IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2602.22412.html

A Learning-Based Hybrid Decision Framework for Matching Systems with User Departure Detection

Author

Listed:
  • Ruiqi Zhou
  • Donghao Zhu
  • Houcai Shen

Abstract

In matching markets such as kidney exchanges and freight exchanges, delayed matching has been shown to improve overall market efficiency. The benefits of delay are highly sensitive to participants' sojourn times and departure behavior, and delaying matches can impose significant costs, including longer waiting times and increased market congestion. These competing effects make fixed matching policies inherently inflexible in dynamic environments. We propose a learning-based Hybrid framework that adaptively combines immediate and delayed matching. The framework continuously collects data on user departures over time, estimates the underlying departure distribution via regression, and determines whether to delay matching in the subsequent period based on a decision threshold that governs the system's tolerance for matching efficiency loss. The proposed framework can substantially reduce waiting times and congestion while sacrificing only a limited amount of matching efficiency. By dynamically adjusting its matching strategy, the Hybrid framework enables system performance to flexibly interpolate between purely greedy and purely patient policies, offering a robust and adaptive alternative to static matching mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruiqi Zhou & Donghao Zhu & Houcai Shen, 2026. "A Learning-Based Hybrid Decision Framework for Matching Systems with User Departure Detection," Papers 2602.22412, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2602.22412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.22412
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ross Anderson & Itai Ashlagi & David Gamarnik & Yash Kanoria, 2017. "Efficient Dynamic Barter Exchange," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1446-1459, December.
    2. Mariagiovanna Baccara & Allan Collard-Wexler & Leonardo Felli & Leeat Yariv, 2014. "Child-Adoption Matching: Preferences for Gender and Race," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 6(3), pages 133-158, July.
    3. Itai Ashlagi & Alvin E. Roth, 2021. "Kidney Exchange: An Operations Perspective," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5455-5478, September.
    4. Margarida Carvalho & Xenia Klimentova & Kristiaan Glorie & Ana Viana & Miguel Constantino, 2021. "Robust Models for the Kidney Exchange Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 861-881, July.
    5. Mohammad Akbarpour & Shengwu Li & Shayan Oveis Gharan, 2020. "Thickness and Information in Dynamic Matching Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(3), pages 783-815.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. René Caldentey & Lisa Aoki Hillas & Varun Gupta, 2025. "Designing Service Menus for Bipartite Queueing Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(3), pages 1496-1534, May.
    2. Johannes Baumler & Martin Bullinger & Stefan Kober & Donghao Zhu, 2022. "Superiority of Instantaneous Decisions in Thin Dynamic Matching Markets," Papers 2206.10287, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    3. Danny Segev, 2025. "Near-Optimal Adaptive Policies for Serving Stochastically Departing Customers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(5), pages 2744-2760, September.
    4. Naonori Kakimura & Donghao Zhu, 2021. "Dynamic Bipartite Matching Market with Arrivals and Departures," Papers 2110.10824, arXiv.org.
    5. Philipp Afèche & René Caldentey & Varun Gupta, 2022. "On the Optimal Design of a Bipartite Matching Queueing System," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(1), pages 363-401, January.
    6. Ali Aouad & Daniela Saban, 2023. "Online Assortment Optimization for Two-Sided Matching Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 2069-2087, April.
    7. Ali Aouad & Ömer Sarıtaç, 2022. "Dynamic Stochastic Matching Under Limited Time," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(4), pages 2349-2383, July.
    8. Süleyman Kerimov & Itai Ashlagi & Itai Gurvich, 2024. "Dynamic Matching: Characterizing and Achieving Constant Regret," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(5), pages 2799-2822, May.
    9. Loertscher, Simon & Muir, Ellen V. & Taylor, Peter G., 2022. "Optimal market thickness," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    10. Sushil Mahavir Varma & Pornpawee Bumpensanti & Siva Theja Maguluri & He Wang, 2023. "Dynamic Pricing and Matching for Two-Sided Queues," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(1), pages 83-100, January.
    11. Irene Lo & Vahideh Manshadi & Scott Rodilitz & Ali Shameli, 2020. "Commitment on Volunteer Crowdsourcing Platforms: Implications for Growth and Engagement," Papers 2005.10731, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    12. Baccara, Mariagiovanna & Lee, SangMok & Yariv, Leeat, 2020. "Optimal dynamic matching," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(3), July.
    13. Mingwei Yang & Sophie H. Yu, 2026. "Online Metric Matching: Beyond the Worst Case," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 74(1), pages 130-140, January.
    14. Süleyman Kerimov & Itai Ashlagi & Itai Gurvich, 2025. "On the Optimality of Greedy Policies in Dynamic Matching," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(1), pages 560-582, January.
    15. Kim, Jaehong & Li, Mengling & Xu, Menghan, 2021. "Organ donation with vouchers," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    16. Julien Combe & Vladyslav Nora & Olivier Tercieux, 2021. "Dynamic assignment without money: Optimality of spot mechanisms," Working Papers 2021-11, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    17. Kirill Rudov, 2024. "Fragile Stable Matchings," Papers 2403.12183, arXiv.org.
    18. Hayashi, Reona & Kato, Ryutah & Watanabe, Rin & Kawaguchi, Hirofumi & Morikawa, So & Komatsuzaki, Shunsaku, 2026. "When economic incentives become repugnant: Moderating roles of construction probability and initial acceptance in high-level radioactive waste siting," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 209(PB).
    19. Zahra Gharibi & Hung T. Do & Michael Hahsler & Mehmet U. S. Ayvaci, 2025. "Optimal quality oversight in kidney transplantation and its impact on transplant centers’ waitlist management," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 381-410, September.
    20. Khun, Channary & Lahiri, Sajal, 2017. "The economics of international child adoption: An analysis of adoptions by U.S. parents," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 22-31.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2602.22412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.