IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2609.32377.html

Who Pays When Shared Infrastructure Fails? Zero Liquid Discharge, the Utilisation Trap, and the Incidence of Compliance Cost in India's Textile and Tannery Clusters

Author

Listed:
  • Mihika Singhania

Abstract

Many countries require factories to recycle almost all their wastewater and return none to rivers, a standard called zero liquid discharge (ZLD); in India, courts have imposed it on textile and leather clusters. Yet when enforcement tightens, small firms close while larger polluters often endure. This paper asks why, comparing Tirupur, where closures have already occurred, with Kanpur's Jajmau tanneries, where they are ongoing. Small firms depend on shared treatment plants they do not control. As these plants become underused, costs rise, performance declines, and firms with in-house treatment are better able to withstand enforcement. Because compliance is judged by equipment ownership rather than measured discharge, plant failure is attributed to member firms. This final step is the best evidenced, while the earlier links remain suggestive. The paper recommends judging compliance by measured discharge and determining whether the plant or the firm has failed before closure, so enforcement targets pollution rather than the firms least able to absorb it.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihika Singhania, 2026. "Who Pays When Shared Infrastructure Fails? Zero Liquid Discharge, the Utilisation Trap, and the Incidence of Compliance Cost in India's Textile and Tannery Clusters," Papers 2609.32377, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.32377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.32377
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kala, Namrata & Haseeb, Muhammad & Fenske, James, 2025. "Environmental Permits, Regulatory Burden, and Firm Outcomes," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 784, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    2. Forslid, Rikard & Okubo, Toshihiro & Ulltveit-Moe, Karen Helene, 2018. "Why are firms that export cleaner? International trade, abatement and environmental emissions," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 166-183.
    3. Esther Duflo & Michael Greenstone & Rohini Pande & Nicholas Ryan, 2018. "The Value of Regulatory Discretion: Estimates From Environmental Inspections in India," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 86(6), pages 2123-2160, November.
    4. Michael Greenstone & Rema Hanna, 2014. "Environmental Regulations, Air and Water Pollution, and Infant Mortality in India," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(10), pages 3038-3072, October.
    5. Goldar, Bishwanath & Misra, Smita & Mukherji, Badal, 2001. "Water pollution abatement cost function: methodological issues and an application to small-scale factories in an industrial estate in India," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(1), pages 103-122, February.
    6. Dasgupta, Nandini, 2000. "Environmental Enforcement and Small Industries in India: Reworking the Problem in the Poverty Context," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 945-967, May.
    7. Besanko, David, 1987. "Performance versus design standards in the regulation of pollution," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 19-44, October.
    8. Gupta, Shreekant & Saksena, Shalini & Baris, Omer F., 2019. "Environmental enforcement and compliance in developing countries: Evidence from India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 313-327.
    9. Michael Greenstone & Rohini Pande & Nicholas Ryan & Anant Sudarshan, 2025. "Can Pollution Markets Work in Developing Countries? Experimental Evidence from India," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 140(2), pages 1003-1060.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dan Xie, 2024. "China’s Manufacturing Pollution, Environmental Regulation and Trade," FIW Working Paper series 198, FIW.
    2. Jaraitė, Jūratė & Kurtyka, Oliwia & Ollivier, Hélène, 2022. "Take a ride on the (not so) green side: How do CDM projects affect Indian manufacturing firms’ environmental performance?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    3. Yuping Deng & Yanrui Wu & Helian Xu, 2022. "Emission Reduction and Value-added Export Nexus at Firm Level," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 22-19, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    4. Christopher Hansman & Jonas Hjort & Gianmarco León-Ciliotta, 2015. "Firms' Response and Unintended Health Consequences of Industrial Regulations," Working Papers 809, Barcelona School of Economics.
    5. Barrows, Geoffrey & Ollivier, Hélène, 2021. "Foreign demand, developing country exports, and CO2 emissions: Firm-level evidence from India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    6. Li, Yue & Zhao, Jing, 2026. "The effectiveness of carbon emission trading system: Evidence from China's regional markets," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    7. Zhao, Runhao & Yuan, Ye, 2026. "Strategic emissions in the rain," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    8. Li, Pei & Liu, Kaihao & Lu, Yi & Peng, Lu, 2025. "Organizing regulatory structure and local air quality: Evidence from the environmental vertical management reform in China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 139-164.
    9. Chen, Jidong & Shi, Xinzheng & Zhang, Ming-ang & Zhang, Sihan, 2024. "Centralization of environmental administration and air pollution: Evidence from China," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    10. Guan, Jin & He, Dongwei & Zhu, Qigui, 2022. "More incentive, less pollution: The influence of official appraisal system reform on environmental enforcement," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    11. Michael Greenstone & Guojun He & Ruixue Jia & Tong Liu, 2020. "Can Technology Solve the Principal-Agent Problem? Evidence from China’s War on Air Pollution," Working Papers 2020-87, Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics.
    12. Christopher Hansman & Jonas Hjort & Gianmarco León, 2019. "Interlinked firms and the consequences of piecemeal regulation," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(3), pages 876-916.
    13. Claire Lepault, 2023. "Is urban wastewater treatment effective in India? Evidence from water quality and infant mortality," CIRED Working Papers hal-04232407, HAL.
    14. Geoffrey Barrows & Helene Ollivier, 2018. "Foreign Demand and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Empirical Evidence with Implications for Leakage," Working Papers 2018.16, FAERE - French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
    15. Olexiy Kyrychenko, 2021. "The Impact of the Crisis-inducted Reduction in Air Pollution on Infant Mortality in India: A Policy Perspective," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp702, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    16. Pedro Naso, 2019. "Environmental Regulation in a Transitional Political System: Delegation of Regulation and Perceived Corruption in South Africa," CIES Research Paper series 59-2019, Centre for International Environmental Studies, The Graduate Institute.
    17. Shao, Shuai & Xu, Le & Yang, Lili & Yu, Dianfan, 2024. "How do energy-saving policies improve environmental quality: Evidence from China’s Top 10,000 energy-consuming enterprises program," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    18. Naso, Pedro, 2024. "Delegation of environmental regulation and perceived corruption in South Africa," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79.
    19. Wang, Huanhuan & Zhang, Zhiqiang & Zhao, Xiaoxue, 2025. "Trade-linked pandemic, enforcement gap, and pollution," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    20. Jagnani, Maulik & Mahadevan, Meera, 2025. "Women leaders improve environmental outcomes: Evidence from crop fires in India," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.32377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.