IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v326y2025i2p311-325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust elicitable functionals

Author

Listed:
  • Miao, Kathleen E.
  • Pesenti, Silvana M.

Abstract

Elicitable functionals and (strictly) consistent scoring functions are of interest due to their utility of determining (uniquely) optimal forecasts, and thus the ability to effectively backtest predictions. However, in practice, assuming that a distribution is correctly specified is too strong a belief to reliably hold. To remediate this, we incorporate a notion of statistical robustness into the framework of elicitable functionals, meaning that our robust functional accounts for “small” misspecifications of a baseline distribution. Specifically, we propose a robustified version of elicitable functionals by using the Kullback–Leibler divergence to quantify potential misspecifications from a baseline distribution. We show that the robust elicitable functionals admit unique solutions lying at the boundary of the uncertainty region, and provide conditions for existence and uniqueness. Since every elicitable functional possesses infinitely many scoring functions, we propose the class of b-homogeneous strictly consistent scoring functions, for which the robust functionals maintain desirable statistical properties. We show the applicability of the robust elicitable functional in several examples: in a reinsurance setting and in robust regression problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Miao, Kathleen E. & Pesenti, Silvana M., 2025. "Robust elicitable functionals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 326(2), pages 311-325.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:326:y:2025:i:2:p:311-325
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.04.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722172500267X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.04.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:326:y:2025:i:2:p:311-325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.