IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2610.07363.html

Network Experiments with Edge Treatments and Node Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Artem Kuriksha
  • Kenneth Hung

Abstract

We present a methodology for analyzing node-level outcomes while experimenting with edge-level treatments in a population connected by an undirected graph. Under our design, nodes are randomly assigned to test or control, and each edge inherits the treatment of its endpoints, with conflicts resolved by randomization. We use each node's assigned status as an instrument for its treatment exposure. We show that the Wald estimator is consistent for the global average treatment effect (GATE), even when the edge weights used to construct the exposure are misspecified. We formalize the assumptions needed both in terms of the linearity of potential outcomes and the sparsity of the graph, and prove the asymptotic normality of the Wald estimator. The estimator is straightforward to implement, requiring no assignment simulations over the graph. Our Monte Carlo study demonstrates the strong performance of our approach in the context of a social platform.

Suggested Citation

  • Artem Kuriksha & Kenneth Hung, 2026. "Network Experiments with Edge Treatments and Node Outcomes," Papers 2610.07363, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.07363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.07363
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eckles Dean & Karrer Brian & Ugander Johan, 2017. "Design and Analysis of Experiments in Networks: Reducing Bias from Interference," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M., 1997. "On two stage least squares estimation of the average treatment effect in a random coefficient model," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 129-133, October.
    3. Eckles Dean & Karrer Brian & Ugander Johan, 2017. "Design and Analysis of Experiments in Networks: Reducing Bias from Interference," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-23, March.
    4. Joshua D. Angrist & Kathryn Graddy & Guido W. Imbens, 2000. "The Interpretation of Instrumental Variables Estimators in Simultaneous Equations Models with an Application to the Demand for Fish," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 67(3), pages 499-527.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Supriya Tiwari & Pallavi Basu, 2024. "Quasi-randomization tests for network interference: a random graph approach," Papers 2403.16673, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    2. Klein, Tobias J., 2010. "Heterogeneous treatment effects: Instrumental variables without monotonicity?," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 155(2), pages 99-116, April.
    3. Lee, Sokbae, 2007. "Endogeneity in quantile regression models: A control function approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 1131-1158, December.
    4. Denis Fougère & Nicolas Jacquemet, 2020. "Policy Evaluation Using Causal Inference Methods," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-03455978, HAL.
    5. Mogstad, Magne & Torgovitsky, Alexander, 2024. "Instrumental variables with unobserved heterogeneity in treatment effects," Handbook of Labor Economics,, Elsevier.
    6. Davide Viviano & Lihua Lei & Guido Imbens & Brian Karrer & Okke Schrijvers & Liang Shi, 2023. "Causal clustering: design of cluster experiments under network interference," Papers 2310.14983, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    7. Nilavra Pathak & Olivier Jeunen & Eric Lambert, 2026. "Auditing Marketing Budget Allocation with Hindsight Regret," Papers 2604.25977, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    8. Xuanqi Liu & Ke-Wei Huang, 2025. "Controlling Homophily in Social Network Regression Analysis by Machine Learning," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 37(3), pages 684-702, May.
    9. Luofeng Liao & Christian Kroer & Sergei Leonenkov & Okke Schrijvers & Liang Shi & Nicolas Stier-Moses & Congshan Zhang, 2024. "Interference Among First-Price Pacing Equilibria: A Bias and Variance Analysis," Papers 2402.07322, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    10. Nian Si, 2023. "Tackling Interference Induced by Data Training Loops in A/B Tests: A Weighted Training Approach," Papers 2310.17496, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    11. Stefan Wager & Kuang Xu, 2019. "Experimenting in Equilibrium," Papers 1903.02124, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    12. Ruoxuan Xiong & Alex Chin & Sean J. Taylor, 2024. "Data-Driven Switchback Experiments: Theoretical Tradeoffs and Empirical Bayes Designs," Papers 2406.06768, arXiv.org.
    13. Evan Munro & David Jones & Jennifer Brennan & Roland Nelet & Vahab Mirrokni & Jean Pouget-Abadie, 2023. "Causal Estimation of User Learning in Personalized Systems," Papers 2306.00485, arXiv.org.
    14. James J. Heckman & Vytlacil, Edward J., 2007. "Econometric Evaluation of Social Programs, Part II: Using the Marginal Treatment Effect to Organize Alternative Econometric Estimators to Evaluate Social Programs, and to Forecast their Effects in New Environments," Handbook of Econometrics, in: J.J. Heckman & E.E. Leamer (ed.), Handbook of Econometrics, edition 1, volume 6, chapter 71, Elsevier.
    15. Yuchen Hu & Shuangning Li & Stefan Wager, 2021. "Average Direct and Indirect Causal Effects under Interference," Papers 2104.03802, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    16. Gordon Dahl, 2010. "Early teen marriage and future poverty," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 47(3), pages 689-718, August.
    17. von Hinke Kessler Scholder S, 2009. "Genetic Markers as Instrumental Variables: An Application to Child Fat Mass and Academic Achievement," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 09/25, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    18. Shoya Ishimaru, 2024. "Empirical Decomposition of the IV-OLS Gap with Heterogeneous and Nonlinear Effects," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 106(2), pages 505-520, March.
    19. Myeong hwan Kim & Kwang Woo Park, 2009. "Did the price control achieve its goal?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 29(2), pages 1432-1442.
    20. Ziebarth, N. R. & Schmitt, M. & Karlsson, M., 2013. "The short-term population health effects of weather and pollution: implications of climate change," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 13/34, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.07363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.