IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2510.14988.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Selection Confidence Sets for Equally Weighted Portfolios

Author

Listed:
  • Davide Ferrari
  • Alessandro Fulci
  • Sandra Paterlini

Abstract

Given a universe of N assets, investors often form equally weighted portfolios (EWPs) by selecting subsets of assets. EWPs are simple, robust, and competitive out-of-sample, yet the uncertainty about which subset truly performs best is largely ignored. Traditional approaches typically rely on a single selected portfolio, but this fails to consider alternative investment strategies that may perform just as well when accounting for statistical uncertainty. To address this selection uncertainty, we introduce the Selection Confidence Set (SCS) for EWPs: the set of all portfolios that, under a given loss function and at a specified confidence level, contains the unknown set of optimal portfolios under repeated sampling. The SCS quantifies selection uncertainty by identifying a range of plausible portfolios, challenging the idea of a uniquely optimal choice. Like a confidence set, its size reflects uncertainty -- growing with noisy or limited data, and shrinking as the sample size increases. Theoretically, we establish that the SCS covers the unknown optimal selection with high probability and characterize how its size grows with underlying uncertainty, corroborating these results through Monte Carlo experiments. Applications to the French 17-Industry Portfolios and Layer-1 cryptocurrencies underscore the importance of accounting for selection uncertainty when comparing equally weighted strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Davide Ferrari & Alessandro Fulci & Sandra Paterlini, 2025. "Selection Confidence Sets for Equally Weighted Portfolios," Papers 2510.14988, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2510.14988
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.14988
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. DeMiguel, Victor & Martin-Utrera, Alberto & Nogales, Francisco J., 2013. "Size matters: Optimal calibration of shrinkage estimators for portfolio selection," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 3018-3034.
    2. Fama, Eugene F & French, Kenneth R, 1992. "The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 47(2), pages 427-465, June.
    3. Stephen A. Ross, 2013. "The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 1, pages 11-30, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. Victor DeMiguel & Lorenzo Garlappi & Raman Uppal, 2009. "Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1-N Portfolio Strategy?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(5), pages 1915-1953, May.
    5. Ledoit, Oliver & Wolf, Michael, 2008. "Robust performance hypothesis testing with the Sharpe ratio," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 850-859, December.
    6. Vijay K. Chopra & William T. Ziemba, 2013. "The Effect of Errors in Means, Variances, and Covariances on Optimal Portfolio Choice," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 21, pages 365-373, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    7. Ardia, David & Boudt, Kris, 2018. "The peer performance ratios of hedge funds," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 351-368.
    8. Ding, Yi & Li, Yingying & Zheng, Xinghua, 2021. "High dimensional minimum variance portfolio estimation under statistical factor models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 502-515.
    9. Peter R. Hansen & Asger Lunde & James M. Nason, 2011. "The Model Confidence Set," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 453-497, March.
    10. Rama Malladi & Frank J. Fabozzi, 2017. "Equal-weighted strategy: Why it outperforms value-weighted strategies? Theory and evidence," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(3), pages 188-208, May.
    11. Amendola, Alessandra & Braione, Manuela & Candila, Vincenzo & Storti, Giuseppe, 2020. "A Model Confidence Set approach to the combination of multivariate volatility forecasts," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 873-891.
    12. Olivier Ledoit & Michael Wolf, 2018. "Robust performance hypothesis testing with smooth functions of population moments," ECON - Working Papers 305, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    13. Olha Bodnar & Taras Bodnar & Vilhelm Niklasson, 2025. "Incorporating Different Sources of Information for Bayesian Optimal Portfolio Selection," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 365-377, April.
    14. David Bauder & Taras Bodnar & Nestor Parolya & Wolfgang Schmid, 2021. "Bayesian mean–variance analysis: optimal portfolio selection under parameter uncertainty," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 221-242, February.
    15. Chen, Zhonglu & Zhang, Li & Weng, Chen, 2023. "Does climate policy uncertainty affect Chinese stock market volatility?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 369-381.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Lautizi, 2015. "Large Scale Covariance Estimates for Portfolio Selection," CEIS Research Paper 353, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 07 Aug 2015.
    2. Gianluca De Nard & Olivier Ledoit & Michael Wolf, 2021. "Factor Models for Portfolio Selection in Large Dimensions: The Good, the Better and the Ugly [Using Principal Component Analysis to Estimate a High Dimensional Factor Model with High-frequency Data," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 236-257.
    3. De Nard, Gianluca & Zhao, Zhao, 2023. "Using, taming or avoiding the factor zoo? A double-shrinkage estimator for covariance matrices," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 23-35.
    4. Qingliang Fan & Ruike Wu & Yanrong Yang, 2024. "Shocks-adaptive Robust Minimum Variance Portfolio for a Large Universe of Assets," Papers 2410.01826, arXiv.org.
    5. Kees G. Koedijk & Alfred M.H. Slager & Philip A. Stork, 2016. "Investing in Systematic Factor Premiums," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 22(2), pages 193-234, March.
    6. Weilong Liu & Yanchu Liu, 2025. "Covariance Matrix Estimation for Positively Correlated Assets," Papers 2507.01545, arXiv.org.
    7. Candelon, B. & Hurlin, C. & Tokpavi, S., 2012. "Sampling error and double shrinkage estimation of minimum variance portfolios," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 511-527.
    8. Ammann, Manuel & Coqueret, Guillaume & Schade, Jan-Philip, 2016. "Characteristics-based portfolio choice with leverage constraints," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 23-37.
    9. Karstanje, Dennis & Sojli, Elvira & Tham, Wing Wah & van der Wel, Michel, 2013. "Economic valuation of liquidity timing," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5073-5087.
    10. Füss, Roland & Miebs, Felix & Trübenbach, Fabian, 2014. "A jackknife-type estimator for portfolio revision," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 14-28.
    11. Hiraki, Kazuhiro & Sun, Chuanping, 2022. "A toolkit for exploiting contemporaneous stock correlations," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 99-124.
    12. Massimo Guidolin & Manuela Pedio & Dimos Andronoudis, 2019. "How Smart is the Real Estate Smart Beta? Evidence from Optimal Style Factor Strategies for REITs," BAFFI CAREFIN Working Papers 19117, BAFFI CAREFIN, Centre for Applied Research on International Markets Banking Finance and Regulation, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    13. Michele Costola & Bertrand Maillet & Zhining Yuan & Xiang Zhang, 2024. "Mean–variance efficient large portfolios: a simple machine learning heuristic technique based on the two-fund separation theorem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 334(1), pages 133-155, March.
    14. Karagiannidis, Iordanis & Vozlyublennaia, Nadia, 2016. "Limits to mutual funds' ability to rely on mean/variance optimization," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 282-292.
    15. Marie Brière & Ariane Szafarz, 2021. "When it rains, it pours: Multifactor asset management in good and bad times," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 44(3), pages 641-669, September.
    16. Fuertes, Ana-Maria & Zhao, Nan, 2023. "A Bayesian perspective on commodity style integration," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 30(C).
    17. Tu, Xueyong & Li, Bin, 2024. "Robust portfolio selection with smart return prediction," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    18. Giulio Bottazzi & Francesco Cordoni & Giulia Livieri & Stefano Marmi, 2023. "Uncertainty in firm valuation and a cross-sectional misvaluation measure," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 63-93, March.
    19. Hongseon Kim & Soonbong Lee & Seung Bum Soh & Seongmoon Kim, 2022. "Improving portfolio investment performance with distance‐based portfolio‐combining algorithms," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 45(4), pages 941-959, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2510.14988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.