IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2512.24747.html

Fairness-Aware Insurance Pricing: A Multi-Objective Optimization Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Tim J. Boonen
  • Xinyue Fan
  • Zixiao Quan

Abstract

Machine learning improves predictive accuracy in insurance pricing but exacerbates trade-offs between competing fairness criteria across different discrimination measures, challenging regulators and insurers to reconcile profitability with equitable outcomes. While existing fairness-aware models offer partial solutions under GLM and XGBoost estimation methods, they remain constrained by single-objective optimization, failing to holistically navigate a conflicting landscape of accuracy, group fairness, individual fairness, and counterfactual fairness. To address this, we propose a novel multi-objective optimization framework that jointly optimizes all four criteria via the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), generating a diverse Pareto front of trade-off solutions. We use a specific selection mechanism to extract a premium on this front. Our results show that XGBoost outperforms GLM in accuracy but amplifies fairness disparities; the Orthogonal model excels in group fairness, while Synthetic Control leads in individual and counterfactual fairness. Our method consistently achieves a balanced compromise, outperforming single-model approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim J. Boonen & Xinyue Fan & Zixiao Quan, 2025. "Fairness-Aware Insurance Pricing: A Multi-Objective Optimization Approach," Papers 2512.24747, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2512.24747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.24747
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, An & Vigna, Elena, 2017. "A unisex stochastic mortality model to comply with EU Gender Directive," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 124-136.
    2. Stefan Wager & Susan Athey, 2018. "Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(523), pages 1228-1242, July.
    3. Martin Eling & Mirko Kraft, 2020. "The impact of telematics on the insurability of risks," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(2), pages 77-109, April.
    4. Lau, Sau-Him Paul & Ying, Yinan, 2024. "Deferred annuities with gender-neutral pricing: Benefitting most women without adversely affecting too many men," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    5. Eli Ben-Michael & Avi Feller & Jesse Rothstein, 2021. "The Augmented Synthetic Control Method," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 116(536), pages 1789-1803, October.
    6. John E. Roemer & Alain Trannoy, 2015. "Chapter 4 - Equality of Opportunity," Post-Print hal-01456129, HAL.
    7. Richard Berk & Hoda Heidari & Shahin Jabbari & Michael Kearns & Aaron Roth, 2021. "Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 50(1), pages 3-44, February.
    8. Lindholm, M. & Richman, R. & Tsanakas, A. & Wüthrich, M.V., 2022. "Discrimination-Free Insurance Pricing," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(1), pages 55-89, January.
    9. Zhang, Ruixiaoxiao & Huang, Lijie & Lee, Minhyun & Mei, Shiqi, 2025. "Multi-objective optimization for customized solar business models considering technical-economic-environmental performance: A NSGA-II integrated TOPSIS method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    10. Olivier Côté & Marie‐Pier Côté & Arthur Charpentier, 2025. "A fair price to pay: Exploiting causal graphs for fairness in insurance," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 92(1), pages 33-75, March.
    11. Abadie, Alberto & Diamond, Alexis & Hainmueller, Jens, 2010. "Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 105(490), pages 493-505.
    12. Ho Ming Lee & Katrien Antonio & Benjamin Avanzi & Lorenzo Marchi & Rui Zhou, 2025. "Machine Learning with Multitype Protected Attributes: Intersectional Fairness through Regularisation," Papers 2509.08163, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    13. Erin Trish & Bradley Herring, 2018. "Does Limiting Allowable Rating Variation In The Small Group Health Insurance Market Affect Employer Self‐Insurance?," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 85(3), pages 607-633, September.
    14. Chenglong Ye & Lin Zhang & Mingxuan Han & Yanjia Yu & Bingxin Zhao & Yuhong Yang, 2022. "Combining Predictions of Auto Insurance Claims," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, April.
    15. Devin G. Pope & Justin R. Sydnor, 2011. "Implementing Anti-discrimination Policies in Statistical Profiling Models," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 3(3), pages 206-231, August.
