IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2511.13608.html

A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Time Series Forecasting

Author

Listed:
  • M. Stocker
  • W. Ma{l}gorzewicz
  • M. Fontana
  • S. Ben Taieb

Abstract

Conformal prediction is a powerful post-hoc framework for uncertainty quantification that provides distribution-free coverage guarantees. However, these guarantees crucially rely on the assumption of exchangeability. This assumption is fundamentally violated in time series data, where temporal dependence and distributional shifts are pervasive. As a result, classical split-conformal methods may yield prediction intervals that fail to maintain nominal validity. This review unifies recent advances in conformal forecasting methods specifically designed to address nonexchangeable data. We first present a theoretical foundation, deriving finite-sample guarantees for split-conformal prediction under mild weak-dependence conditions. We then survey and classify state-of-the-art approaches that mitigate serial dependence by reweighting calibration data, dynamically updating residual distributions, or adaptively tuning target coverage levels in real time. Finally, we present a comprehensive simulation study that compares these techniques in terms of empirical coverage, interval width, and computational cost, highlighting practical trade-offs and open research directions.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Stocker & W. Ma{l}gorzewicz & M. Fontana & S. Ben Taieb, 2025. "A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Time Series Forecasting," Papers 2511.13608, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2511.13608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.13608
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Graham Elliott & Allan Timmermann, 2016. "Forecasting in Economics and Finance," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 8(1), pages 81-110, October.
    2. Bollerslev, Tim, 1986. "Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 307-327, April.
    3. R. Cont, 2001. "Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 223-236.
    4. Graham Elliott & Allan Timmermann, 2016. "Economic Forecasting," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 10740.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hernández, Juan R., 2025. "Covered interest parity: A forecasting approach to estimate the neutral band," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    2. Iania, Leonardo & Algieri, Bernardina & Leccadito, Arturo, 2022. "Forecasting total energy’s CO2 emissions," LIDAM Discussion Papers LFIN 2022003, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN).
    3. David I. Harvey & Stephen J. Leybourne & Yang Zu, 2024. "Tests for equal forecast accuracy under heteroskedasticity," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(5), pages 850-869, August.
    4. Jack Fosten & Daniel Gutknecht & Marc-Oliver Pohle, 2023. "Testing Quantile Forecast Optimality," Papers 2302.02747, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    5. Hambuckers, J. & Ulm, M., 2023. "On the role of interest rate differentials in the dynamic asymmetry of exchange rates," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    6. Zou, Yongjie & Li, Honggang, 2014. "Time spans between price maxima and price minima in stock markets," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 395(C), pages 303-309.
    7. Yang, Xiaoqi & Vagnani, Gianluca & Dong, Yan & Ji, Xu, 2024. "Short selling and firms’ long-term stock return volatility: Evidence from Chinese concept stocks in Hong Kong," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    8. Kei Nakagawa & Yusuke Uchiyama, 2020. "GO-GJRSK Model with Application to Higher Order Risk-Based Portfolio," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-12, November.
    9. Takaishi, Tetsuya, 2017. "Rational GARCH model: An empirical test for stock returns," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 473(C), pages 451-460.
    10. Vincenzo Candila, 2013. "A Comparison of the Forecasting Performances of Multivariate Volatility Models," Working Papers 3_228, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Statistiche, Università degli Studi di Salerno.
    11. Pierre J. Venter & Eben Maré, 2020. "GARCH Generated Volatility Indices of Bitcoin and CRIX," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, June.
    12. Ñíguez, Trino-Manuel & Perote, Javier, 2017. "Moments expansion densities for quantifying financial risk," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 53-69.
    13. Lachana, Ioanna & Schröder, David, 2025. "Investor sentiment and stock returns: Wisdom of crowds or power of words? Evidence from Seeking Alpha and Wall Street Journal," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    14. Dennis Kant & Andreas Pick & Jasper de Winter, 2025. "Nowcasting GDP using machine learning methods," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 109(1), pages 1-24, March.
    15. Takaishi, Tetsuya, 2025. "Multifractality and sample size influence on Bitcoin volatility patterns," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    16. Krishnamurthy, Vikram & Leoff, Elisabeth & Sass, Jörn, 2018. "Filterbased stochastic volatility in continuous-time hidden Markov models," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 6(C), pages 1-21.
    17. Kei Nakagawa & Masanori Hirano & Kentaro Minami & Takanobu Mizuta, 2024. "A Multi-agent Market Model Can Explain the Impact of AI Traders in Financial Markets -- A New Microfoundations of GARCH model," Papers 2409.12516, arXiv.org.
    18. Lux, Thomas & Morales-Arias, Leonardo & Sattarhoff, Cristina, 2011. "A Markov-switching multifractal approach to forecasting realized volatility," Kiel Working Papers 1737, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    19. Yudong Wang & Chongfeng Wu, 2013. "Efficiency of Crude Oil Futures Markets: New Evidence from Multifractal Detrending Moving Average Analysis," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 42(4), pages 393-414, December.
    20. Paul Handro & Bogdan Dima, 2024. "Analyzing Financial Markets Efficiency: Insights from a Bibliometric and Content Review," Journal of Financial Studies, Institute of Financial Studies, vol. 16(9), pages 119-175, May.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2511.13608. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.