IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2602.19384.html

How Robust are Robustness Checks?

Author

Listed:
  • Brenda Prallon

Abstract

Robustness checks are routine in empirical work, but there is no standard statistical procedure to formally measure what one can learn from them. I propose a "robustness radius" measure to quantify the amount by which the robustness checks estimands differ from the main specification estimand. I do so by framing robustness checks as explicitly biased regressions, clarifying what exactly the estimands are when comparing multiple regressions with slightly different samples, and applying a test from the moment inequalities literature. The robustness radius is easily interpretable and adapts to sampling uncertainty and correlation across regressions. An application shows that, although assessing overall robustness is context-specific, the robustness radius guides those judgments and improves transparency.

Suggested Citation

  • Brenda Prallon, 2026. "How Robust are Robustness Checks?," Papers 2602.19384, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2602.19384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.19384
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diaa Al Mohamad & Erik W Van Zwet & Eric Cator & Jelle J Goeman, 2020. "Adaptive critical value for constrained likelihood ratio testing," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 107(3), pages 677-688.
    2. Victor Chernozhukov & Carlos Cinelli & Whitney Newey & Amit Sharma & Vasilis Syrgkanis, 2021. "Long Story Short: Omitted Variable Bias in Causal Machine Learning," Papers 2112.13398, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    3. Guildo W. Imbens, 2003. "Sensitivity to Exogeneity Assumptions in Program Evaluation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(2), pages 126-132, May.
    4. Tamer, Elie, 2010. "Partial Identification in Econometrics," Scholarly Articles 34728615, Harvard University Department of Economics.
    5. Joseph G. Altonji & Todd E. Elder & Christopher R. Taber, 2005. "Selection on Observed and Unobserved Variables: Assessing the Effectiveness of Catholic Schools," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 113(1), pages 151-184, February.
    6. Elie Tamer, 2010. "Partial Identification in Econometrics," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 2(1), pages 167-195, September.
    7. Timothy B. Armstrong & Patrick Kline & Liyang Sun, 2025. "Adapting to Misspecification," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 93(6), pages 1981-2005, November.
    8. Ivan Canay & Gastón Illanes & Amilcar Velez, 2023. "A User's Guide to Inference in Models Defined by Moment Inequalities," NBER Working Papers 31040, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Carlos Cinelli & Chad Hazlett, 2020. "Making sense of sensitivity: extending omitted variable bias," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 82(1), pages 39-67, February.
    10. Emily Oster, 2019. "Unobservable Selection and Coefficient Stability: Theory and Evidence," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 187-204, April.
    11. Gregory Cox & Xiaoxia Shi, 2023. "Simple Adaptive Size-Exact Testing for Full-Vector and Subvector Inference in Moment Inequality Models," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 90(1), pages 201-228.
    12. Lu, Xun & White, Halbert, 2014. "Robustness checks and robustness tests in applied economics," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 178(P1), pages 194-206.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew A. Masten & Alexandre Poirier, 2022. "The Effect of Omitted Variables on the Sign of Regression Coefficients," Papers 2208.00552, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    2. Paul Diegert & Matthew A. Masten & Alexandre Poirier, 2022. "Assessing Omitted Variable Bias when the Controls are Endogenous," Papers 2206.02303, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
    3. Matthew A. Masten & Alexandre Poirier & Linqi Zhang, 2024. "Assessing Sensitivity to Unconfoundedness: Estimation and Inference," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Juan Carlos Escanciano & Lin Zhu, 2013. "Set inferences and sensitivity analysis in semiparametric conditionally identified models," CeMMAP working papers CWP55/13, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    5. Stéphane Bonhomme & Martin Weidner, 2022. "Minimizing sensitivity to model misspecification," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 13(3), pages 907-954, July.
    6. Schuessler, Julian, 2024. "Causal analysis with observational data," OSF Preprints wam94, Center for Open Science.
    7. Vitor Possebom, 2026. "Crime and Mismeasured Punishment: Marginal Treatment Effect with Misclassification," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 108(1), pages 44-56, January.
    8. Pontus af Buren & Jurg Schweri, 2024. "Firms' training processes and their apprentices' education success," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0225, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
    9. Betts, Alexander & Flinder Stierna, Maria & Omata, Naohiko & Sterck, Olivier, 2023. "Refugees welcome? Inter-group interaction and host community attitude formation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    10. Betts,Alexander Milton Stedman & Stierna,Maria Flinder & Omata,Naohiko & Sterck,Olivier Christian Brigitte, 2022. "Social Cohesion and Refugee-Host Interactions : Evidence from East Africa," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9917, The World Bank.
    11. Melody Huang & Cory McCartan, 2025. "Relative Bias Under Imperfect Identification in Observational Causal Inference," Papers 2507.23743, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    12. Deepankar Basu, 2023. "Formal Covariate Benchmarking to Bound Omitted Variable Bias," Papers 2306.10562, arXiv.org.
    13. Pietro Emilio Spini, 2021. "Robustness, Heterogeneous Treatment Effects and Covariate Shifts," Papers 2112.09259, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
    14. Emily Oster, 2013. "Unobservable Selection and Coefficient Stability: Theory and Validation," NBER Working Papers 19054, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Tetyana Balyuk, 2023. "FinTech Lending and Bank Credit Access for Consumers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 555-575, January.
    16. Susan Athey & Guido W. Imbens, 2017. "The State of Applied Econometrics: Causality and Policy Evaluation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 3-32, Spring.
    17. Noy, Shakked & Sin, Isabelle, 2021. "The effects of neighbourhood and workplace income comparisons on subjective wellbeing," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 918-945.
    18. Bevis, Leah & Kim, Kichan & Guerena, David, 2023. "Soil zinc deficiency and child stunting: Evidence from Nepal," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    19. Kyle J. Thomas & Jean Marie McGloin & Christopher J. Sullivan, 2019. "Quantifying the Likelihood of False Positives: Using Sensitivity Analysis to Bound Statistical Inference," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 631-662, December.
    20. Jakob Bjelac & Victor Chernozhukov & Phil-Adrian Klotz & Jannis Kueck & Theresa M. A. Schmitz, 2026. "Automatic debiased machine learning and sensitivity analysis for sample selection models," Papers 2601.08643, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2602.19384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.