IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2607.02898.html

Conformalized Lee Inference: Distribution-Free Individual Treatment Effect Intervals under Monotone Sample Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Jung Hyub Lee

Abstract

Empirical studies often observe outcomes only for selected units, and treatment may change who is observed. This paper studies prediction in randomized studies with one-sided selection. Standard prediction intervals can fail because treated selected observations are not the same group as selected controls. The paper asks how to predict missing treated outcomes and individual treatment effects for always-observed units. The proposed conformalized Lee procedure uses treated selected observations to train and check any prediction rule, then adjusts the cutoff using the observed treatment-control selection gap. For selected controls, the missing treated-outcome interval is shifted by the observed untreated outcome to produce an individual treatment-effect interval. The method provides reliable coverage without requiring the prediction rule to be correctly specified. The key result shows that the proposed adjustment uses the exact amount of uncertainty implied by the monotone selection logic of Lee [2009]. In simulations, ordinary conformal prediction demonstrates a lower coverage rate under selection-induced distribution shift, while the Lee-adjusted methods achieve the desired coverage rate. The results show that the proposed selection correction method can support reliable counterfactual prediction, while retaining practical implementation with modern prediction tools.

Suggested Citation

  • Jung Hyub Lee, 2026. "Conformalized Lee Inference: Distribution-Free Individual Treatment Effect Intervals under Monotone Sample Selection," Papers 2607.02898, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2607.02898
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.02898
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heiler, Phillip, 2024. "Heterogeneous treatment effect bounds under sample selection with an application to the effects of social media on political polarization," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 244(1).
    2. Semenova, Vira, 2025. "Generalized Lee bounds," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    3. Victor Chernozhukov & Kaspar Wüthrich & Yinchu Zhu, 2021. "An Exact and Robust Conformal Inference Method for Counterfactual and Synthetic Controls," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 116(536), pages 1849-1864, October.
    4. Constantine E. Frangakis & Donald B. Rubin, 2002. "Principal Stratification in Causal Inference," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(1), pages 21-29, March.
    5. Jacob Dorn & Kevin Guo, 2021. "Sharp Sensitivity Analysis for Inverse Propensity Weighting via Quantile Balancing," Papers 2102.04543, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
    6. Mingzhang Yin & Claudia Shi & Yixin Wang & David M. Blei, 2024. "Conformal Sensitivity Analysis for Individual Treatment Effects," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 119(545), pages 122-135, January.
    7. Jacob Dorn & Kevin Guo & Nathan Kallus, 2025. "Doubly-Valid/Doubly-Sharp Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Inference with Unmeasured Confounding," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 120(549), pages 331-342, January.
    8. Honoré, Bo E. & Hu, Luojia, 2024. "Sample selection models without exclusion restrictions: Parameter heterogeneity and partial identification," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 243(1).
    9. Bo E. Honoré & Luojia Hu, 2020. "Selection Without Exclusion," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(3), pages 1007-1029, May.
    10. Jacob Dorn & Kevin Guo, 2023. "Sharp Sensitivity Analysis for Inverse Propensity Weighting via Quantile Balancing," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 118(544), pages 2645-2657, October.
    11. Daisuke Kurisu & Yuta Okamoto & Taisuke Otsu, 2026. "Lee Bounds for Random Objects," Papers 2601.09453, arXiv.org.
    12. Vira Semenova, 2020. "Generalized Lee Bounds," Papers 2008.12720, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    13. Jing Lei & Max G’Sell & Alessandro Rinaldo & Ryan J. Tibshirani & Larry Wasserman, 2018. "Distribution-Free Predictive Inference for Regression," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(523), pages 1094-1111, July.
