IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2510.14985.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

DeepAries: Adaptive Rebalancing Interval Selection for Enhanced Portfolio Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Jinkyu Kim
  • Hyunjung Yi
  • Mogan Gim
  • Donghee Choi
  • Jaewoo Kang

Abstract

We propose DeepAries , a novel deep reinforcement learning framework for dynamic portfolio management that jointly optimizes the timing and allocation of rebalancing decisions. Unlike prior reinforcement learning methods that employ fixed rebalancing intervals regardless of market conditions, DeepAries adaptively selects optimal rebalancing intervals along with portfolio weights to reduce unnecessary transaction costs and maximize risk-adjusted returns. Our framework integrates a Transformer-based state encoder, which effectively captures complex long-term market dependencies, with Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) to generate simultaneous discrete (rebalancing intervals) and continuous (asset allocations) actions. Extensive experiments on multiple real-world financial markets demonstrate that DeepAries significantly outperforms traditional fixed-frequency and full-rebalancing strategies in terms of risk-adjusted returns, transaction costs, and drawdowns. Additionally, we provide a live demo of DeepAries at https://deep-aries.github.io/, along with the source code and dataset at https://github.com/dmis-lab/DeepAries, illustrating DeepAries' capability to produce interpretable rebalancing and allocation decisions aligned with shifting market regimes. Overall, DeepAries introduces an innovative paradigm for adaptive and practical portfolio management by integrating both timing and allocation into a unified decision-making process.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinkyu Kim & Hyunjung Yi & Mogan Gim & Donghee Choi & Jaewoo Kang, 2025. "DeepAries: Adaptive Rebalancing Interval Selection for Enhanced Portfolio Selection," Papers 2510.14985, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2510.14985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.14985
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hubert Dichtl & Wolfgang Drobetz & Martin Wambach, 2014. "Where is the value added of rebalancing? A systematic comparison of alternative rebalancing strategies," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 28(3), pages 209-231, August.
    2. Bryan Lim & Stefan Zohren & Stephen Roberts, 2019. "Enhancing Time Series Momentum Strategies Using Deep Neural Networks," Papers 1904.04912, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2020.
    3. Zhengyao Jiang & Dixing Xu & Jinjun Liang, 2017. "A Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework for the Financial Portfolio Management Problem," Papers 1706.10059, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2017.
    4. William F. Sharpe, 1964. "Capital Asset Prices: A Theory Of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions Of Risk," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 19(3), pages 425-442, September.
    5. Hwang, Yoontae & Park, Junpyo & Lee, Yongjae & Lim, Dong-Young, 2023. "Stop-loss adjusted labels for machine learning-based trading of risky assets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xing Wang & Yijun Wang & Bin Weng & Aleksandr Vinel, 2020. "Stock2Vec: A Hybrid Deep Learning Framework for Stock Market Prediction with Representation Learning and Temporal Convolutional Network," Papers 2010.01197, arXiv.org.
    2. Shuo Sun & Rundong Wang & Bo An, 2021. "Reinforcement Learning for Quantitative Trading," Papers 2109.13851, arXiv.org.
    3. Liu Ziyin & Kentaro Minami & Kentaro Imajo, 2021. "Theoretically Motivated Data Augmentation and Regularization for Portfolio Construction," Papers 2106.04114, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    4. Yunan Ye & Hengzhi Pei & Boxin Wang & Pin-Yu Chen & Yada Zhu & Jun Xiao & Bo Li, 2020. "Reinforcement-Learning based Portfolio Management with Augmented Asset Movement Prediction States," Papers 2002.05780, arXiv.org.
    5. Michael Senescall & Rand Kwong Yew Low, 2024. "Quantitative Portfolio Management: Review and Outlook," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-25, September.
    6. Hao Chen & Changxin Xu & Zhiliang Xu, 2025. "Integrating Weak Aggregating Algorithm and Reinforcement Learning for Online Portfolio Selection: The WARL Strategy," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 66(3), pages 2001-2027, September.
    7. Ricard Durall, 2022. "Asset Allocation: From Markowitz to Deep Reinforcement Learning," Papers 2208.07158, arXiv.org.
    8. Junyi Ye & Bhaskar Goswami & Jingyi Gu & Ajim Uddin & Guiling Wang, 2024. "From Factor Models to Deep Learning: Machine Learning in Reshaping Empirical Asset Pricing," Papers 2403.06779, arXiv.org.
    9. Jiayue Zhang & Ken Seng Tan & Tony S. Wirjanto & Lysa Porth, 2023. "Navigating Uncertainty in ESG Investing," Papers 2310.02163, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2025.
    10. Shi, Huai-Long & Zhou, Wei-Xing, 2022. "Factor volatility spillover and its implications on factor premia," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    11. Ho, Ron Yiu-wah & Strange, Roger & Piesse, Jenifer, 2006. "On the conditional pricing effects of beta, size, and book-to-market equity in the Hong Kong market," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 199-214, July.
    12. Muhammad Kashif & Thomas Leirvik, 2022. "The MAX Effect in an Oil Exporting Country: The Case of Norway," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Michel Fliess & Cédric Join, 2009. "Systematic risk analysis: first steps towards a new definition of beta," Post-Print inria-00425077, HAL.
    14. Barbara Fidanza & Ottorino Morresi, 2021. "Size and Value Anomalies in European Bank Stocks," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(12), pages 227-227, July.
    15. Bo-Hung Chiou & Shen-Ho Chang, 2020. "Influence of Investment Efficiency by Managers and Accounting Conservatism on Idiosyncratic Risks to Investors," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8.
    16. Constantinos Antoniou & John A. Doukas & Avanidhar Subrahmanyam, 2016. "Investor Sentiment, Beta, and the Cost of Equity Capital," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 347-367, February.
    17. Radosław Kurach, 2013. "Does Beta Explain Global Equity Market Volatility – Some Empirical Evidence," Contemporary Economics, Vizja University, vol. 7(2), June.
    18. Zabolotnyy, Serihiy & Wasilewski, Mirosław, 2018. "Operating and financial leverage as risk measures in agricultural companies," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 276377, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    19. Shi, Yun & Cui, Xiangyu & Zhou, Xunyu, 2020. "Beta and Coskewness Pricing: Perspective from Probability Weighting," SocArXiv 5rqhv, Center for Open Science.
    20. Abugri, Benjamin A. & Dutta, Sandip, 2014. "Are we overestimating REIT idiosyncratic risk? Analysis of pricing effects and persistence," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 249-259.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2510.14985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.