    12. Gatti, Nicola & Gilli, Mario & Marchesi, Alberto, 2020. "A characterization of quasi-perfect equilibria," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 240-255.
    13. V. K. Oikonomou & J. Jost, 2013. "Periodic Strategies: A New Solution Concept and an Algorithm for NonTrivial Strategic Form Games," Papers 1307.2035, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2018.
    14. Sam Ganzfried, 2022. "Observable Perfect Equilibrium," Papers 2210.16506, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    15. Yukio KORIYAMA & Matias Nunez, 2014. "Hybrid Procedures," Thema Working Papers 2014-02, THEMA (Théorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), CY Cergy-Paris University, ESSEC and CNRS.
    16. Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Klaus Ritzberger, 2020. "Reduced normal forms are not extensive forms," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 8(2), pages 281-288, October.
    17. Srihari Govindan & Robert Wilson, 2009. "On Forward Induction," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 77(1), pages 1-28, January.
    18. Joseph Y. Halpern & Yoram Moses, 2017. "Characterizing solution concepts in terms of common knowledge of rationality," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(2), pages 457-473, May.
    19. Francesc Dilmé, 2025. "Sequential Equilibria in Mixed Strategies," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 373, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    20. V. K. Oikonomou & J. Jost, 2020. "Periodic Strategies II: Generalizations and Extensions," Papers 2005.12832, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • C73 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2025_703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CRC Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.crctr224.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.