IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2604.09858.html

Coupling Designs for Randomized Experiments with Complex Treatments

Author

Listed:
  • Max Cytrynbaum
  • Fredrik Savje

Abstract

We describe a new family of coupling designs, extending the basic principle of stratified randomization to experiments with continuous, constrained multivariate, text/image and other irregular treatment spaces. Our approach is to first match units into homogeneous groups, then use Monte Carlo coupling techniques to assign within-group treatments that are highly dispersed over the treatment space. We show that ensuring similar experimental units receive highly dissimilar treatments generically improves estimation efficiency. In particular, the efficiency gains from a coupling design are proportional to the product of dispersion and match quality, where dispersion measures how spread out the treatment assignments are under a given coupling relative to independent randomization. We develop a new spectral analysis, revealing how efficiency depends on a match between the smoothness and shape of the estimator's influence function and the principal directions of a given coupling. We illustrate how coupling designs work in practice using a cash transfer experiment in development economics and a discrete-choice experiment in two-sided marketplaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Max Cytrynbaum & Fredrik Savje, 2026. "Coupling Designs for Randomized Experiments with Complex Treatments," Papers 2604.09858, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2604.09858
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.09858
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pierre L'Ecuyer & Christiane Lemieux, 2000. "Variance Reduction via Lattice Rules," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(9), pages 1214-1235, September.
    2. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/5rkqqmvrn4tl22s9mc4c7eg1p is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Nicole E. Pashley & Luke W. Miratrix, 2021. "Insights on Variance Estimation for Blocked and Matched Pairs Designs," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(3), pages 271-296, June.
    4. Marianne Bertrand & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2004. "Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(4), pages 991-1013, September.
    5. Yuehao Bai & Jizhou Liu & Max Tabord‐Meehan, 2024. "Inference for matched tuples and fully blocked factorial designs," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(2), pages 279-330, May.
    6. Max Cytrynbaum, 2021. "Fine Stratification of Survey Experiments," Papers 2111.08157, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    7. Christopher Harshaw & Fredrik Savje & Yitan Wang, 2022. "A General Design-Based Framework and Estimator for Randomized Experiments," Papers 2210.08698, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2025.
    8. Yuehao Bai, 2022. "Optimality of Matched-Pair Designs in Randomized Controlled Trials," Papers 2206.07845, arXiv.org.
    9. Christopher Harshaw & Fredrik Sävje & Daniel A. Spielman & Peng Zhang, 2024. "Balancing Covariates in Randomized Experiments with the Gram–Schmidt Walk Design," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 119(548), pages 2934-2946, October.
    10. Colin B. Fogarty, 2018. "On mitigating the analytical limitations of finely stratified experiments," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 80(5), pages 1035-1056, November.
    11. Guillaume Carlier & Alfred Galichon & Filippo Santambrogio, 2010. "From Knothe's transport to Brenier's map and a continuation method for optimal transport," Post-Print hal-01023796, HAL.
    12. Federico A. Bugni & Ivan A. Canay & Azeem M. Shaikh, 2019. "Inference under covariate‐adaptive randomization with multiple treatments," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 10(4), pages 1747-1785, November.
    13. Cai, Yong & Rafi, Ahnaf, 2024. "On the performance of the Neyman Allocation with small pilots," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 242(1).
    14. Guillaume Carlier & Alfred Galichon & Filippo Santambrogio, 2010. "From Knothe's transport to Brenier's map and a continuation method for optimal transport," SciencePo Working papers hal-01023796, HAL.
    15. Kasy, Maximilian, 2016. "Why Experimenters Might Not Always Want to Randomize, and What They Could Do Instead," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(3), pages 324-338, July.
    16. Yuehao Bai, 2022. "Optimality of Matched-Pair Designs in Randomized Controlled Trials," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(12), pages 3911-3940, December.
    17. Guillaume Carlier & Alfred Galichon & Filippo Santambrogio, 2010. "From Knothe's transport to Brenier's map and a continuation method for optimal transport," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-01023796, HAL.
