IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2609.34169.html

From Word Counts to Context: Topic Models for Asset Pricing

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin Foley
  • Jonathan Hartadi
  • Shivesh Prakash
  • Swapnil Vatsal

Abstract

News may reveal systematic risk, but whether its context enhances the construction of systematic risk factors is still unclear. We seek to test whether utilizing a sentence transformer represents an improvement over techniques such as Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) in the coherence of topic term lists generated from unstructured text data. To test this, the same collection of unstructured text data comprising of 394,661 articles and the same downstream financial portfolio construction pipeline were applied with the text layer differing, including the length of article text each model used and how topic terms were ranked: we benchmark LDA against a frozen sentence transformer with k-means clustering. We find that the sentence transformer branch had higher observed scores both in terms of coherence (measured by NPMI) as well as financial performance (measured by Sharpe), although the available tests do not establish outperformance. Further exploratory specifications such as utilizing spherical clustering and multi-horizon exposures had an observed excess-return Sharpe of 1.03 for the combined model. We believe that there is some promise in applying context-aware techniques on unstructured news text, but stricter tests using only information available at each date and broader datasets may be required to enhance the confidence in the observed performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin Foley & Jonathan Hartadi & Shivesh Prakash & Swapnil Vatsal, 2026. "From Word Counts to Context: Topic Models for Asset Pricing," Papers 2609.34169, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.34169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.34169
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin William Cong & Tengyuan Liang & Xiao Zhang & Wu Zhu, 2025. "Textual Factors: A Scalable, Interpretable, and Data-Driven Approach to Analyzing Unstructured Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(12), pages 10727-10739, December.
    2. Dyer, Travis & Lang, Mark & Stice-Lawrence, Lorien, 2017. "The evolution of 10-K textual disclosure: Evidence from Latent Dirichlet Allocation," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 221-245.
    3. Hochberg, Yael V. & Kakhbod, Ali & Li, Peiyao & Sachdeva, Kunal, 2026. "Are patents with female inventors under-cited? Evidence from text estimation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    4. Zihan Dong & Xinyu Fan & Zhiyuan Peng, 2024. "FNSPID: A Comprehensive Financial News Dataset in Time Series," Papers 2402.06698, arXiv.org.
    5. Kelly, Bryan T. & Pruitt, Seth & Su, Yinan, 2019. "Characteristics are covariances: A unified model of risk and return," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(3), pages 501-524.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alex Kim & Maximilian Muhn & Valeri Nikolaev, 2023. "Bloated Disclosures: Can ChatGPT Help Investors Process Information?," Papers 2306.10224, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    2. Pinto, Inês & Morais, Ana Isabel & Quick, Reiner, 2020. "The impact of the precision of accounting standards on the expanded auditor’s report in the European Union," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    3. Riccardo Rebonato & Dherminder Kainth & Lionel Melin, 2025. "The Impact of Physical Climate Risk on the Valuation of Global Equity Assets," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(4), pages 857-894, April.
    4. McCannon, Bryan & Zhou, Yang & Hall, Joshua, 2021. "Measuring a Contract’s Breadth: A Text Analysis," Working Papers 11013, George Mason University, Mercatus Center.
    5. Yi Yang & Kunpeng Zhang & Yangyang Fan, 2023. "sDTM: A Supervised Bayesian Deep Topic Model for Text Analytics," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 137-156, March.
    6. Everett, Jeff & Shiraz Rahaman, Abu & Neu, Dean & Saxton, Gregory, 2024. "Letters to the editor, institutional experimentation, and the public accounting professional," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Alain-Philippe Fortin & Patrick Gagliardini & O. Scaillet, 2022. "Eigenvalue tests for the number of latent factors in short panels," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 22-81, Swiss Finance Institute.
    8. Zhang, Pengfei & Li, Ji, 2025. "Notice-and-takedown as dispute resolution: An empirical analysis of GitHub notices," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    9. Distelmans, Tineke & Cools, Martine & Grabner, Isabella & Stouthuysen, Kristof & Van den Abbeele, Alexandra, 2026. "Governing innovation: How technology maturity shapes R&D contracts," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    10. Chychyla, Roman & Leone, Andrew J. & Minutti-Meza, Miguel, 2019. "Complexity of financial reporting standards and accounting expertise," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 226-253.
    11. Maik Dierkes & Sebastian Schroen, 2023. "Betting against sentiment? Seemingly unrelated anomalies and the low‐risk effect," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(2), pages 152-176, April.
    12. Cederburg, Scott & O’Doherty, Michael S. & Wang, Feifei & Yan, Xuemin (Sterling), 2020. "On the performance of volatility-managed portfolios," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 95-117.
    13. Cong Wang, 2024. "Stock return prediction with multiple measures using neural network models," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-34, December.
    14. Li, Rui & Li, Jianping & Zhu, Xiaoqian, 2025. "Downside belief disagreements and financial instability: Evidence from risk factor disclosures in U.S. financial institutions’ 10-K filings," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    15. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:10:p:1281-1288 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Barth, Mary E. & Cahan, Steven F. & Chen, Li & Venter, Elmar R. & Wang, Ruili, 2025. "Textual dimensions of sustainability information, stock price informativeness, and proprietary costs: Evidence from integrated reports," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(3).
    17. Zhu, Xiaoqian & Sun, Hao & Chang, Yanpeng & Li, Jianping, 2026. "Predicting financial distress using textual risk disclosures in annual reports: How and what risks are disclosed?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(3).
    18. Wang, Sumingyue & Wang, Xinlu & Xu, Liang, 2023. "Debt maturity structure and the quality of risk disclosures," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    19. Jeong-Bon Kim & Chong Wang & Feng Wu, 2023. "The real effects of risk disclosures: evidence from climate change reporting in 10-Ks," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 2271-2318, December.
    20. Shunyao Wang & Ming Cheng & Christina Dan Wang, 2025. "NewsNet-SDF: Stochastic Discount Factor Estimation with Pretrained Language Model News Embeddings via Adversarial Networks," Papers 2505.06864, arXiv.org.
    21. Christian Fieberg & Daniel Metko & Thorsten Poddig & Thomas Loy, 2023. "Machine learning techniques for cross-sectional equity returns’ prediction," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 45(1), pages 289-323, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.34169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.