IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2607.02795.html

Coordinated Sniper Cohorts on Pump.fun: Detection of 1,012 Persistent Wallet Rings and a Contamination-Adjusted Estimate of Coordination-Specific First-Hour Buyer-Flow Lift

Author

Listed:
  • Arati Uday Kamat

Abstract

Motivated by Kyle (1985) informed order flow and the Meiklejohn et al. (2013) wallet-clustering tradition, we ask whether persistent coordinated wallets causally raise first-hour buyer flow on the Solana pump.fun bonding-curve marketplace. Using 1,578,333 buyer observations from 166,098 launches over 13.4 days (2026-06-11 to 2026-06-25), a two-stage detection pipeline (intra-launch first-buyer-window extraction plus cross-launch persistent-cohort surfacing via union-find on co-occurrence graphs) identifies 1,012 persistent wallet cohorts (2 to 12 wallets, 2,965 addresses) that systematically co-fire as early buyers. Under a contamination-adjusted estimator excluding cohort wallets' own buyer events from the outcome, 1:1 nearest-neighbour propensity-score matching with a 0.2-SD caliper on ten launch-quality covariates (Rosenbaum-Rubin, 1983) yields a first-30-minute buyer-count lift of +16.1% (95% CI [+13.0%, +19.4%]) on 5,419 matched pairs; the corresponding SOL-inflow lift is +6.3% ([-0.5%, +15.1%]), not distinguishable from zero. The naive contaminated same-universe pooled contrast is +130.9%; approximately half is arithmetic contamination from cohort wallets' own buys in the outcome (dropping to +63.9% after cohort exclusion), and most of the remainder is absorbed by PSM on launch-quality covariates. A parallel activity-matched placebo across 100 seeds produces lifts with median +189.6%, above zero and above the real lift in 100/100 seeds, indicating the placebo estimator is biased; we retain it as a bias diagnostic. Of 5,419 treated launches, 382 (7.0%) had zero non-cohort buyers in the first 30 minutes. We release the full cohort catalogue, detection code, PSM script, and robustness artefacts as RED-COHORT-2026-v1 under CC-BY-4.0.

Suggested Citation

  • Arati Uday Kamat, 2026. "Coordinated Sniper Cohorts on Pump.fun: Detection of 1,012 Persistent Wallet Rings and a Contamination-Adjusted Estimate of Coordination-Specific First-Hour Buyer-Flow Lift," Papers 2607.02795, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2026.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2607.02795
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.02795
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sam M. Werner & Daniel Perez & Lewis Gudgeon & Ariah Klages-Mundt & Dominik Harz & William J. Knottenbelt, 2021. "SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi)," Papers 2101.08778, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2022.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Son, Bumho & Lee, Yunyoung & Jang, Huisu, 2025. "A two-stage game model of probabilistic price manipulation in decentralized exchanges," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    2. Jiahua Xu & Nikhil Vadgama, 2021. "From banks to DeFi: the evolution of the lending market," Papers 2104.00970, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    3. Bruno Mazorra & Victor Adan & Vanesa Daza, 2022. "Do not rug on me: Zero-dimensional Scam Detection," Papers 2201.07220, arXiv.org.
    4. Nathalie Oriol & Maggie Chen & William Knottenbelt & Iryna Veryzhenko, 2025. "Challenges, Opportunities, and Drivers in Digital Finance [Défis, Opportunités et leviers en Finance Digitale]," Post-Print hal-05236865, HAL.
    5. C Castro-Iragorri & J RamÔøΩrez & S VÔøΩlez, 2021. "Financial intermediation and risk in decentralized lending protocols," Documentos de Trabajo 19420, Universidad del Rosario.
    6. Serhii Zashchypas, 2025. "Formation of Money Supply, Taking into Account the Role of Virtual Assets," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 2, pages 40-49, June.
    7. Şoiman, Florentina & Dumas, Jean-Guillaume & Jimenez-Garces, Sonia, 2023. "What drives DeFi market returns?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    8. Yuquan Li & Yuexin Xiang & Qin Wang & Tsz Hon Yuen & Andreas Deppeler & Jiangshan Yu, 2026. "SoK: Stablecoins in Retail Payments," Papers 2601.00196, arXiv.org.
    9. Nadler, Matthias & Schuler, Katrin & Schär, Fabian, 2026. "Blockchain price oracles: Accuracy and violation recovery," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    10. Yixin Cao & Chuanwei Zou & Xianfeng Cheng, 2021. "Flashot: A Snapshot of Flash Loan Attack on DeFi Ecosystem," Papers 2102.00626, arXiv.org.
    11. Carlos Castro-Iragorri & Julian Ramirez & Sebastian Velez, 2021. "Financial intermediation and risk in decentralized lending protocols," Papers 2107.14678, arXiv.org.
    12. Shiyu Zhang & Zining Wang & Jin Zheng & John Cartlidge, 2026. "Systemic Risk in DeFi: A Network-Based Fragility Analysis of TVL Dynamics," Papers 2601.08540, arXiv.org.
    13. Lucy Huo & Ariah Klages-Mundt & Andreea Minca & Frederik Christian Munter & Mads Rude Wind, 2021. "Decentralized Governance of Stablecoins with Closed Form Valuation," Papers 2109.08939, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    14. Raffaella Barone & Friedrich Schneider, 2026. "Beyond the veil: unpacking money laundering through economic models, emerging technologies, and government capture," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 1-29, December.
    15. Murad Farzulla & Andrew Maksakov, 2026. "ASRI: An Aggregated Systemic Risk Index for Cryptocurrency Markets," Papers 2602.03874, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2026.
    16. Nam Anh Le, 2026. "Funding-Aware Optimal Market Making for Perpetual DEXs," Papers 2605.06405, arXiv.org.
    17. Wenbin Wu & Kejiang Qian & Alexis Lui & Christopher Jack & Yue Wu & Peter McBurney & Fengxiang He & Bryan Zhang, 2025. "DeXposure: A Dataset and Benchmarks for Inter-protocol Credit Exposure in Decentralized Financial Networks," Papers 2511.22314, arXiv.org.
    18. Ngo Thai Hung & Nguyen Tran The Dan & Tran Bui Hong Tuoi & Pham Thuy Anh & Nguyen Thuy Thanh Ngan & Luyen Nhat Tam, 2026. "Spillover effects between DeFi assets and ASEAN-6 stock markets," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 50(1), pages 1-30, December.
    19. Bruno Mazorra & Victor Adan & Vanesa Daza, 2022. "Do Not Rug on Me: Leveraging Machine Learning Techniques for Automated Scam Detection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-24, March.
    20. Teng Andrea Xu & Jiahua Xu, 2022. "A Short Survey on Business Models of Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Protocols," Papers 2202.07742, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2607.02795. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.