IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2609.33471.html

A One-Saddle 1/5 Approximation Algorithm for Common-Kernel Bimatrix Games: Recognition, Exact Segment Optimization, Sharp Selector Bounds, and Certified Robustness

Author

Listed:
  • Davit Gondauri

Abstract

We study a fixed-normalization class of symmetric bimatrix games generated by a common kernel and show that it admits efficient approximation despite exact symmetric-equilibrium computation remaining PPAD-hard. For every rational game in the class, a single auxiliary zero-sum saddle computation yields a rational symmetric \(1/5\)-approximate Nash equilibrium in polynomial time. We also give exact recognition and unique kernel recovery, and an exact polynomial-time post-processing algorithm that minimizes regret along the segment joining the selected saddle strategies. For arbitrary rational square games, we formulate the nearest common-kernel projection as a linear program with an explicit dual certificate, obtaining a certified \((1/5+2\eta^*)\)-approximation guarantee. A separate selector result proves a sharp regret-to-uniformity constant for the full-subset construction. The results provide a tractable and certifiable structured-game regime and clarify which common-kernel reduction architectures cannot support certain fine-grained approximation-hardness objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Davit Gondauri, 2026. "A One-Saddle 1/5 Approximation Algorithm for Common-Kernel Bimatrix Games: Recognition, Exact Segment Optimization, Sharp Selector Bounds, and Certified Robustness," Papers 2609.33471, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.33471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.33471
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sung-Ha Hwang & Luc Rey-Bellet, 2011. "Decompositions of two player games: potential, zero-sum, and stable games," Working Papers 1116, Nam Duck-Woo Economic Research Institute, Sogang University (Former Research Institute for Market Economy).
    2. Ozan Candogan & Ishai Menache & Asuman Ozdaglar & Pablo A. Parrilo, 2011. "Flows and Decompositions of Games: Harmonic and Potential Games," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 474-503, August.
    3. Hanyu Li & Dongchen Li & Xiaotie Deng, 2026. "Discovering expert-level Nash equilibrium algorithms with large language models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 17(1), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Szabó, György & Király, Balázs, 2025. "Orthogonal elementary interactions for bimatrix games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 677(C).
    2. Szabó, György & Borsos, István & Szombati, Edit, 2019. "Games, graphs and Kirchhoff laws," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 521(C), pages 416-423.
    3. Tom Johnston & Michael Savery & Alex Scott & Bassel Tarbush, 2023. "Game Connectivity and Adaptive Dynamics," Papers 2309.10609, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    4. Christian Ewerhart, 2020. "Ordinal potentials in smooth games," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 70(4), pages 1069-1100, November.
    5. Thomas Demuynck & Christian Seel & Giang Tran, 2019. "Measuring Competitiveness and Cooperativeness," Working Papers ECARES 2019-12, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    6. Ben Amiet & Andrea Collevecchio & Marco Scarsini & Ziwen Zhong, 2021. "Pure Nash Equilibria and Best-Response Dynamics in Random Games," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 1552-1572, November.
    7. Nelson Vadori, 2022. "Calibration of Derivative Pricing Models: a Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Perspective," Papers 2203.06865, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    8. Joseph Abdou & Nikolaos Pnevmatikos & Marco Scarsini, 2014. "Uniformity and games decomposition," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 14084r, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne, revised Mar 2017.
    9. Newton, Jonathan & Sercombe, Damian, 2020. "Agency, potential and contagion," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 79-97.
    10. Mete c{S}eref Ahunbay & Paul W. Goldberg & Edwin Lock & Panayotis Mertikopoulos & Bary S. R. Pradelski & Bassel Tarbush, 2026. "Avoiding the Worst: The Computational Complexity of Not Worst-Responding," Papers 2602.10966, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2026.
    11. Tongseok Lim, 2021. "Axiomatic and Probabilistic Foundations for the Hodge-Theoretic Shapley Value," Papers 2106.15094, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    12. Hwang, Sung-Ha & Rey-Bellet, Luc, 2020. "Strategic decompositions of normal form games: Zero-sum games and potential games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 370-390.
    13. Wolpert, David & Harper, Kyle, 2024. "The computational power of a human society: a new model of social evolution," SocArXiv qj83z, Center for Open Science.
    14. Hellmann, Tim & Staudigl, Mathias, 2014. "Evolution of social networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(3), pages 583-596.
    15. Stern, Ari & Tettenhorst, Alexander, 2019. "Hodge decomposition and the Shapley value of a cooperative game," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 186-198.
    16. David H. Wolpert & Kyle Harper, 2024. "The computational power of a human society: a new model of social evolution," Papers 2408.08861, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2025.
    17. Tongseok Lim, 2021. "Hodge theoretic reward allocation for generalized cooperative games on graphs," Papers 2107.10510, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    18. Joseph Abdou & Nikolaos Pnevmatikos & Marco Scarsini & Xavier Venel, 2022. "Decomposition of Games: Some Strategic Considerations," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 176-208, February.
    19. Stefan Penczynski & Stefania Sitzia & Jiwei Zheng, 2020. "Compound games, focal points, and the framing of collective and individual interests," Working Papers 305138214, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    20. Lina Mallozzi & Armando Sacco, 2022. "Stackelberg-Nash equilibrium and quasi harmonic games," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(2), pages 1029-1041, November.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.33471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.