IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2604.02455.html

Truthful Production Uncertainty in Electricity Markets: A Two-Stage Mechanism

Author

Listed:
  • Shobhit Singhal
  • Lesia Mitridati
  • Licio Romao

Abstract

Renewable power sources have low marginal pro-duction costs, but may result in high balancing costs due to the inherent production uncertainty. Current day-ahead markets elicit only point production profiles and neglect the degree of uncertainty associated with each generating asset, preventing the market operator from accounting for balancing costs in day-ahead dispatch and ancillary service procurement. This increases total system costs and undermines market efficiency, especially in renewable-heavy power systems. To address this, we propose a new market clearing paradigm based on a two-stage mechanism, where producers report their production forecast distribution in the day-ahead stage, followed by the realized production in the real-time stage. By extending the Vickery-Clarke-Groves (VCG) payments to the two-stage setting, we show appealing properties in terms of incentive compatibility and individual rationality. An electricity market case study validates the theoretical claims, and illustrates the effectiveness of the proposed mechanism to reduce system costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Shobhit Singhal & Lesia Mitridati & Licio Romao, 2026. "Truthful Production Uncertainty in Electricity Markets: A Two-Stage Mechanism," Papers 2604.02455, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2604.02455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.02455
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geoffrey Pritchard & Golbon Zakeri & Andrew Philpott, 2010. "A Single-Settlement, Energy-Only Electric Power Market for Unpredictable and Intermittent Participants," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-2), pages 1210-1219, August.
    2. Victor M. Zavala & Kibaek Kim & Mihai Anitescu & John Birge, 2017. "A Stochastic Electricity Market Clearing Formulation with Consistent Pricing Properties," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 557-576, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ordoudis, Christos & Delikaraoglou, Stefanos & Kazempour, Jalal & Pinson, Pierre, 2020. "Market-based coordination of integrated electricity and natural gas systems under uncertain supply," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 1105-1119.
    2. Xin Shi & Alberto J. Lamadrid L. & Luis F. Zuluaga, 2021. "Revenue Adequate Prices for Chance-Constrained Electricity Markets with Variable Renewable Energy Sources," Papers 2105.01233, arXiv.org.
    3. Ratha, Anubhav & Pinson, Pierre & Le Cadre, Hélène & Virag, Ana & Kazempour, Jalal, 2023. "Moving from linear to conic markets for electricity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 762-783.
    4. Mays, Jacob, 2024. "Sequential pricing of electricity," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    5. Bjørndal, Endre & Bjørndal, Mette & Midthun, Kjetil & Tomasgard, Asgeir, 2018. "Stochastic electricity dispatch: A challenge for market design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 992-1005.
    6. Zhang, Weiqi & Zavala, Victor M., 2022. "Remunerating space–time, load-shifting flexibility from data centers in electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    7. Bjørndal, Endre & Bjørndal, Mette & Midthun, Kjetil & Tomasgard, Asgeir, 2016. "Stochastic Electricity Dispatch: A challenge for market design," Discussion Papers 2016/11, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    8. Hohl, Cody & Lo Prete, Chiara & Radhakrishnan, Ashish & Webster, Mort, 2023. "Intraday markets, wind integration and uplift payments in a regional U.S. power system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    9. Morales, J.M. & Muñoz, M.A. & Pineda, S., 2023. "Prescribing net demand for two-stage electricity generation scheduling," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 10(C).
    10. Thomas Hubner, 2026. "On the Design of Stochastic Electricity Auctions," Papers 2604.13603, arXiv.org.
    11. Kaya, Anil & Conejo, Antonio J. & Rebennack, Steffen, 2026. "Fifty years of power systems optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 329(1), pages 1-23.
    12. Philip A. Tominac & Victor M. Zavala, 2020. "Economic Properties of Multi-Product Supply Chains," Papers 2006.03467, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2020.
    13. Vladimir Dvorkin, 2024. "Regression Equilibrium in Electricity Markets," Papers 2405.17753, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    14. Yankai Cao & Carl D. Laird & Victor M. Zavala, 2016. "Clustering-based preconditioning for stochastic programs," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 379-406, June.
    15. Bjørndal, Endre & Bjørndal, Mette & Midthun, Kjetil & Zakeri, Golbon, 2016. "Congestion Management in a Stochastic Dispatch Model for Electricity Markets," Discussion Papers 2016/12, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    16. Victor M. Zavala & Kibaek Kim & Mihai Anitescu & John Birge, 2017. "A Stochastic Electricity Market Clearing Formulation with Consistent Pricing Properties," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 557-576, June.
    17. Javad Khazaei & Golbon Zakeri & Shmuel S. Oren, 2017. "Single and Multisettlement Approaches to Market Clearing Under Demand Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1147-1164, October.
    18. Ordoudis, Christos & Pinson, Pierre & Morales, Juan M., 2019. "An Integrated Market for Electricity and Natural Gas Systems with Stochastic Power Producers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(2), pages 642-654.
    19. Angelito Calma & William Ho & Lusheng Shao & Huashan Li, 2021. "Operations Research : Topics, Impact, and Trends from 1952–2019," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(5), pages 1487-1508, September.
    20. Avinash N. Madavan & Nathan Dahlin & Subhonmesh Bose & Lang Tong, 2025. "Risk-Sensitive Security-Constrained Economic Dispatch: Pricing and Algorithm Design," Papers 2502.14150, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2604.02455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.