IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2508.02758.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

CTBench: Cryptocurrency Time Series Generation Benchmark

Author

Listed:
  • Yihao Ang
  • Qiang Wang
  • Qiang Huang
  • Yifan Bao
  • Xinyu Xi
  • Anthony K. H. Tung
  • Chen Jin
  • Zhiyong Huang

Abstract

Synthetic time series are essential tools for data augmentation, stress testing, and algorithmic prototyping in quantitative finance. However, in cryptocurrency markets, characterized by 24/7 trading, extreme volatility, and rapid regime shifts, existing Time Series Generation (TSG) methods and benchmarks often fall short, jeopardizing practical utility. Most prior work (1) targets non-financial or traditional financial domains, (2) focuses narrowly on classification and forecasting while neglecting crypto-specific complexities, and (3) lacks critical financial evaluations, particularly for trading applications. To address these gaps, we introduce \textsf{CTBench}, the first comprehensive TSG benchmark tailored for the cryptocurrency domain. \textsf{CTBench} curates an open-source dataset from 452 tokens and evaluates TSG models across 13 metrics spanning 5 key dimensions: forecasting accuracy, rank fidelity, trading performance, risk assessment, and computational efficiency. A key innovation is a dual-task evaluation framework: (1) the \emph{Predictive Utility} task measures how well synthetic data preserves temporal and cross-sectional patterns for forecasting, while (2) the \emph{Statistical Arbitrage} task assesses whether reconstructed series support mean-reverting signals for trading. We benchmark eight representative models from five methodological families over four distinct market regimes, uncovering trade-offs between statistical fidelity and real-world profitability. Notably, \textsf{CTBench} offers model ranking analysis and actionable guidance for selecting and deploying TSG models in crypto analytics and strategy development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yihao Ang & Qiang Wang & Qiang Huang & Yifan Bao & Xinyu Xi & Anthony K. H. Tung & Chen Jin & Zhiyong Huang, 2025. "CTBench: Cryptocurrency Time Series Generation Benchmark," Papers 2508.02758, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2508.02758
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.02758
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. László Vancsura & Tibor Tatay & Tibor Bareith, 2025. "Navigating AI-Driven Financial Forecasting: A Systematic Review of Current Status and Critical Research Gaps," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-49, July.
    2. Zura Kakushadze, 2016. "101 Formulaic Alphas," Papers 1601.00991, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2016.
    3. Magnus Wiese & Robert Knobloch & Ralf Korn & Peter Kretschmer, 2020. "Quant GANs: deep generation of financial time series," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(9), pages 1419-1440, September.
    4. Julian Winkel & Wolfgang Karl Härdle, 2023. "Pricing Kernels and Risk Premia implied in Bitcoin Options," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Treynor, Jack L & Black, Fischer, 1973. "How to Use Security Analysis to Improve Portfolio Selection," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 46(1), pages 66-86, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bokai Cao & Saizhuo Wang & Xinyi Lin & Xiaojun Wu & Haohan Zhang & Lionel M. Ni & Jian Guo, 2025. "From Deep Learning to LLMs: A survey of AI in Quantitative Investment," Papers 2503.21422, arXiv.org.
    2. Butt, Prof. Khursheed A & Pandow, Bilal Ahmad, 2013. "An analysis into the Stock Selectivity skill of Indian Fund Managers," MPRA Paper 83500, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2013.
    3. Fernandes, Marcelo & Mergulhão, João, 2016. "Anticipatory effects in the FTSE 100 index revisions," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 79-90.
    4. Jeroen Derwall & Kees Koedijk, 2009. "Socially Responsible Fixed‐Income Funds," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1‐2), pages 210-229, January.
    5. Hsiao-Fen Hsiao & Jiang-Chuan Huang & Zheng-Wei Lin, 2020. "Portfolio construction using bootstrapping neural networks: evidence from global stock market," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 227-247, October.
    6. Andrei Kapaev, 2013. "Remark on repo and options," Papers 1311.5211, arXiv.org.
    7. Massimiliano Caporin & Grégory M. Jannin & Francesco Lisi & Bertrand B. Maillet, 2014. "A Survey On The Four Families Of Performance Measures," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 917-942, December.
    8. Michael Karpe, 2020. "An overall view of key problems in algorithmic trading and recent progress," Papers 2006.05515, arXiv.org.
    9. Solveig Flaig & Gero Junike, 2022. "Scenario Generation for Market Risk Models Using Generative Neural Networks," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, October.
    10. Enrico G. De Giorgi & Thierry Post, 2011. "Loss Aversion with a State-Dependent Reference Point," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1094-1110, June.
    11. Mario Alejandro Acosta R., 2014. "Las acciones como activo de reserva para el Banco de la Rep√∫blica," Documentos CEDE 11004, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    12. Pätäri, Eero & Karell, Ville & Luukka, Pasi & Yeomans, Julian S, 2018. "Comparison of the multicriteria decision-making methods for equity portfolio selection: The U.S. evidence," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 655-672.
    13. Blanka Horvath & Josef Teichmann & Žan Žurič, 2021. "Deep Hedging under Rough Volatility," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    14. Alexandre Miot, 2020. "Adversarial trading," Papers 2101.03128, arXiv.org.
    15. Jie Fang & Shutao Xia & Jianwu Lin & Yong Jiang, 2019. "Automatic Financial Feature Construction," Papers 1912.06236, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2020.
    16. Sujoy Mukerji & Han N. Ozsoylev & Jean‐Marc Tallon, 2023. "Trading Ambiguity: A Tale Of Two Heterogeneities," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 64(3), pages 1127-1164, August.
    17. Grønborg, Niels S. & Lunde, Asger & Timmermann, Allan & Wermers, Russ, 2021. "Picking funds with confidence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 1-28.
    18. Namvar, Ethan & Phillips, Blake & Pukthuanthong, Kuntara & Raghavendra Rau, P., 2016. "Do hedge funds dynamically manage systematic risk?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 1-15.
    19. Bessler, Wolfgang & Drobetz, Wolfgang & Henn Overbeck, Jacqueline, 2005. "Hedge Funds: Die "Königsdisziplin" der Kapitalanlage," Working papers 2005/04, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    20. Kajtazi, Anton & Moro, Andrea, 2019. "The role of bitcoin in well diversified portfolios: A comparative global study," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 143-157.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2508.02758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.