IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/empfin/v65y2022icp99-124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A toolkit for exploiting contemporaneous stock correlations

Author

Listed:
  • Hiraki, Kazuhiro
  • Sun, Chuanping

Abstract

Contemporaneous correlations are important for portfolio optimization problems. We propose a newly developed machine learning tool, the OWL shrinkage method, which explicitly exploits stocks’ contemporaneous correlations by assigning similar positions to correlated stocks (the grouping property). We find strong evidence that OWL-based portfolio strategies outperform other benchmark strategies in the literature when stocks exhibit strong correlations. In particular, the OWL shrinkage method bridges the gap between the naive (but well performing) 1/N portfolio strategy and the portfolio optimization framework: our OWL-based portfolio strategies yield very similar portfolio weights to (yet not the same as) the 1/N portfolio strategy, but outperform the 1/N portfolio strategy in terms of both the Sharpe ratio and turnovers. We also show that the superior performance in Sharpe ratio against the 1/N portfolio is significant.

Suggested Citation

  • Hiraki, Kazuhiro & Sun, Chuanping, 2022. "A toolkit for exploiting contemporaneous stock correlations," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 99-124.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:empfin:v:65:y:2022:i:c:p:99-124
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2021.11.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927539821000967
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jempfin.2021.11.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Victor DeMiguel & Lorenzo Garlappi & Raman Uppal, 2009. "Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1-N Portfolio Strategy?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(5), pages 1915-1953, May.
    2. Olivier Ledoit & Michael Wolf, 2017. "Nonlinear Shrinkage of the Covariance Matrix for Portfolio Selection: Markowitz Meets Goldilocks," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 30(12), pages 4349-4388.
    3. Ravi Jagannathan & Tongshu Ma, 2003. "Risk Reduction in Large Portfolios: Why Imposing the Wrong Constraints Helps," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 58(4), pages 1651-1683, August.
    4. Dendramis, Yiannis & Giraitis, Liudas & Kapetanios, George, 2021. "Estimation Of Time-Varying Covariance Matrices For Large Datasets," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(6), pages 1100-1134, December.
    5. Peter R. Hansen & Asger Lunde & James M. Nason, 2011. "The Model Confidence Set," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 453-497, March.
    6. Kan, Raymond & Zhou, Guofu, 2007. "Optimal Portfolio Choice with Parameter Uncertainty," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(3), pages 621-656, September.
    7. Victor DeMiguel & Lorenzo Garlappi & Francisco J. Nogales & Raman Uppal, 2009. "A Generalized Approach to Portfolio Optimization: Improving Performance by Constraining Portfolio Norms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(5), pages 798-812, May.
    8. B. Fastrich & S. Paterlini & P. Winker, 2015. "Constructing optimal sparse portfolios using regularization methods," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 417-434, July.
    9. Victor DeMiguel & Francisco J. Nogales & Raman Uppal, 2014. "Stock Return Serial Dependence and Out-of-Sample Portfolio Performance," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 27(4), pages 1031-1073.
    10. Harry Markowitz, 1952. "Portfolio Selection," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 7(1), pages 77-91, March.
    11. Ledoit, Oliver & Wolf, Michael, 2008. "Robust performance hypothesis testing with the Sharpe ratio," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 850-859, December.
    12. Howard D. Bondell & Brian J. Reich, 2008. "Simultaneous Regression Shrinkage, Variable Selection, and Supervised Clustering of Predictors with OSCAR," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 115-123, March.
    13. Ledoit, Olivier & Wolf, Michael, 2003. "Improved estimation of the covariance matrix of stock returns with an application to portfolio selection," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 603-621, December.
    14. Ravi Jagannathan & Tongshu Ma, 2003. "Risk Reduction in Large Portfolios: Why Imposing the Wrong Constraints Helps," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 58(4), pages 1651-1684, August.
    15. Victor DeMiguel & Alberto Martín-Utrera & Francisco J Nogales & Raman Uppal & Andrew KarolyiEditor, 2020. "A Transaction-Cost Perspective on the Multitude of Firm Characteristics," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(5), pages 2180-2222.
    16. Zou, Hui, 2006. "The Adaptive Lasso and Its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1418-1429, December.
