IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2607.18866.html

Optimizing Regret

Author

Listed:
  • Irene Aldridge

Abstract

Building on the identity that expected regret equals the covariance between costs and decisions, this paper develops a derivative theory of the covariance regret functional. We derive the G\^ateaux derivative, showing that the universal steepest-descent direction is the contrarian policy $-(c-\bar c)$, while ascent yields momentum. For linear policies $\hat\pi(c)=Ac+b$, the gradient is the cost covariance matrix $\Sigma_c$, with a zero Hessian implying boundary-optimal solutions such as the minimum-variance portfolio. We extend to constrained optimization, sign-gradient duality between regret minimization and alpha maximization, finite-sample convergence bounds paralleling Thompson Sampling, and gradient-descent algorithms requiring only input observations.

Suggested Citation

  • Irene Aldridge, 2026. "Optimizing Regret," Papers 2607.18866, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2607.18866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.18866
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hui Chen & Antoine Didisheim & Luciano A. Somoza, 2026. "Out of the Black Box: Uncertainty Quantification for LLMs via Conditional Probabilities," NBER Working Papers 34965, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. David P. Helmbold & Robert E. Schapire & Yoram Singer & Manfred K. Warmuth, 1998. "On‐Line Portfolio Selection Using Multiplicative Updates," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(4), pages 325-347, October.
    3. Sergiu Hart & Andreu Mas-Colell, 2013. "A Simple Adaptive Procedure Leading To Correlated Equilibrium," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Simple Adaptive Strategies From Regret-Matching to Uncoupled Dynamics, chapter 2, pages 17-46, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. Adam N. Elmachtoub & Paul Grigas, 2022. "Smart “Predict, then Optimize”," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 9-26, January.
    5. Thomas M. Cover, 1991. "Universal Portfolios," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(1), pages 1-29, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seung-Hyun Moon & Yong-Hyuk Kim & Byung-Ro Moon, 2019. "Empirical investigation of state-of-the-art mean reversion strategies for equity markets," Papers 1909.04327, arXiv.org.
    2. Rémi Jézéquel & Dmitrii M. Ostrovskii & Pierre Gaillard, 2026. "Efficient and Near-Optimal Online Portfolio Selection," Post-Print hal-03787674, HAL.
    3. Irene Aldridge, 2026. "Evaluating AI Investment Strategies," Papers 2606.08791, arXiv.org.
    4. Man Yiu Tsang & Tony Sit & Hoi Ying Wong, 2022. "Adaptive Robust Online Portfolio Selection," Papers 2206.01064, arXiv.org.
    5. R'emi J'ez'equel & Dmitrii M. Ostrovskii & Pierre Gaillard, 2022. "Efficient and Near-Optimal Online Portfolio Selection," Papers 2209.13932, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.
    6. James Chok & Geoffrey M. Vasil, 2023. "Convex optimization over a probability simplex," Papers 2305.09046, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    7. Bin Li & Steven C. H. Hoi, 2012. "On-Line Portfolio Selection with Moving Average Reversion," Papers 1206.4626, arXiv.org.
    8. Ha, Youngmin & Zhang, Hai, 2020. "Algorithmic trading for online portfolio selection under limited market liquidity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 1033-1051.
    9. Roujia Li & Jia Liu, 2022. "Online Portfolio Selection with Long-Short Term Forecasting," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Ting-Kam Leonard Wong, 2015. "Universal portfolios in stochastic portfolio theory," Papers 1510.02808, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2016.
    11. Yong Zhang & Xingyu Yang, 2017. "Online Portfolio Selection Strategy Based on Combining Experts’ Advice," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 50(1), pages 141-159, June.
    12. Jiayu Li, 2026. "KellyBoost: Growth-Optimal Portfolio Construction with Gradient-Boosted Trees," Papers 2608.23393, arXiv.org.
    13. Zhengyao Jiang & Dixing Xu & Jinjun Liang, 2017. "A Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework for the Financial Portfolio Management Problem," Papers 1706.10059, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2017.
    14. Shuo Sun & Rundong Wang & Bo An, 2021. "Reinforcement Learning for Quantitative Trading," Papers 2109.13851, arXiv.org.
    15. Esther Mohr & Robert Dochow, 2017. "Risk management strategies for finding universal portfolios," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 256(1), pages 129-147, September.
    16. Dmitry B. Rokhlin, 2020. "Relative utility bounds for empirically optimal portfolios," Papers 2006.05204, arXiv.org.
    17. Rémi Jézéquel & Dmitrii Ostrovskii & Pierre Gaillard, 2026. "Efficient and Near-Optimal Online Portfolio Selection," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 1350-1384, May.
    18. Hao Chen & Changxin Xu, 2025. "Enhancing Decision-Making in Complex Environments: A Multi-Expert Decision System and Simulation-Driven Efficiency Measurement Approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 34(5), pages 961-991, October.
    19. Leonard C. MacLean & Yonggan Zhao & William T. Ziemba, 2016. "Optimal capital growth with convex shortfall penalties," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 101-117, January.
    20. DeMarzo, Peter M. & Kremer, Ilan & Mansour, Yishay, 2016. "Robust option pricing: Hannan and Blackwell meet Black and Scholes," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 410-434.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2607.18866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.