IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2603.20580.html

Outperforming a Benchmark with $\alpha$-Bregman Wasserstein divergence

Author

Listed:
  • Silvana M. Pesenti
  • Thai Nguyen

Abstract

We consider the problem of active portfolio management, where an investor seeks the portfolio with maximal expected utility of the difference between the terminal wealth of their strategy and a proportion of the benchmark's, subject to a budget and a deviation constraint from the benchmark portfolio. As the investor aims at outperforming the benchmark, they choose a divergence that asymmetrically penalises gains and losses as well as penalises underperforming the benchmark more than outperforming it. This is achieved by the recently introduced $\alpha$-Bregman-Wasserstein divergence, subsuming the Bregman-Wasserstein and the popular Wasserstein divergence. We prove existence and uniqueness, characterise the optimal portfolio strategy, and give explicit conditions when the divergence constraints and the budget constraints are binding. We conclude with a numerical illustration of the optimal quantile function in a geometric Brownian motion market model.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvana M. Pesenti & Thai Nguyen, 2026. "Outperforming a Benchmark with $\alpha$-Bregman Wasserstein divergence," Papers 2603.20580, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.20580
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.20580
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gilles-Edouard Espinosa & Nizar Touzi, 2015. "Optimal Investment Under Relative Performance Concerns," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 221-257, April.
    2. Gneiting, Tilmann, 2011. "Making and Evaluating Point Forecasts," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(494), pages 746-762.
    3. Agostino Capponi & Yuchong Zhang, 2024. "A Continuous Time Framework for Sequential Goal-Based Wealth Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(11), pages 7664-7691, November.
    4. Jose Blanchet & Lin Chen & Xun Yu Zhou, 2022. "Distributionally Robust Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection with Wasserstein Distances," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(9), pages 6382-6410, September.
    5. Silvana M. Pesenti & Steven Vanduffel, 2023. "Optimal Transport Divergences induced by Scoring Functions," Papers 2311.12183, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    6. Chunling Luo & Piao Chen & Patrick Jaillet, 2025. "Portfolio Optimization Based on Almost Second-Degree Stochastic Dominance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(8), pages 7029-7055, August.
    7. Dybvig, Philip H, 1988. "Distributional Analysis of Portfolio Choice," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 61(3), pages 369-393, July.
    8. Georg Pflug & David Wozabal, 2007. "Ambiguity in portfolio selection," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(4), pages 435-442.
    9. Bart de Langhe & Stefano Puntoni, 2015. "Bang for the Buck: Gain-Loss Ratio as a Driver of Judgment and Choice," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1137-1163, May.
    10. Rui Gao & Anton Kleywegt, 2023. "Distributionally Robust Stochastic Optimization with Wasserstein Distance," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(2), pages 603-655, May.
    11. Ng, Tak Wa & Nguyen, Thai, 2023. "Portfolio performance under benchmarking relative loss and portfolio insurance: From omega ratio to loss aversion," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(1), pages 149-183, January.
    12. Sid Browne, 2000. "Risk-Constrained Dynamic Active Portfolio Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(9), pages 1188-1199, September.
    13. Suleyman Basak & Alex Shapiro & Lucie Teplá, 2006. "Risk Management with Benchmarking," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 542-557, April.
    14. Mike Ludkovski & Yuri Saporito, 2021. "KrigHedge: Gaussian Process Surrogates for Delta Hedging," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 330-360, July.
    15. Carole Bernard & Silvana M. Pesenti & Steven Vanduffel, 2024. "Robust distortion risk measures," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 774-818, July.
    16. Raymond Kan & Xiaolu Wang, 2024. "Optimal Portfolio Choice with Unknown Benchmark Efficiency," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(9), pages 6117-6138, September.
    17. Kan, Raymond & Lassance, Nathan, 2024. "Optimal Portfolio Choice with Fat Tails and Parameter Uncertainty," LIDAM Reprints LFIN 2024011, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN).
    18. Cuestaalbertos, J. A. & Ruschendorf, L. & Tuerodiaz, A., 1993. "Optimal Coupling of Multivariate Distributions and Stochastic Processes," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 335-361, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiangyu Han & Yijun Hu & Ran Wang & Linxiao Wei, 2025. "On data-driven robust distortion risk measures for non-negative risks with partial information," Papers 2508.10682, arXiv.org.
    2. Silvana Pesenti & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2020. "Portfolio Optimisation within a Wasserstein Ball," Papers 2012.04500, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2022.
    3. Birghila, Corina & Aigner, Maximilian & Engelke, Sebastian, 2025. "Distributionally robust tail bounds based on Wasserstein distance and f-divergence," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    4. Yuxin Du & Dejian Tian & Hui Zhang, 2025. "Robust distortion risk measures with linear penalty under distribution uncertainty," Papers 2503.15824, arXiv.org.
    5. Peng Liu & Steven Vanduffel & Yi Xia, 2025. "Robust distortion risk metrics and portfolio optimization," Papers 2511.08662, arXiv.org.
    6. Chendi Ni & Yuying Li & Peter A. Forsyth, 2023. "Neural Network Approach to Portfolio Optimization with Leverage Constraints:a Case Study on High Inflation Investment," Papers 2304.05297, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    7. Anthony Coache & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2024. "Robust Reinforcement Learning with Dynamic Distortion Risk Measures," Papers 2409.10096, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2025.
    8. Kupper, Michael & Nendel, Max & Sgarabottolo, Alessandro, 2025. "Risk measures based on weak optimal transport," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 734, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    9. Bellini, Fabio & Klar, Bernhard & Müller, Alfred & Rosazza Gianin, Emanuela, 2014. "Generalized quantiles as risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 41-48.
    10. JULES H. Van BINSBERGEN & MICHAEL W. BRANDT & RALPH S. J. KOIJEN, 2008. "Optimal Decentralized Investment Management," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 63(4), pages 1849-1895, August.
    11. Brandon Tam & Silvana M. Pesenti, 2025. "Bounds for Distributionally Robust Optimization Problems," Papers 2504.06381, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    12. Marcelo Righi & Fernanda Muller, 2024. "A note on robust convex risk measures," Papers 2406.12999, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2025.
    13. Blessing, Jonas & Kupper, Michael & Sgarabottolo, Alessandro, 2025. "Discrete approximation of risk-based prices under volatility uncertainty," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 742, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    14. Miao, Kathleen E. & Pesenti, Silvana M., 2025. "Robust elicitable functionals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 326(2), pages 311-325.
    15. Wu, Ruike & Yang, Yanrong & Shang, Han Lin & Zhu, Huanjun, 2025. "Making distributionally robust portfolios feasible in high dimension," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 252(PA).
    16. Silvana M. Pesenti & Steven Vanduffel, 2023. "Optimal Transport Divergences induced by Scoring Functions," Papers 2311.12183, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    17. Bo Rao & Liu Yang & Jingmin Cai, 2025. "Optimal transport-based distributionally robust optimization with polynomial uncertainty," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 215-240, September.
    18. Bernard, C. & De Gennaro Aquino, L. & Vanduffel, S., 2023. "Optimal multivariate financial decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(1), pages 468-483.
    19. Anand Deo, 2025. "EVT-Based Rate-Preserving Distributional Robustness for Tail Risk Functionals," Papers 2506.16230, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    20. van Staden, Pieter M. & Forsyth, Peter A. & Li, Yuying, 2024. "Across-time risk-aware strategies for outperforming a benchmark," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(2), pages 776-800.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.20580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.