    16. Turner, Brian & Shinnick, Edward, 2013. "Community rating in the absence of risk equalisation: lessons from the Irish private health insurance market," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 209-224, April.
    17. Xi Xin & Fei Huang, 2024. "Antidiscrimination Insurance Pricing: Regulations, Fairness Criteria, and Models," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 285-319, April.
    18. Roel Henckaerts & Marie-Pier Côté & Katrien Antonio & Roel Verbelen, 2021. "Boosting Insights in Insurance Tariff Plans with Tree-Based Machine Learning Methods," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 255-285, April.
    19. Mathias Lindholm & Ronald Richman & Andreas Tsanakas & Mario V. Wuthrich, 2022. "A Discussion of Discrimination and Fairness in Insurance Pricing," Papers 2209.00858, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fei Huang & Silvana M. Pesenti, 2025. "Marginal Fairness: Fair Decision-Making under Risk Measures," Papers 2505.18895, arXiv.org.
    2. Ho Ming Lee & Katrien Antonio & Benjamin Avanzi & Lorenzo Marchi & Rui Zhou, 2025. "Machine Learning with Multitype Protected Attributes: Intersectional Fairness through Regularisation," Papers 2509.08163, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    3. Hong Beng Lim & Mengyi Xu & Kenneth Q. Zhou, 2026. "Fair Pricing in Long-Term Insurance: A Unified Framework," Papers 2602.04791, arXiv.org.
    4. Boonen, Tim J. & Liu, Fangda, 2022. "Insurance with heterogeneous preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    5. Davide Viviano & Jelena Bradic, 2019. "Synthetic learner: model-free inference on treatments over time," Papers 1904.01490, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    6. Guido W. Imbens, 2022. "Causality in Econometrics: Choice vs Chance," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(6), pages 2541-2566, November.
    7. Roth, Jonathan & Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C. & Bilinski, Alyssa & Poe, John, 2023. "What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 2218-2244.
    8. Xinran Liu, 2026. "Recovering Counterfactual Distributions via Wasserstein GANs," Papers 2601.17296, arXiv.org.
    9. Harry Aytug, 2026. "To Adopt or Not to Adopt: Heterogeneous Trade Effects of the Euro," Papers 2601.19664, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    10. Chen, Qiang & Xiao, Zhijie & Yao, Qingsong, 2025. "Quantile control via random forest," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 249(PA).
    11. Nicolaj N. Mühlbach, 2020. "Tree-based Synthetic Control Methods: Consequences of moving the US Embassy," CREATES Research Papers 2020-04, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    12. Maximiliano Marzetti & Rok Spruk, 2023. "Long-Term Economic Effects of Populist Legal Reforms: Evidence from Argentina," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 65(1), pages 60-95, March.
    13. Arne Henningsen & Guy Low & David Wuepper & Tobias Dalhaus & Hugo Storm & Dagim Belay & Stefan Hirsch, 2024. "Estimating Causal Effects with Observational Data: Guidelines for Agricultural and Applied Economists," IFRO Working Paper 2024/03, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    14. Dennis Shen & Peng Ding & Jasjeet Sekhon & Bin Yu, 2022. "Same Root Different Leaves: Time Series and Cross-Sectional Methods in Panel Data," Papers 2207.14481, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.
    15. Zhentao Shi & Jin Xi & Haitian Xie, 2025. "A Synthetic Business Cycle Approach to Counterfactual Analysis with Nonstationary Macroeconomic Data," Papers 2505.22388, arXiv.org.
    16. Pekka Malo & Juha Eskelinen & Xun Zhou & Timo Kuosmanen, 2024. "Computing Synthetic Controls Using Bilevel Optimization," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(2), pages 1113-1136, August.
    17. Robert Messerle & Jonas Schreyögg, 2024. "Country-level effects of diagnosis-related groups: evidence from Germany’s comprehensive reform of hospital payments," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(6), pages 1013-1030, August.
    18. Michael Funke & Helery Tasane, 2025. "Regional economic impacts of the Øresund cross-border fixed link: Cui Bono?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 2573115-257, December.
    19. Robert Kraemer & Jonne Lehtimäki, 2024. "Government debt, European Institutions and fiscal rules: a synthetic control approach," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 31(4), pages 1112-1157, August.
    20. Garoupa, Nuno & Spruk, Rok, 2025. "Populist constitutional backsliding and judicial independence: Evidence from Türkiye," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2512.24747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.