    18. Miriam Bruhn & David McKenzie, 2009. "In Pursuit of Balance: Randomization in Practice in Development Field Experiments," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 1(4), pages 200-232, October.
    19. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/5rkqqmvrn4tl22s9mc4c7eg1p is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Yitzhaki, Shlomo, 1996. "On Using Linear Regressions in Welfare Economics," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 14(4), pages 478-486, October.
    21. Federico A. Bugni & Ivan A. Canay & Azeem M. Shaikh, 2018. "Inference Under Covariate-Adaptive Randomization," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(524), pages 1784-1796, October.
    22. Pollard, David, 1991. "Asymptotics for Least Absolute Deviation Regression Estimators," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 186-199, June.
    23. Yuehao Bai & Azeem M. Shaikh & Max Tabord-Meehan, 2024. "A Primer on the Analysis of Randomized Experiments and a Survey of some Recent Advances," Papers 2405.03910, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuehao Bai & Azeem M. Shaikh & Max Tabord-Meehan, 2024. "A Primer on the Analysis of Randomized Experiments and a Survey of some Recent Advances," Papers 2405.03910, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    2. Jiang, Liang & Li, Liyao & Miao, Ke & Zhang, Yichong, 2025. "Adjustments with many regressors under covariate-adaptive randomizations," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 249(PB).
    3. Yuehao Bai & Jizhou Liu & Max Tabord-Meehan, 2022. "Inference for Matched Tuples and Fully Blocked Factorial Designs," Papers 2206.04157, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    4. Laurent Davezies & Guillaume Hollard & Pedro Vergara Merino, 2024. "Revisiting Randomization with the Cube Method," Papers 2407.13613, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2025.
    5. Wang, Yuhao & Li, Xinran, 2025. "Asymptotic theory of the best-choice rerandomization using the Mahalanobis distance," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    6. Cai, Yong & Rafi, Ahnaf, 2024. "On the performance of the Neyman Allocation with small pilots," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 242(1).
    7. Bugni, Federico A. & Gao, Mengsi, 2023. "Inference under covariate-adaptive randomization with imperfect compliance," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(1).
    8. Max Cytrynbaum, 2024. "Covariate adjustment in stratified experiments," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(4), pages 971-998, November.
    9. Bai, Yuehao & Liu, Jizhou & Shaikh, Azeem M. & Tabord-Meehan, Max, 2024. "Inference in cluster randomized trials with matched pairs," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 245(1).
    10. Yuehao Bai & Xun Huang & Joseph P. Romano & Azeem M. Shaikh & Max Tabord-Meehan, 2025. "A New Design-Based Variance Estimator for Finely Stratified Experiments," Papers 2503.10851, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    11. Zhao, Anqi & Ding, Peng, 2024. "No star is good news: A unified look at rerandomization based on p-values from covariate balance tests," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 241(1).
    12. Yuehao Bai, 2022. "Optimality of Matched-Pair Designs in Randomized Controlled Trials," Papers 2206.07845, arXiv.org.
    13. Max Cytrynbaum, 2021. "Fine Stratification of Survey Experiments," Papers 2111.08157, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    14. Jiang, Liang & Phillips, Peter C.B. & Tao, Yubo & Zhang, Yichong, 2023. "Regression-adjusted estimation of quantile treatment effects under covariate-adaptive randomizations," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 758-776.
    15. Yuehao Bai & Jizhou Liu & Azeem M. Shaikh & Max Tabord-Meehan, 2023. "On the Efficiency of Highly Stratified Experiments," Papers 2307.15181, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    16. Yuehao Bai & Meng Hsuan Hsieh & Jizhou Liu & Max Tabord-Meehan, 2022. "Revisiting the Analysis of Matched-Pair and Stratified Experiments in the Presence of Attrition," Papers 2209.11840, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    17. Yuehao Bai & Meng Hsuan Hsieh & Jizhou Liu & Max Tabord‐Meehan, 2024. "Revisiting the analysis of matched‐pair and stratified experiments in the presence of attrition," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 256-268, March.
    18. Yuehao Bai & Jizhou Liu & Max Tabord‐Meehan, 2024. "Inference for matched tuples and fully blocked factorial designs," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(2), pages 279-330, May.
    19. Zhao, Anqi & Ding, Peng, 2021. "Covariate-adjusted Fisher randomization tests for the average treatment effect," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 278-294.
    20. Jinglong Zhao, 2024. "Experimental Design For Causal Inference Through An Optimization Lens," Papers 2408.09607, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2604.09858. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.