    17. DeMiguel, Victor & Plyakha, Yuliya & Uppal, Raman & Vilkov, Grigory, 2013. "Improving Portfolio Selection Using Option-Implied Volatility and Skewness," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 48(6), pages 1813-1845, December.
    18. Alex Chinco & Adam D. Clark‐Joseph & Mao Ye, 2019. "Sparse Signals in the Cross‐Section of Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 74(1), pages 449-492, February.
    19. Mengmeng Ao & Li Yingying & Xinghua Zheng, 2019. "Approaching Mean-Variance Efficiency for Large Portfolios," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(7), pages 2890-2919.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Christina Dan & Chen, Zhao & Lian, Yimin & Chen, Min, 2022. "Asset selection based on high frequency Sharpe ratio," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 168-188.
    2. Johannes Bock, 2018. "An updated review of (sub-)optimal diversification models," Papers 1811.08255, arXiv.org.
    3. Caner, Mehmet & Medeiros, Marcelo & Vasconcelos, Gabriel F.R., 2023. "Sharpe Ratio analysis in high dimensions: Residual-based nodewise regression in factor models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 393-417.
    4. Kremer, Philipp J. & Lee, Sangkyun & Bogdan, Małgorzata & Paterlini, Sandra, 2020. "Sparse portfolio selection via the sorted ℓ1-Norm," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    5. Behr, Patrick & Guettler, Andre & Truebenbach, Fabian, 2012. "Using industry momentum to improve portfolio performance," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 1414-1423.
    6. Khashanah, Khaldoun & Simaan, Majeed & Simaan, Yusif, 2022. "Do we need higher-order comoments to enhance mean-variance portfolios? Evidence from a simplified jump process," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    7. Füss, Roland & Miebs, Felix & Trübenbach, Fabian, 2014. "A jackknife-type estimator for portfolio revision," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 14-28.
    8. N'Golo Kone, 2021. "Efficient mean-variance portfolio selection by double regularization," Working Paper 1453, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    9. Xing, Xin & Hu, Jinjin & Yang, Yaning, 2014. "Robust minimum variance portfolio with L-infinity constraints," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 107-117.
    10. Santos, André Alves Portela & Ferreira, Alexandre R., 2017. "On the choice of covariance specifications for portfolio selection problems," Brazilian Review of Econometrics, Sociedade Brasileira de Econometria - SBE, vol. 37(1), May.
    11. Hsu, Po-Hsuan & Han, Qiheng & Wu, Wensheng & Cao, Zhiguang, 2018. "Asset allocation strategies, data snooping, and the 1 / N rule," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 257-269.
    12. Sven Husmann & Antoniya Shivarova & Rick Steinert, 2022. "Sparsity and stability for minimum-variance portfolios," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(3), pages 214-235, September.
    13. Kourtis, Apostolos & Dotsis, George & Markellos, Raphael N., 2012. "Parameter uncertainty in portfolio selection: Shrinking the inverse covariance matrix," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 2522-2531.
    14. Ding, Wenliang & Shu, Lianjie & Gu, Xinhua, 2023. "A robust Glasso approach to portfolio selection in high dimensions," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 22-37.
    15. Yen, Yu-Min & Yen, Tso-Jung, 2014. "Solving norm constrained portfolio optimization via coordinate-wise descent algorithms," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 737-759.
    16. Sven Husmann & Antoniya Shivarova & Rick Steinert, 2020. "Company classification using machine learning," Papers 2004.01496, arXiv.org, revised May 2020.
    17. Wolfgang Karl Hardle & Yegor Klochkov & Alla Petukhina & Nikita Zhivotovskiy, 2022. "Robustifying Markowitz," Papers 2212.13996, arXiv.org.
    18. Fletcher, Jonathan, 2011. "Do optimal diversification strategies outperform the 1/N strategy in U.K. stock returns?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 375-385.
    19. Sven Husmann & Antoniya Shivarova & Rick Steinert, 2019. "Sparsity and Stability for Minimum-Variance Portfolios," Papers 1910.11840, arXiv.org.
    20. DeMiguel, Victor & Martin-Utrera, Alberto & Nogales, Francisco J., 2013. "Size matters: Optimal calibration of shrinkage estimators for portfolio selection," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 3018-3034.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Portfolio optimization; LASSO; Machine learning; 1/N portfolio strategy; Stock correlation; Norm constraints; Model confidence set;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:empfin:v:65:y:2022:i:c:p:99-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jempfin .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.