IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2604.09343.html

Information Intermediaries in Monopolistic Screening

Author

Listed:
  • Panagiotis Kyriazis
  • Edmund Lou

Abstract

We investigate the relationship between product offerings, information dissemination, and consumer decision-making in a monopolistic screening environment in which consumers lack information about their valuation of quality-differentiated products. An intermediary, who is driven by the objective of maximizing consumer surplus but is also biased towards high-quality products, provides recommendations after the monopolist announces the menu of product choices. We characterize the monopolist's profit-maximizing finite-item menu. Our results show that as intermediaries place greater emphasis on consumer surplus over product quality, sellers are prompted to strategically expand their product range. Intriguingly, this augmented product variety decreases economic efficiency compared to scenarios where direct seller-to-consumer information provision is the norm. The role of information intermediaries proves pivotal in shaping consumer welfare, market profitability, and overarching economic efficiency. Our insights underscore the complexities introduced by these intermediaries that policymakers and market designers must consider when designing policies centered on consumer learning and market information transparency.

Suggested Citation

  • Panagiotis Kyriazis & Edmund Lou, 2026. "Information Intermediaries in Monopolistic Screening," Papers 2604.09343, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2604.09343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.09343
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik Brynjolfsson & Yu (Jeffrey) Hu & Michael D. Smith, 2003. "Consumer Surplus in the Digital Economy: Estimating the Value of Increased Product Variety at Online Booksellers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(11), pages 1580-1596, November.
    2. A. Michael Spence, 1980. "Multi-Product Quantity-Dependent Prices and Profitability Constraints," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 47(5), pages 821-841.
    3. Andreas Kleiner & Benny Moldovanu & Philipp Strack, 2021. "Extreme Points and Majorization: Economic Applications," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(4), pages 1557-1593, July.
    4. Dirk Bergemann & Tibor Heumann & Stephen Morris, 2026. "Screening with Persuasion," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 134(2), pages 570-625.
    5. Mussa, Michael & Rosen, Sherwin, 1978. "Monopoly and product quality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 301-317, August.
    6. Andrey Malenko & Anton Tsoy, 2019. "Selling to Advised Buyers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(4), pages 1323-1348, April.
    7. Piotr Dworczak & Giorgio Martini, 2019. "The Simple Economics of Optimal Persuasion," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(5), pages 1993-2048.
    8. Eric Maskin & John Riley, 1984. "Monopoly with Incomplete Information," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 15(2), pages 171-196, Summer.
    9. Dizdar, Deniz & Kováč, Eugen, 2020. "A simple proof of strong duality in the linear persuasion problem," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 407-412.
    10. Jeffrey Mensch, 2022. "Screening Inattentive Buyers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(6), pages 1949-1984, June.
    11. Dixit, Avinash K & Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1977. "Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 67(3), pages 297-308, June.
    12. Isabelle Perrigne & Quang Vuong, 2019. "Econometrics of Auctions and Nonlinear Pricing," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 27-54, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dirk Bergemann & Tibor Heumann & Stephen Morris, 2026. "Screening with Persuasion," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 134(2), pages 570-625.
    2. Pietro Dall'Ara & Elia Sartori, 2026. "Screening in digital monopolies," Papers 2602.13014, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    3. Jong-Hee Hahn & Jinwoo Kim & Sang-Hyun Kim & Jihong Lee, 2018. "Price discrimination with loss averse consumers," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 65(3), pages 681-728, May.
    4. Alexander V. Kolesnikov & Fedor Sandomirskiy & Aleh Tsyvinski & Alexander P. Zimin, 2022. "Beckmann's approach to multi-item multi-bidder auctions," Papers 2203.06837, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2022.
    5. Crawford, Gregory S & Shum, Matthew, 2007. "Monopoly Quality Degradation and Regulation in Cable Television," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 50(1), pages 181-219, February.
    6. Nicol'as Hern'andez Santib'a~nez & Dylan Possamai & Chao Zhou, 2017. "Bank monitoring incentives under moral hazard and adverse selection," Papers 1701.05864, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2019.
    7. Kimmo Berg & Harri Ehtamo, 2012. "Continuous learning methods in two-buyer pricing problem," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 75(3), pages 287-304, June.
    8. Alejandro Francetich & Burkhard Schipper, 2025. "Rationalizable Screening and Disclosure under Unawareness," Working Papers 374, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
    9. Kimmo Berg, 2013. "Complexity of solution structures in nonlinear pricing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 206(1), pages 23-37, July.
    10. Andersson, Tommy, 2004. "Essays on Nonlinear Pricing and Welfare," MPRA Paper 59446, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Yang, Kai Hao, 2021. "Efficient demands in a multi-product monopoly," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    12. Justin P. Johnson & David P. Myatt, 2006. "Multiproduct Cournot oligopoly," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 37(3), pages 583-601, September.
    13. Bing Jing & Roy Radner, 2004. "Nonconvex Production Technology and Price Discrimination," Working Papers 04-04, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
    14. Kelvin Shuangjian Zhang, 2017. "Existence in Multidimensional Screening with General Nonlinear Preferences," Papers 1710.08549, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2018.
    15. Bergemann, Dirk & Heumann, Tibor & Morris, Stephen, 2023. "The Optimality of Constant Mark-Up Pricing," CEPR Discussion Papers 17897, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    16. Sameer Mehta & Milind Dawande & Ganesh Janakiraman & Vijay Mookerjee, 2021. "How to Sell a Data Set? Pricing Policies for Data Monetization," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1281-1297, December.
    17. Kimmo Berg & Harri Ehtamo, 2009. "Learning in nonlinear pricing with unknown utility functions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 375-392, November.
    18. Saran, Rene, 2026. "A dynamic optimization approach to delegation with an application to volunteer contracts," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 27-54.
    19. Matthews, Steven & Moore, John, 1987. "Monopoly Provision of Quality and Warranties: An Exploration in the Theory of Multidimensional Screening," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 441-467, March.
    20. Soo Jin Kim & Pallavi Pal, 2021. "Quality Differentiation and Optimal Pricing Strategy in Multi-Sided Markets," CESifo Working Paper Series 9267, CESifo.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2604.09343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.