Author
Listed:
- Anna Burova
(Bank of Russia, Russian Federation)
- Kristina Virovets
(Bank of Russia, Russian Federation)
- Denis Koshelev
(Bank of Russia, Russian Federation)
- Ekaterina Petreneva
(Bank of Russia, Russian Federation)
- Alexey Ponomarenko
(Bank of Russia, Russian Federation)
Abstract
The analysis of banks referred to as community banks in the international literature is a widespread application problem within the scope of regulators’ concerns. Such banks are characterised by closer relationships with borrowers (relationship banking), as opposed to a formalised and automated approach (transactional banking). There is no consensus on the method for defining community banks. We presented an algorithm for determining community banks, taking into account the specifics of the Russian banking sector and revealed the following. A community bank is a profitable bank, in the funding structure of which half of the funds are funds from individuals, and in the allocated funds the share of the corporate loan portfolio predominates. Community banks have a balanced funding structure. Profitability of placement is consistently higher than the cost of funding for funds from legal entities, but has a very small differential for funds from individuals. The main factor in the growth of ROA for a community bank will most likely be an increase in net interest income, the main factor in decreasing ROA is the additional formation of reserves for corporate loans (at the same time, the loan portfolio of the community bank is of relatively high quality). Although the total loan portfolio of community banks is relatively small, their operations are deemed crucial in certain segments of the economy. The reason is that such banks possess a number of important features. The main purpose of our study is to explore and outline the differences between community banks and other (larger) banks. Identifying such differences is essential to understand the degree of heterogeneity in the banking sector. First, community banks are ready to deal with small borrowers and specialise in niche markets and industries. Approximately one third of the volume of corporate loans issued by a community bank are loans to small borrowers. Second, they are open to working with financial instruments of limited demand and/or customising products to meet the needs of a small group of clients. In addition, community banks are willing to handle loans that are limited in size and are not massmarket, and to take non-standard approaches to setting interest rates. The bulk of corporate loans issued by community banks will most likely go to companies that also have loans from other banks that are not classified as community. In addition, community banks are ready to work with medium-sized (and not massive) loans and approach setting rates in a customised manner. The community bank is active in the short-term corporate lending segment. At the same time, in lending to both medium/large and small borrowers, loans at a fixed rate and issuance under credit line agreements (CL) are more likely to prevail. In general, community banks show similar results relative to other groups. The findings rather indicate the stable position of community banks in the corporate lending market.
Suggested Citation
Anna Burova & Kristina Virovets & Denis Koshelev & Ekaterina Petreneva & Alexey Ponomarenko, 2024.
"Community Banking in Russia,"
Bank of Russia Working Paper Series
wps139, Bank of Russia.
Handle:
RePEc:bkr:wpaper:wps139
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
- G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
- D40 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bkr:wpaper:wps139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: BoR Research The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask BoR Research to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbrgvru.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.