    14. Yingying Dong & Phillip Heiler, 2026. "Sharp Bounds and Inference in Sample Selection Models with Treatment Endogeneity," Papers 2606.09223, arXiv.org.
    15. Lihua Lei & Emmanuel J. Candès, 2021. "Conformal inference of counterfactuals and individual treatment effects," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 83(5), pages 911-938, November.
    16. Horowitz, Joel L & Manski, Charles F, 1995. "Identification and Robustness with Contaminated and Corrupted Data," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 63(2), pages 281-302, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yingying Dong & Phillip Heiler, 2026. "Sharp Bounds and Inference in Sample Selection Models with Treatment Endogeneity," Papers 2606.09223, arXiv.org.
    2. Gevorg Khandamiryan & Vira Semenova, 2026. "Adaptive Estimation of Aggregated Values of Conditional Linear Programs," Papers 2606.08359, arXiv.org.
    3. Phillip Heiler & Asbj{o}rn Kaufmann & Bezirgen Veliyev, 2024. "Treatment Evaluation at the Intensive and Extensive Margins," Papers 2412.11179, arXiv.org.
    4. Aditya Ghosh & Dominik Rothenhausler, 2025. "Which Covariates to Adjust for? Specification-robust Causal Inference in Observational Studies," Papers 2505.08729, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    5. Ying Jin & Zhimei Ren & Zhengyuan Zhou, 2026. "Sensitivity Analysis Under the f -Sensitivity Model: A Distributional Robustness Perspective," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 74(2), pages 860-878, March.
    6. Zequn Jin & Gaoqian Xu & Xi Zheng & Yahong Zhou, 2025. "Policy Learning under Unobserved Confounding: A Robust and Efficient Approach," Papers 2507.20550, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2026.
    7. Semenova, Vira, 2025. "Generalized Lee bounds," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    8. Daisuke Kurisu & Yuta Okamoto & Taisuke Otsu, 2026. "Lee Bounds for Random Objects," Papers 2601.09453, arXiv.org.
    9. Ying-Ying Lee & Chu-An Liu, 2024. "Lee Bounds with a Continuous Treatment in Sample Selection," Papers 2411.04312, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    10. Haoge Chang & Zeyang Yu, 2026. "Randomization Inference For the Always-Reporter Average Treatment Effect," Papers 2603.24970, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    11. David M. Ritzwoller & Joseph P. Romano & Azeem M. Shaikh, 2024. "Randomization Inference: Theory and Applications," Papers 2406.09521, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2025.
    12. Martin Huber & Giovanni Mellace, 2014. "Testing exclusion restrictions and additive separability in sample selection models," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 75-92, August.
    13. Melody Huang & Cory McCartan, 2025. "Relative Bias Under Imperfect Identification in Observational Causal Inference," Papers 2507.23743, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    14. Bartalotti, Otávio & Kédagni, Désiré & Possebom, Vitor, 2023. "Identifying marginal treatment effects in the presence of sample selection," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 565-584.
    15. Yanqin Fan & Carlos A. Manzanares & Hyeonseok Park & Yuan Qi, 2026. "A Sensitivity Analysis of the Surrogate Index Approach for Estimating Long-Term Treatment Effects," Papers 2603.00580, arXiv.org.
    16. Linbo Wang & Thomas S. Richardson & Xiao-Hua Zhou, 2017. "Causal analysis of ordinal treatments and binary outcomes under truncation by death," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(3), pages 719-735, June.
    17. Imai, Kosuke, 2008. "Sharp bounds on the causal effects in randomized experiments with "truncation-by-death"," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 144-149, February.
    18. Alvarez, Luis A.F. & Chiann, Chang & Morettin, Pedro A., 2025. "Inference on model parameters with many L-moments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 252(PA).
    19. Alexander Almeida & Susan Athey & Guido Imbens & Eva Lestant & Alexia Olaizola, 2025. "Estimating Variances for Causal Panel Data Estimators," Papers 2510.11841, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    20. Matthew A. Masten & Alexandre Poirier & Muyang Ren, 2025. "A General Approach to Relaxing Unconfoundedness," Papers 2501.15400, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2607.02898. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.