IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2511.05840.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Standard and comparative e-backtests for general risk measures

Author

Listed:
  • Zhanyi Jiao
  • Qiuqi Wang
  • Yimiao Zhao

Abstract

Backtesting risk measures is a unique and important problem for financial regulators to evaluate risk forecasts reported by financial institutions. As a natural extension to standard (or traditional) backtests, comparative backtests are introduced to evaluate different forecasts against regulatory standard models. Based on recently developed concepts of e-values and e-processes, we focus on how standard and comparative backtests can be manipulated in financial regulation by constructing e-processes. We design a model-free (non-parametric) method for standard backtests of identifiable risk measures and comparative backtests of elicitable risk measures. Our e-backtests are applicable to a wide range of common risk measures including the mean, the variance, the Value-at-Risk, the Expected Shortfall, and the expectile. Our results are illustrated by ample simulation studies and real data analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhanyi Jiao & Qiuqi Wang & Yimiao Zhao, 2025. "Standard and comparative e-backtests for general risk measures," Papers 2511.05840, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2511.05840
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.05840
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2511.05840. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.